C. Ronald Garner - Alien Disclosure at Area 51: Dr. Dan Burisch Reveals the Truth About ETs, UFOs and MJ-12

Alien Disclosure at Area 51:

Dr. Dan Burisch Reveals the Truth
About ETs, UFOs and MJ-12

C. Ronald Garner

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT S

Mark McCandlish Artist / UFO Researcher

J.R. Moore Writer / Historian

Area51theTruth.com

Copyright 2008 C. Ronald Garner. All rights reserved.

No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or otherwise except as permitted under the 1976 United States Copyright Act without prior written permission of the publisher. Requests for permission should be emailed to C. Ronald Garner at ron@Area51theTruth.com

FIRST ELECTRONIC EDITION, December 2014

We seek the free flow of information a nation that is afraid to let the people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation afraid of its people. -John F. Kennedy, February 1962 speech at Columbia University

I have never met an alien, but I have met an extraterrestrial -Dan Burisch, PhD

The J-Rod rapidly approached and grabbed me as I fell to the grated flooring of the clean sphere. For the next 20-30 minutes until my fellow scientists could drag me from the clean sphere,(they didnt have secondary suits ready to immediately enter, and we were told before entering of the possible things that could go wrong), he flooded me with moving images, thoughts and dulled emotions. Some of the thoughts appeared more as metaphors than concretized reality. - Dan Burisch, PhD

Contents

Addendum 3:

Whether we like to think so or not, our government maintains many secrets, and despite some occasionally ludicrous cover stories, it protects selected information, objects, and certain people fairly well by a variety of means which much of the public would not hesitate to ascribe to more blatantly oppressive regimes but are reluctant to believe of our own system.

Some information must be protected from leaking out only temporarily, until some event or other technology trumps it or until time and circumstance render its importance obsolete. Other information must be kept for long periods. Among the safe guards against internal leaks is strict compartmentalization of knowledge. It is called need to know, and control is maintained by assuring that one is not informed of something he has no real need to know in order to do his job.

External leaks are usually prevented, quite simply, by stony silence or by cover stories. These include the gamut of misinformation dissemination policies, from outright denials to detailed fabrications, to partial explanations with judicial omissions. The policy also includes strong arm techniques, designed both to discourage investigation by personal intimidation and, in some cases, to neutralize those who have come into sensitive information through sources outside direct government control or who are deemed likely to go public with at least some version of these designated truths.

Every government must maintain a shroud of silence over some of its activities, as indeed we did with the Manhattan Project. This is undeniable by anyone who understands even a little about foreign policy, or who has experience with mediating contracts, or even who plays cards. It is nave to think that those who are responsible for negotiating American interests with foreign powers could achieve our goals if they showed their hand as each round is played. It isn't done in poker, or in war, seldom in business, and never in dealing with the iron men of oppressive juntas around the world. Indeed, even our extreme care in covering the activities of those working on the Manhattan Project in the 1940s was successfully penetrated by Soviet intelligence, thus initiating an arms race that, in effect, held the continued existence of the world itself hostage for the next 50 years.

However, the classification National Security has been used to cast a wide net, particularly since 9/11/01. The words constitute a suitably pliable abstraction, which allows the inclusion of all kinds of information the government, for any bureaucratic reason, might want suppressed, while the label sounds important to the public, broad in scope, and carries reassuring implications for our personal protection. It makes us feel good, while enabling intelligence interests to hide vast amounts of data from public scrutiny as well as from useful private research, much of it information to which we, as citizens of a supposedly free and open society, should be entitled.

One of the activities which the National Security secrecy policy has successfully kept under wraps until recently is that of Dr. Dan Burisch, PhD. We would not even know of the existence of Dr. Burisch for perhaps many years yet, if ever, had not certain powers within our government decided, for reasons of their own (and perhaps partially as a result of pressure brought by the revelations of increasingly sophisticated private researchers over many years) to initiate a quiet and calculated disclosure of his research and of his truly extraordinary experiences.

At this point it is probably safe to assume that this tentative, incremental move toward disclosure of some of the doctor's activities is purely experimental and is almost certainly being taken without unanimous internal approval. This is presumably to test public reaction to what, for huge numbers of people, will be utterly fantastic information. It will introduce to many a challenge to the integrity of entire, historic belief systems. Even this preliminary disclosure of what Dr. Burisch has been working on can indeed induce a global paradigm shift in human perception of our relationship with this and with other worlds.

This revelation, this tacit leak, is significant in the extreme. It not only constitutes the release of information of historically unprecedented significance to the whole world, some of which has been protected until now on pain of death, but it also represents a profound change in the upper echelon of those tasked with the guardianship of our deepest secrets. In addition, it means that highly placed officials within our black operations have come to feel that Dr. Dan Burisch, of all their people, can step forth from the shadows now as a trusted instrument of revelation. This rep-resents another sort of reversal in policy, too, for it now means that the official purging of the doctor's career records can and should be restored.

Ever since his recruitment into black ops at Area 51, (see Addendum 1) our super-secret military research base in the Nevada desert, elements of the government have undertaken a deliberate effort to erase from all records available in the public domain any and all accounts of the doctor's very existence. This is not uncommon in the case of an individual who has been recruited to work under deep cover, but it illustrates the extent of some of the effort undertaken to hide even the existence of personnel who carry in their heads information that, if known outside the relevant compartment of knowledge, might compromise even a scientific program which certain internal interests have designated as especially sensitive. Even his parents had been told that he was dead. They have since learned this was a clumsy lie.

Dr. Burisch is a highly skilled microscopist and microbiologist. In fact he was a prodigy in his youth to the extent that his gift for detecting tiny biological patterns under magnification attracted the attention of the government when he was barely twenty years old.