• Complain

Chris Matthews - Tip and the Gipper: When Politics Worked

Here you can read online Chris Matthews - Tip and the Gipper: When Politics Worked full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2013, publisher: Simon & Schuster, genre: Detective and thriller. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Chris Matthews Tip and the Gipper: When Politics Worked

Tip and the Gipper: When Politics Worked: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Tip and the Gipper: When Politics Worked" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

TIP AND THE GIPPER is a magnificent personal history of a time when two great political opponents served together for the benefit of the country. Chris Matthews was an eyewitness to this story as a top aide to Speaker of the House Tip ONeill, who waged a principled war of political ideals with President Reagan from 1980 to 1986. Together, the two men forged compromises that shaped Americas future and became one of historys most celebrated political pairingsthe epitome of how ideological opposites can get things done.
When Ronald Reagan was elected to the presidency in a landslide victory over Jimmy Carter (for whom Matthews had worked as a speechwriter), Speaker ONeill realized Americans had voted for a change. For the first time in his career, ONeill also found himself thrust into the national spotlight as the highest-ranking leader of the Democratic Partythe most visible and respected challenger to President Reagans agenda of shrinking the government and lowering taxes.
At first, ONeill doubted his ability to compete on the public stage with the charming Hollywood actor, whose polished speeches played well on TV, a medium ONeill had never mastered. Over time, the burly Irishman learned how to fight the popular president on his key issues, relying on legislative craftiness, strong rhetoric, and even guerrilla theater. An old dog can learn new tricks, Tip told his staff. Of ONeill, one of his colleagues said, If Martians came into the House chamber, theyd know instantly who the leader was.
Meanwhile, President Reagan proved to be a much more effective and savvy leader than his rivals had ever expected, achieving major legislative victories on taxes and the federal budget. Reagan and his allies knew how to work the levers of power in Washington. After showing remarkable personal fortitude in the wake of the assassination attempt against him, Reagan never let his political differences with Democrats become personal. He was fond of the veteran Speakers motto that political battles ended at 6 p.m. So when he would phone ONeill, he would say, Hello, Tip, is it after six oclock?
Together, the two leaders fought over the major issues of the daywelfare, taxes, covert military operations, and Social Securitybut found their way to agreements that reformed taxes, saved Social Security, and achieved their common cause of bringing peace to Northern Ireland. ONeills quiet behind-the-scenes support helped Reagan forge his historic Cold Warending bond with Mikhail Gorbachev. They each won some and lost some, and through it all they maintained respect for each others positions and worked to advance the country rather than obstruct progress.
As Matthews notes, There is more than one sort of heroic behavior, and they dont all look the same. Tip and the Gipper is the story of the kind of heroism we need today.

Chris Matthews: author's other books


Who wrote Tip and the Gipper: When Politics Worked? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Tip and the Gipper: When Politics Worked — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Tip and the Gipper: When Politics Worked" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Thank you for downloading this Simon Schuster eBook Join our mailing list - photo 1

Thank you for downloading this Simon & Schuster eBook.


Join our mailing list and get updates on new releases, deals, bonus content and other great books from Simon & Schuster.

C LICK H ERE T O S IGN U P


or visit us online to sign up at
eBookNews.SimonandSchuster.com

CONTENTS DEATH OF A PRESIDENCY STARTING OUT STARRING RONALD REAGAN NEW KID ON - photo 2
CONTENTS

DEATH OF A PRESIDENCY

STARTING OUT

STARRING RONALD REAGAN

NEW KID ON THE BLOCK

JOINING THE FIGHT

THE LORD IS MY SHEPHERD

RONALD REAGANS JOURNEY

THE RISE OF TIP ONEILL

HERO

FIGHTING SEASON

BATTLEFIELD PROMOTION

TURNING

SUMMIT

PARTNERS

TIP AT THE TOP

DEAL

LEBANON AND GRENADA

VICTORY AND SURVIVAL

MIKHAIL GORBACHEV

HURRAH!

COMMON GROUND

LAST BATTLE

LEGACY


Dedicated to the memory of:

L. Kirk ODonnell

and

Michael K. Deaver


There is nothing I love as much as a good fight.

F RANKLIN D. R OOSEVELT

PREFACE

Visitors to Washington are taken with its quiet grandeur. Just like they saw in the postcards, they witness the beauty of the Mall stretching from one horizon to the other. They see the Capitol itself up there on its hill, pay respects to the beloved Lincoln sitting high in his memorial, and gaze like children at the tall, clean obelisk honoring the citys namesake.

The truth is, no loud commerce or clanking industry disturbs the peace; no smokestacks darken the skies even in the distance. Tourists, generally speaking, are respectful rather than boisterous. Even the bureaucracy, busy along its daytime corridors, fails to shatter the stillness. Yet for all the statues and monuments loyally attesting to whats gone before, Washington is very much a living city.

And what makes it so is its jamboree of human voices engaged in discourse, debates, discussion, argument, compromise, leaks, gossip, criticism, and commentary, not to mention speechmaking. Undeniably the citys signature output, its been this way since General Washington and Pierre LEnfant together on horseback envisioned our new nations capital in the late eighteenth century. Its a place where talking matters, and even more important, whos talking to whom.

Since the moment of its creation the city has been marked in every era by voices. Year in and year out, the questions they hurl into the air lie at the center of the American conversation, and this ritual of the voices is what animates our government.

And always there come the responding questions from the country: Shall the people hold sway? Will the winning faction deliver on its promises? Will the losing faction give way? Will a divided electorate see a spirit of compromise? These are the recurring quandaries that separate action from stalemate, a working democracy from one seized by dysfunction.

The framers of the American Constitution, who also made Washington the capital, established two great offices. One is the president of the United States; the other, the Speaker of the House of Representatives. The role of the first is to lead the country; the province of the Speaker, through custom and his prerogative to set the House agenda, is to control the governments purse strings. Not a dollar can be allocated that the Congress hasnt guaranteed by law or specifically appropriated.

This historic arrangement makes simple human bargaining a central task for the two leaders. The check-and-balance relationship between president and Speaker can either propel the government forward or not. Put plainly, they either talk, or they dont. When they join in alliance, the government rumbles ahead. When their interests collide, somethings got to give. Either one side prevails, or a compromise is struck. Otherwise, the republic stalls.

This means that, for the Constitution to work, the two must be open to the larger picture, to resist base obstructionism, to accommodate differences for the common good. Historically, this coupling of president and Speaker has been a tricky one that encourages a choreography both quick-footed and wary.

I was witness, with eye and heart, to one of the most celebrated of these pairings. The time was the 1980s, the president was Ronald Reagan, and the Speaker was Thomas P. ONeill, Jr. Both were Irish-Americans. Both men were larger than life. The former was a California conservative Republican, elected in a landslide. He arrived in Washington to his very first job there, walking into the White House on Inauguration Day 1981. The latter was a New England liberal Democrat, a hardened, blooded Washington veteran whod entered the House of Representatives in 1953 and had spent the twenty-eight years since finessing and cajoling his way to the top of the Hill.

The outsider and the insider: these two moved together in a remarkable, if sometimes rough, tandem. They argued mightily, each man belting out his separate, deeply cherished political philosophybut then they would, both together, bow to the countrys judgment. Decisions were made, action taken, outcomes achieved. They honored the voters, respected the others role. Each liked to beat the other guy, not sabotage him.

During this period, government met its deadlines. Members of Congress listened and acted. Debates led to solutions. Shutdowns were averted. What needed to proceed did, and Americas citizens were the beneficiaries.

Ronald Reagan and Tip ONeill were definite political rivals. Just not always.

People in politics, like everyone else, like to talk about how different things were in the old days. They point to the relationship between President Reagan and Tip ONeillold-school guys, only two years apart in age, who were so different yet not, on some level, that differentwhose commitment to comity came out of their shared integrity. They disagreed on the role of government, knew it, admitted it face-to-face. But they put concentrated effort into trying to get along even as they challenged each other. Why, we wonder, cant it be that way again?

Why wont our leaders work to accommodate each other, employing civility as they cooperate to accomplish goals in the countrys best interests? Why must we continue to suffer their relentless gumming up of the works? What in our national character, in the ways we choose to deal with one another and respect different viewpoints, has changed so since the days of Reagan and ONeill? How can we win back the faith that our republic is working?

Today we have government by tantrum. Rather than true debate, we get the daily threat of filibuster. Shutdowns are engineered as standard procedure. In place of hard-earned statecraft we witness new tricks of the trade. Presidents make recess appointments to end-run Senate consent. Tea Partyers in the House of Representatives act as if voting Nay constitutes twenty-first-century governance. Democrats in the Senate, for a while, refused to approve the annual budgetwithholding consent to skip the embarrassment of admitting dire fiscal reality. Brinkmanship grabs todays headlines even as public faith dies a little with each disappointing eleventh-hour deal.

Whats to be done? I truly believe it doesnt have to be this way. And the story Im about to tell of these two extraordinary figures will show you why. My goal is to bring you the true account of what took place. Our country is less in need of a myth than a real-life account of one imperfect leader dealing with another. It serves no purpose in this time of habitual conflict to spin a tale of happy harmony; far better to illustrate how two very different figures managed to make politics work.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Tip and the Gipper: When Politics Worked»

Look at similar books to Tip and the Gipper: When Politics Worked. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Tip and the Gipper: When Politics Worked»

Discussion, reviews of the book Tip and the Gipper: When Politics Worked and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.