Dean T. Hartwell - Planes without Passengers. The Faked Hijackings of 9/11

This book includes the original Planes without Passengers and adds the authors new work presented at the Vancouver Hearings June 20

Copyright 2012 by Dean T. Hartwell

All rights reserved.

ISBN: 0-9709070-5-2

Kindle Version

Available from Amazon.com and other retailers

Table of Contents

Preface to Original Planes without Passengers

Introduction

Why the Official Theory Is False

The Foundation of My Theory:

Bureau of Transportation Statistics

American Airlines Flights 11 and 77

United Flights 175 and 93

Flight 89: The Ke y to Understanding Flight 175

The Real Terrorists

Summation

Dead or Alive? How to Decide

Passenger Fiction

New Information for 2nd Editio n

Fact s about the Flights

The Cleveland Question: Was It the

Final Destination of the Passengers?

Challenge: Finding Falsifiable Assertion s

The Mayor and the Media Created

the Cleveland Airplane Mystery

Timeline

Afterword

Also by Dean T. Hartwell

Truth Matters: How the Voters Can Take Back Their Nation

Dead Men Talking: Consequences of Government Lies

Facts Talk but the Guilty Walk: the 9/11 No Hijacker Theory and Its Indictment of Our Leaders

For Deans latest writings, go to http://deanhartwell.weebly.com

Preface

I do not know if we can ever discover the whole truth about 9/11. I simply present my work as a report that tells what most likely happened to the planes and passengers associated with the event. I have limited my scope to ascertaining what planes were used, how they were used and the ro le that the passengers played.

One reading my work will NOT find out, for example, what hit the World Trade Center buildings or the Pentagon. These and other issues like it are best left to those with specific scientific knowledge and aptitude.

We are about to observe the tenth anniversary of this horrific event and attention given to it may never be higher for all we now know. It is simply a matter of catching that attention while I can.

So now that I have your attention, here is my hope for you: T ake this book seriously enough to read it and critically enough to challenge it.

What distinguishes this book from others on 9/11?
The book takes risks to present its case to the reader. For instance, by suggesting that the passengers were not victims but rather people who knew something about the plot ahead of time will not make this book popular for those who find this sort of talk unsettling. I follow what I sincerely believe to be the truth knowing that the truth is not always kind because I want to know what happened to the passengers.
What led me to write this book?

In the ten years since the events of September 11, 2001, I have seen those events from different angles. Until 2005, I never seriously questioned the official version of nineteen Al-Qaeda hijackers and four flights of passengers smashing into landmark buildings and into the ground in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. After reading books by David Ray Griffin , Michael Ruppert and others, I started to formulate questions about the Bush Administration's handling of the events.

By 2006, I started to write critically of the official story, citing, among other things, the Bush Administration's failure to keep its initial promise to provide proof of Osama bin Laden's guilt. The following year, I wrote a long essay about Vice President Cheney's involvement in the crimes of 9/11. This essay, "Indictment of Conspiracy," became a chapter in a book I published in August 2009 Dead Men Talking: Consequences of Government Lies , which also criticized the official theories of the Kennedy brother murders.

R eaders of my previous efforts, such as Dead Men Talking and the essay Misdirection: Following the Plot, Execution and Cover-up of 9/11 Crimes , will note that I have changed my point of view on some issues. Truth seeking is usually a process of sorting through assertions and I made it a point to post my essays (the drafts of this book) on the Internet to get feedback from people with differing viewpoints, some of which began to appeal to me.

Since the publication of Dead Men Talking , I have focused upon what happened to the planes and the passengers. My key determination was the significance of Bureau of Transportation records indicating that, of the four alleged flights, only United 175 , which allegedly hit the south tower of the World Trade Center, and United 93 , which allegedly crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, were scheduled and recorded as having taken off that day.

The Burden of Proof Is on Me

As I have selected the topic and have chosen to indict the official theory with my accusations, I accept the burden of proof. In general, I will prove that no passengers were hijacked or killed on September 11, 2001.

Specifically, as a way to prove this proposition, I will answer the following questions and more:

How many planes were used in the plot?

Which ones had passengers and which ones did not?

What happened to passengers from these flights after they left the planes?

So here I am with the best story that I have come up with yet about the issues that I believe are most important. The reader is invited to think critically and make their own conclusion.

My special thanks to Professor Jim Fetzer, Bill Giltner and Nick Hill for their help.

Introduction

In determining what happened on 9/11, I first consider key aspects of the official report. I conclude that there are too many falsehoods and I disregard the official theory and start from scratch. I then make a number of conclusions, most notably the assertion that no hijackers participated.

I rely upon Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) records, which indicate clearly that two of the flights associated with 9/11, United 175 and United 93, were scheduled to fly that day and that the other two flights, American 11 and American 77, were not scheduled.

The BTS records are half of the key to determining where the planes went. The other half is the proof that none of the targets ( World Trade Centers One and Two, the Pentagon and Shanksville) were struck by any planes resembling the ones allegedly used for these four flights.

I have established a series of if-then propositions which have guided my framing of evidence as to the planes and passengers. My initial analysis of each proposition follows:

IF Flights 11 and 77 were not scheduled, then they may have been planes without passengers, such as decoy planes

IF they were scheduled, then there were likely passengers on all four planes

Plotters may well have used plane flight numbers that were not scheduled on September 11 th . But even if the plotters arranged to use unscheduled flights, how would the passengers have learned of them without being suspicious or without being involved?

Of course there are plane manifests which state which persons were scheduled to be on the flights in question. There is also some evidence of tickets bought by the some of the alleged passengers, evidence of boarding passes for Flight 93, but no authenticated videotape from surveillance from any of the airports where the alleged passengers left from.

I feel confident that passengers named in the manifests actually boarded Flight 93 to go to San Francisco and feel fairly certain as to Flight 175. As to the other flights, it is hard to give credibility to a manifest from unscheduled flights. It is more logical to refer to the passengers of Flights 11 and 77 as having been associate d with them .