• Complain

John McPhee - Draft No. 4: On the Writing Process

Here you can read online John McPhee - Draft No. 4: On the Writing Process full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2017, publisher: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, genre: Detective and thriller. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Draft No. 4: On the Writing Process
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Farrar, Straus and Giroux
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2017
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Draft No. 4: On the Writing Process: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Draft No. 4: On the Writing Process" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The long-awaited guide to writing long-form nonfiction by the legendary author and teacher

Draft No. 4 is a master class on the writers craft. In a series of playful, expertly wrought essays, John McPhee shares insights he has gathered over his career and has refined while teaching at Princeton University, where he has nurtured some of the most esteemed writers of recent decades. McPhee offers definitive guidance in the decisions regarding arrangement, diction, and tone that shape nonfiction pieces, and he presents extracts from his work, subjecting them to wry scrutiny. In one essay, he considers the delicate art of getting sources to tell you what they might not otherwise reveal. In another, he discusses how to use flashback to place a bear encounter in a travel narrative, while observing that readers are not supposed to notice the structure. It is meant to be about as visible as someones bones. The result is a vivid depiction of the writing process, from reporting to drafting to revisingand revising, and revising.

Draft No. 4 is enriched by multiple diagrams and by personal anecdotes and charming reflections on the life of a writer. McPhee describes his enduring relationships with The New Yorker and Farrar, Straus and Giroux, and recalls his early years at Time magazine. Throughout, Draft No. 4 is enlivened by his keen sense of writing as a way of being in the world.

John McPhee: author's other books


Who wrote Draft No. 4: On the Writing Process? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Draft No. 4: On the Writing Process — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Draft No. 4: On the Writing Process" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Contents
Guide
Pagebreaks of the print version
The author and publisher have provided this e-book to you for your personal use - photo 1

The author and publisher have provided this e-book to you for your personal use - photo 2

The author and publisher have provided this e-book to you for your personal use only. You may not make this e-book publicly available in any way. Copyright infringement is against the law. If you believe the copy of this e-book you are reading infringes on the authors copyright, please notify the publisher at: us.macmillanusa.com/piracy.

For Gordon Gund,

who doesnt miss a word, and

For Yolanda Whitman,

who is unreluctant to say when words

are missing, and

To half a thousand Princeton students,

who have heard it all before.

This book derives from eight essays on the writing process that have appeared in The New Yorker . One of themCheckpointswas included in a miscellaneous collection called Silk Parachute , but to a far greater extent belongs here, and is republished here.

In the late nineteen-sixties I was working in rented space on Nassau Street up - photo 3

In the late nineteen-sixties, I was working in rented space on Nassau Street up a flight of stairs and over Nathan Kasrel, Optometrist. Across the street was the main library of Princeton University. Across the hall was the Swedish Massage. Operated by an Austrian couple who were nearing retirement and had been there for decades, it was a legitimate business. They massaged everything from college football players to arthritic ancients, and they didnt give sex. This, however, was the era when massage became a sexual synonym, and most eveningsavoiding writing, looking down from my window on the passing sceneI would see men in business suits stop, hesitate, look around, and then move toward the glass door at the foot of the stairs. Eventually, the Austrians had to scrape the words Swedish Massage off the door, and replace them with a hanging sign they removed when they went home at night. Meanwhile, the men kept arriving at the top of the stairs, where neither door was marked. When they knocked on mine and I opened it, their faces fell dramatically as the busty Swede they expected turned into a short and bearded man.

In this context, I wrote three related pieces that became a book called Encounters with the Archdruid . To a bulletin board I had long since pinned a sheet of paper on which I had written, in large block letters, ABC/D. The letters represented the structure of a piece of writing, and when I put them on the wall I had no idea what the theme would be or who might be A or B or C, let alone the denominator D. They would be real people, certainly, and they would meet in real places, but everything else was initially abstract.

That is no way to start a writing project, let me tell you. You begin with a subject, gather material, and work your way to structure from there. You pile up volumes of notes and then figure out what you are going to do with them, not the other way around. In 1846, in Grahams Magazine , Edgar Allan Poe published an essay called The Philosophy of Composition, in which he described the stages of thought through which he had conceived of and eventually written his poem The Raven. The idea began in the abstract. He wanted to write something tonally sombre, sad, mournful, and saturated with melancholia, he knew not what. He thought it should be repetitive and have a one-word refrain. He asked himself which vowel would best serve the purpose. He chose the long o. And what combining consonant, producibly doleful and lugubrious? He settled on r. Vowel, consonant, o, r. Lore. Core. Door. Lenore. Quoth the Raven, Nevermore. Actually, he said nevermore was the first such word that crossed his mind. How much cool truth there is in that essay is in the eye of the reader.

Nonetheless, I was doing something like it when I put ABC/D on the wall. For more than a decade, first at Time magazine and then at The New Yorker , I had been writing profileseach, by definition, portraying an individual. At Time , I did countless sketches, long and short, of show-business people (Richard Burton, Sophia Loren, Barbra Streisand, et al.), and at The New Yorker even longer pieces, on an athlete, a headmaster, an art historian, an expert on wild food. After ten years of that, I was a little desperate to escalate, or at least get out of a groove that might turn into a rut.

To prepare a profile of an individual, the reporting endeavor looks something like this:

The X is the person you are principally going to talk to spend time with - photo 4

The X is the person you are principally going to talk to, spend time with, observe, and write about. The Os represent peripheral interviews with people who can shed light on the life and career of Xher friends, or his mother, old teachers, teammates, colleagues, employees, enemies, anybody at all, the more the better. Cumulatively, the Os provide triangulationa way of checking facts one against another, and of eliminating apocrypha. Writers like Mark Singer and Brock Brower have said that you know youve done enough peripheral interviewing when you meet yourself coming the other way.

So, after those ten years and feeling squeezed in the form, I thought about doing a double profile, through a process like this:

In the resonance between the two sides added dimension might develop Maybe I - photo 5

In the resonance between the two sides, added dimension might develop. Maybe I would twice meet myself coming the other way. Or four times. Who could tell what might happen? In any case, one plus one should add up to more than two.

Then who? What two people? I thought of various combinations: an actor and a director, a pitcher and a manager, a dancer and a choreographer, a celebrated architect and a highly successful bullheaded client, 1 + 1 = 2.6. One day while I was still undecided, I happened to watch on CBS a mens semifinal in the first United States Open Tennis Championships. Two Americansone of them twenty-five years old, the other twenty-fourwere playing each other. One was white, the other black. One had grown up beside a playground in inner-city Richmond, the other on Wimbledon Road in Clevelands wealthiest suburb. On their level are so few tennis playersand the places they compete are so organized nationallythat these two would have known each other since they were eleven years old. For something like three weeks, I kept thinking about that combination and its possibilities, and then decided to attempt a double portrait, letting the match itself contain and structure the story. I would not be able to do that without a copy of the CBS tape. In those days, tapes were not archived. They saw repeated use. The copying would have to be done as something called a kinescopea sixteen-millimeter film shot from a television monitor. I asked William Shawn, The New Yorker s editor, if he would pay for the kinescope. Very well, he said, sighing. Go ahead. I called CBS. A guy there said, You havent called a minute too soon. That tape is scheduled to be erased this afternoon.

Called Levels of the Game, the double profile worked out, and my aspirations went into a vaulting mode. If two made sense, why not four people in one complex piece of writing? That was when I put the block letters on the bulletin board. A, B, and C would be separate from one another, and each would interact with D, yes, but who were these people? As things would eventuate, the two projects I am describing1 + 1 = 2.6 and ABC/Dwould be the only ones I would ever do that began as abstract expressions in search of subject matter. Quoth the raven, Nevermore. Meanwhile, there was still no theme for the quadripartite profile. What to write about?

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Draft No. 4: On the Writing Process»

Look at similar books to Draft No. 4: On the Writing Process. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Draft No. 4: On the Writing Process»

Discussion, reviews of the book Draft No. 4: On the Writing Process and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.