• Complain

Ellis - Breach of Trust

Here you can read online Ellis - Breach of Trust full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: New York, year: 2011;2014, publisher: Penguin Group US;Berkley Books, genre: Detective and thriller. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Breach of Trust
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Penguin Group US;Berkley Books
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2011;2014
  • City:
    New York
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Breach of Trust: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Breach of Trust" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

On the night his wife and infant daughter died, attorney Jason Kolarich was awaiting a call from an informant. He blames himself not only for the deaths of his family, but for the informants murder as well. Kolarich cant bring back his family, but he can find the person who killed the informant. And he discovers that his informants murder was only the tip of the iceberg-and that exposing the truth will drag him into the fight of his life.

Breach of Trust — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Breach of Trust" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Table of Contents ALSO BY DAVID ELLIS The Hidden Man Eye of the - photo 1
Table of Contents

ALSO BY DAVID ELLIS
The Hidden Man*

Eye of the Beholder

In the Company of Liars

Jury of One

Life Sentence

Line of Vision

*A Jason Kolarich Novel
To Julia Grace Ellis my little treasure Keep your friends close and your - photo 2
To Julia Grace Ellis, my little treasure
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
SUN-TZU, CHINESE GENERAL AND MILITARY STRATEGIST (ATTRIBUTED), FIFTH CENTURY B.C.

Unless your enemys wearing a wire.
CIRIACO CHARLIE CIMINO, POLITICAL FUNDRAISER, 2007
OPENING STATEMENT
I AM RECOUNTING THIS STORY IN CASE I AM NOT AROUND WHEN THE dust settles. If some unfortunate accident should befall me, as they say, and I am unable to testify, I want to have some account of what I did and why. I will not try to justify my actions. I could tell you that they made me do it, but thats hardly the point, and it may not be entirely accurate.
I wont lie to you, which is to say I will not deliberately mislead you. I will give you the most accurate account of events I can muster, but I cant promise it will be the truth. Truth is a matter of perspective, and if you dont believe me, then just watch how this whole thing plays out. Everyone who is a part of this story will tell a different version, when their time comes. In most of those versions, the hero will be whoever is telling the story.
In many of those versions, no doubt, the villain will be me.
TRIALS
March-June 2007
IF ERNESTO RAMIREZ HAD BEEN A BETTER LIAR, HED still be alive.
If he had told me right off the bat, or never given me the slightest indication that he had anything to tell me, I would have been on my merry way.
Joel Lightner was the private investigator. I was the lawyer. We were in Liberty Park, by which I mean not the southwest-side neighborhood bearing its name but the actual park itself, a city block of unhealthy grass and broken-down playground equipment, with a war-torn aluminum fence on the perimeter and a large wooden park district building with more graffiti on it than actual paint. The spray-painted gang insignia was an even split between the Columbus Street Cannibals and the Latin Lords. This was La Zona, disputed territory claimed by each of the gangs.
Almost two years ago to the day, exactly a half-mile straight west from this park, a small business owner named Adalbert Wozniak took five bullets to the chest, neck, and face. My client, State Senator Hector Almundo, was charged with his murder.
Nobody thought that Hector had pulled the trigger, of course. The Wozniak murder was part of a larger federal prosecution that went like this: Senator Almundo, harboring ambitions to be the states next attorney general, had cut a deal with the Cannibals street gang to shake down local businesses for monthly paymentsan old-fashioned street protection taxwhich the Cannibals then shared with Hectors campaign fund. The government figured that the take was roughly a fifty-fifty split between Hector and the Cannibals. That meant that, over an eighteen-month period, Citizens for Almundo took in about a hundred thousand dollars courtesy of the Cannibals extortion of local businesses.
Anyway, Wozniak was one of those business owners but refused to pay. The feds figured that the Cannibals decided to teach Wozniak a lesson and send a message to other like-minded dissenters that the street tax wasnt optional. The message was sent well enough that Wozniaks family couldnt have an open casket at his funeral.
But the feds charged the whole thing, from the shakedown to the murder, as a conspiracytheir favorite word, that onewhich meant that all of the crimes that were a part of the overall scheme could be attributed to all of the co-conspirators. Thus, State Senator Hector Almundo, as the supposed architect of the whole extortion scheme, was on the hook for the murder of Adalbert Wozniak, regardless of who pulled the trigger or who made the ultimate decision to pull it.
Joel Lightner and I passed a group of kids playing soccer, using anything they could finda stone, a brick, a backpackto frame their goals. I narrowly missed an appointment with a flying soccer ball, which made the kids howl in laughter almost in unison. I felt more than a decade and a half removed from that carefree bliss, having no other responsibility than to run around in a field chasing after a ball, though my sport was the American version of football.
Ernesto Ramirez was standing near the basketball court, in part observing and in part refereeing a four-on-four game of half-court hoops. The backboard was tattered and the rim had no net, but it didnt seem to dampen the enthusiasm of the kids, who looked to be ages six through mid-teens. Ernesto was shouting something to them in Spanish I couldnt place. I spoke the language pretty well but had trouble keeping up with native speakers.
We can talk right here, he said to us, which wasnt our preference but we didnt have any leverage over him. I wasnt used to that. Until recently, Id been a county prosecutor, where the failure to cooperate meant an arrest for obstruction.
It didnt take long to learn that Ramirez knew of Senator Almundo, the criminal case, and Adalbert Wozniak. I didnt know Wozniak, he said. He spoke well but it was clear that English was his second language.
Did you know Eddie Vargas? asked Lightner.
After Wozniaks murder, eyewitness accounts of the make and model of a Chevy sedan, together with partial license plate identification, led police to discover what they believed to be the killers vehicle in a dump several miles away. The feds used some of their fancy forensic technology to conclude, from sediment found within the tire tracks, that the vehicle had spent some time parked behind a housing project controlled by the Columbus Street Cannibals. They also found a print on the rearview mirror that belonged to a sixteen-year-old Cannibal recruit named Eddie Vargas. When the FBI raided Vargass home, they found a small pistol, a Kahr MK40, which could be mistaken for a metal spray nozzle on a garden hose, and which they confirmed was the murder weapon. Young Mr. Vargas has never been located and is strongly believed to have suffered an unfortunate accident of one kind or another, probably involving a machete, the Cannibals weapon of choice when silencing potential talkers. Bottom line, the feds had their shooter, and he was a Cannibal, but that shooter wouldnt be talking.
Ernesto Ramirez stared forward in the direction of the hoops game, but his eyes werent tracking the players or the movement of the ball. Hed drifted away momentarily at the mention of the name.
Eddie was a sixteen-year-old kid, he said. A sweet kid.
Though Ramirez was only thirty-two, his skin was weathered and his wavy dark hair was flecked with gray. He was a former Latin Lord member and drug addict who had managed to break free of both problems, but not without some residual wear. He spent his time these days running youth programs to provide alternatives to gangs. Eddie Vargas had been one of those youths.
He didnt shoot nobody, Ramirez added.
Lightner shrugged. The federal government is saying he did. Can you help us out?
Ramirezs jaw clenched and his left eye twitched. He was still making a show of watching that stupid basketball game. But I thought he was thinking. His mouth parted and his tongue moistened his lips, like he was on the verge of speaking.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Breach of Trust»

Look at similar books to Breach of Trust. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Breach of Trust»

Discussion, reviews of the book Breach of Trust and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.