• Complain

Lewis - Blind side: evolution of a game

Here you can read online Lewis - Blind side: evolution of a game full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2016;2010, publisher: W W Norton, genre: Detective and thriller. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Lewis Blind side: evolution of a game

Blind side: evolution of a game: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Blind side: evolution of a game" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Lewis: author's other books


Who wrote Blind side: evolution of a game? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Blind side: evolution of a game — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Blind side: evolution of a game" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
The Blind Side
The Blind Side

The Blind Side

The Blind Side
CHAPTER ONE

The Blind Side

BACK STORY

FROM THE SNAP of the ball to the snap of the first bone is closer to four seconds than to five. One Mississippi: The quarterback of the Washington Redskins, Joe Theismann, turns and hands the ball to running back John Riggins. He watches Riggins run two steps forward, turn, and flip the ball back to him. Its what most people know as a flea-flicker, but the Redskins call it a throw back special. Two Mississippi: Theismann searches for a receiver but instead sees Harry Carson coming straight at him. Its a runing downthe start of the second quarter, first and 10 at midfield, with the score tied 77and the New York Giants linebacker has been so completely suckered by the fake that hes deep in the Redskins backfield. Carson thinks hes come to tackle Riggins but Riggins is long gone, so Carson just keeps running, toward Theismann. Three Mississippi: Carson now sees that Theismann has the ball. Theismann notices Carson coming straight at him, and so he has time to avoid him. He steps up and to the side and Carson flies right on by and out of the play. The play is now 3.5 seconds old. Until this moment it has been defined by what the quarterback can see. Now itand heis at the mercy of what he cant see.

You dont think of fear as a factor in professional football. You assume that the sort of people who make it to the NFL are immune to the emotion. Perhaps they dont mind being hit, or maybe they just dont get scared; but the idea of pro football players sweating and shaking and staring at the ceiling at night worrying about the next days violence seems preposterous. The head coach of the Giants, Bill Parcells, didnt think it preposterous, however. Parcells, whose passion is the football defense, believed that fear played a big role in the game. So did his players. Theyd witnessed up close the response of opposing players to their own Lawrence Taylor.

The tackle who had just quit the Philadelphia Eagles, for instance. Jerry Sisemore had played tackle in the NFL for eight years when, in 1981, Taylor arrived. Sisemore played on the right side of the offensive line and Taylor usually came off the other end, but Sisemore still had to worry about the few times Taylor lined up across from him. Their teams were in the same NFL division and met twice each regular season. The week leading up to those games, Sisemore confessed, unnerved him. Towards the middle of the week something would come over you and youd just start sweating, he told the New York Times. My last year in the league, opening day, he immediately got past me. He just looked at me and laughed. Right there I thought I had to get out of this game. And after that season, 1984, he did.

The feelings of those assigned to prevent Taylor from hurting quarterbacks were trivial compared to those of the quarterbacks he wanted to hurt. In Taylors first season in the NFL, no official records were kept of quarterback sacks. In 1982, after Taylor had transformed the quarterback sack into the turning point of a football game, a new official NFL statistic was born. The record books defined the sack as tackling the quarterback behind the line of scrimmage as he attempts to pass. Taylor offered his own definition: A sack is when you run up behind somebody whos not watching, he doesnt see you, and you really put your helmet into him. The ball goes fluttering everywhere and the coach comes out and asks the quarterback, Are you all right? Thats a sack. After his first NFL season Taylor became the only rookie ever named the leagues most valuable defensive player, and he published a treatise on his art. I dont like to just wrap the quarterback, he explained. I really try to make him see seven fingers when they hold up three. Ill drive my helmet into him, or, if I can, Ill bring my arm up over my head and try to axe the sonuvabitch in two. So long as the guy is holding the ball, I intend to hurt him. If I hit the guy right, Ill hit a nerve and hell feel electrocuted, hell forget for a few seconds that hes on a football field.

The game of football evolved and here was one cause of its evolution, a new kind of athlete doing a new kind of thing. All by himself, Lawrence Taylor altered the environment and forced opposing coaches and players to adapt. After Taylor joined the team, the Giants went from the second worst defense in the NFL to the third best. The year before his debut they gave up 425 points; his first year they gave up 257 points. They had been one of the weakest teams in the NFL and were now, overnight, a contender. Of course, Taylor wasnt the only change in the New York Giants between 1980 and 1981. There was one other important newcomer, Bill Parcells, hired first to coach the Giants defense and then the entire team. Parcells became a connoisseur of the central nervous system of opposing quarterbacks. The symptoms induced by his sack-happy linebacker included, but were not restricted to: intimidation, lack of confidence, quick throws, nervous feet, concentration lapses, wanting to know where Lawrence is all the time. The players on the Giants defense picked up the same signals. As defensive back Beasley Reece told the New York Times, Ive seen quarterbacks look at Lawrence and forget the snap count. One opposing quarterback, finding himself under the center before the snap and unable to locate Taylor, called a time-out rather than run the playonly to find Taylor standing on the sidelines. I think I saw it more with the quarterbacks in our division, says Giants linebacker Harry Carson. They knew enough to be afraid. But every quarterback had a certain amount of fear when he played us.

By his fourth pro season Taylor was not just feeding these fears but feeding off them. They come to the line of scrimmage and the first thing they do is start looking for me, he said. I know, and they know. When theyd find me theyd start screaming: 56 left! 56 left! [Taylor wore No. 56.] So theres this thing I did. After the play was over Id come up behind them and whisper: dont worry where I am. Ill tell you when I get there.

A new force in pro football, Taylor demanded not just a tactical response but an explanation. Many people pointed to his unusual combination of size and speed. As one of the Redskins linemen put it, No human being should be six four, two forty-five, and run a four-five forty. Bill Parcells thought Taylors size and speed were closer to the beginning than to the end of the explanation. New York Giants scouts were scouring the country for young men six three or taller, 240 pounds or heavier, with speed. They could be found. In that pool of physical specimens what was preciousfar more precious than an inch, or ten pounds, or one tenth of a secondwas Taylors peculiar energy and mind: relentless, manic, with grandiose ambitions and private standards of performance. Parcells believed that even in the NFL a lot of players were more concerned with seeming to want to win than with actually winning, and that many of them did not know the difference. What they wanted, deep down, was to keep their jobs, make their money, and go home. Lawrence Taylor wanted to win. He expected more of himself on the field than a coach would dare to ask of any player.

Parcells accumulated lots of anecdotal evidence in support of his view of Taylors football character. One of his favorites involved these very same Washington Redskins. Joe Gibbs in a game in Giants Stadium basically decided that Taylor wasnt going to make any plays, said Parcells. He put two tight ends on Taylors sidealong with the left tackleand two wide receivers in the slot away from Taylor. This was extreme. An NFL football field is a tightly strung economy. Everything on it comes at a price. Take away from one place and you give to another. Three men blocking Taylor meant two Giants with no one to block them. Taylors effect on the game, which the Giants won, was not obvious but it was nonetheless great. But after the game, Parcells continued:

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Blind side: evolution of a game»

Look at similar books to Blind side: evolution of a game. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Blind side: evolution of a game»

Discussion, reviews of the book Blind side: evolution of a game and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.