• Complain

Jeffrey Toobin - The Oath: The Obama White House and the Supreme Court

Here you can read online Jeffrey Toobin - The Oath: The Obama White House and the Supreme Court full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2012, publisher: Doubleday, genre: Detective and thriller. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover

The Oath: The Obama White House and the Supreme Court: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Oath: The Obama White House and the Supreme Court" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

From the prizewinning author of The Nine, a gripping insiders account of the momentous ideological war between the John Roberts Supreme Court and the Obama administration.
From the moment John Roberts, the chief justice of the United States, blundered through the Oath of Office at Barack Obamas inauguration, the relationship between the Supreme Court and the White House has been confrontational. Both men are young, brilliant, charismatic, charming, determined to change the course of the nationand completely at odds on almost every major constitutional issue. One is radical; one essentially conservative. The surprise is that Obama is the conservativea believer in incremental change, compromise, and pragmatism over ideology. Robertsand his allies on the Courtseek to overturn decades of precedent: in short, to undo the ultimate victory FDR achieved in the New Deal.
This ideological war will crescendo during the 2011-2012 term, in which several landmark cases are on the Courts docketmost crucially, a challenge to Obamas controversial health-care legislation. With four new justices joining the Court in just five years, including Obamas appointees Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, this is a dramaticallyand historicallydifferent Supreme Court, playing for the highest of stakes.
No one is better positioned to chronicle this dramatic tale than Jeffrey Toobin, whose prize-winning bestseller The Nine laid bare the inner workings and conflicts of the Court in meticulous and entertaining detail. As the nation prepares to vote for President in 2012, the future of the Supreme Court will also be on the ballot.

Jeffrey Toobin: author's other books


Who wrote The Oath: The Obama White House and the Supreme Court? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Oath: The Obama White House and the Supreme Court — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Oath: The Obama White House and the Supreme Court" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Copyright 2012 by Jeffrey Toobin All rights reserved Published in the United - photo 1
Copyright 2012 by Jeffrey Toobin All rights reserved Published in the United - photo 2

Copyright 2012 by Jeffrey Toobin

All rights reserved. Published in the United States by Doubleday, a division of Random House, Inc., New York, and in Canada by Random House of Canada Limited, Toronto.

www.doubleday.com

DOUBLEDAY and the portrayal of an anchor with a dolphin are registered trademarks of Random House, Inc.

A portion of this work was previously published in slightly different form in The New Yorker.

Jacket design by John Fulbrook III
Jacket photographs: President Obama Kwaku Alston/Corbis Outline;
Justice Roberts Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images;
columns Jurgen Vogt/Getty Images

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Toobin, Jeffrey.
The oath : the Obama White House and the Supreme Court / Jeffrey Toobin.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references.
1. United States. Supreme CourtHistory21st century. 2. United StatesPolitics and government2009 3. Constitutional historyUnited States. 4. Political questions and judicial powerUnited StatesHistory21st century. 5. Obama, Barack. 6. Roberts, John G., 1955 I. Title.
KF8742.T66 2012
347.7326090512dc23 2012029205

eISBN: 978-0-385-53630-1

v3.1

To McIntosh, of course

CONTENTS
PROLOGUE THE OATHS S o let me ask you this Greg Craig said does anyone - photo 3

PROLOGUE
THE OATHS S o let me ask you this Greg Craig said does anyone there think - photo 4
THE OATHS

S o let me ask you this, Greg Craig said, does anyone there think hes not the president?

It was about 10:30 on the morning of January 21, 2009. Craig was settling into his first day of work as counsel to the president when he received an unexpected phone call.

David Barron was on the line. He, too, had just reported for duty, as the second-in-command in the Office of Legal Counsel, which served as the in-house legal team for the attorney generaldesignate, Eric Holder.

In the excitement and chaos of the previous daywhen Barack Obama was sworn in as the forty-fourth president of the United Statesneither Craig nor Barron had paid much attention to the peculiar way Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. had administered the oath of office. Early the next morning, Barron had read several newspaper articles about the botched oath and decided to look into the issue. He was concerned enough about what he found to place the call to Craig.

So was Obama really the president?

Barrons answer was, well, complicated.

The Constitution for the most part speaks in majestic generalities and employs the first personI and myin only a single provision. Article II, Section 1, states: Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

Article I of the Constitution, which defines the powers of Congress, is more than twice as long as Article II, about the presidency. This difference reflected the framers belief that the legislative branch of government would be the most powerful. (Article III, which creates the judicial branch, is just 376 words, half again as short as Article II.) Still, the inclusion of a formal oath in the constitutional text reflected the importance of the presidencyand, more to the point, the president. It is the only oath spelled out in the Constitution. In contrast, the vice presidential oath was established by act of Congress, and the current version has been in use only since 1884.

The model for the framers was Englands Coronation Oath, which had been promulgated in 1689, but the differences between the two oaths were as significant as the similarities. The King had to swear before a bishop or archbishop in the Church of England; there was no such requirement in the United States, and George Washington began the tradition of judicial administration of the oath in 1789. New York chancellor Robert Livingston conducted the first inauguration. (At that point, of course, Washington had not had the chance to nominate anyone to the Supreme Court, and it was four years later that a justice, William Cushing, swore in Washington for his second term.) The ecumenical nature of the presidential oath is reflected also in the option of swear (or affirm). Some Christian sects, notably the Quakers, did not believe in the use of the word swearing, so the Constitution made sure they were not excluded. (Only Franklin Pierce, in 1853, chose to affirm his presidential oath.)

Many of the traditions associated with the inauguration began with Washington, as the first president knew they would. As the first of everything in our situation will serve to establish a precedent, it is devoutly wished on my part that these precedents may be fixed on true principles, Washington wrote to James Madison shortly after his inauguration. On the occasion, which took place April 30, 1789, on the steps of Federal Hall, in lower Manhattan, Washington took the oath from a judge, not a cleric; he wore civilian garb, not a military uniform; he placed his hand on a Bible as he recited the words; he gave a brief, inspirational speech immediately after the ceremony; he made sure that any citizen who so desired could attend and view the swearing in. Washington Irving, who was six years old in 1789 but apparently a spectator at the inauguration, recounted in the 1850s that the new president had concluded the oath by saying, So help me God. No contemporary account mentioned Washingtons use of that phrase, and it remains unclear whether he did. In any event, all modern presidents have chosen to follow the oath with those words.

Like many other aspects of American government, the administration of the presidential oath evolved in a haphazard manner. In 1797, Oliver Ellsworth became the first chief justice to administer the oath (to John Adams), and thus the tradition began of the nations highest legal officer performing the honors. But sometimes he didnt. (John Tyler and Millard Fillmore were sworn in by lower court judges.) Assassinations led to improvisations. Following the murder of James A. Garfield, in 1881, Chester A. Arthur was sworn in by a judge of the New York Supreme Court; following William McKinleys death, in 1901, Theodore Roosevelt took the oath from a federal district court judge. Most famously, Sarah T. Hughes, a federal district judge in Texas, administered the oath to Lyndon B. Johnson, on Air Force One, on November 22, 1963. Sentiment sometimes played a part, too. Calvin Coolidge took the oath from a lowly notary publicJohn C. Coolidge, his father. In 1933, Franklin D. Roosevelt recited the full oath without interruption by Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes.

Notwithstanding the constitutional text, the precise words of the oath varied over time. When Chief Justice William Howard Taft swore in Herbert Hoover in 1929, he said, preserve, maintain, and defend the Constitution. The error was largely ignored at the time, but a thirteen-year-old girl who had been listening on the radio wrote to the chief justice about it. Taft responded, and disclosed still another, earlier mistake. When I was sworn in as President by Chief Justice Fuller, he made a similar slip, Taft wrote to the girl, Helen Terwilliger, but in those days when there was no radio, it was observed only in the Senate chamber where I took the oath. You are mistaken in your report of what I did say. What I said was preserve, maintain and protect. You may attribute the variation to the defect of an old mans memory. In 1945, Harlan Fiske Stone began the oath with I, Harry Shipp Truman Truman, who had a middle initial but no middle name, responded, I, Harry S Truman Twenty years later, Lyndon Johnson forgot to raise his right hand until halfway through the oath, and Chief Justice Earl Warren said office of the Presidency, not President.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Oath: The Obama White House and the Supreme Court»

Look at similar books to The Oath: The Obama White House and the Supreme Court. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Oath: The Obama White House and the Supreme Court»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Oath: The Obama White House and the Supreme Court and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.