• Complain

Daglish - Over the Battlefield: Operation Goodwood

Here you can read online Daglish - Over the Battlefield: Operation Goodwood full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Havertown, year: 2008;2013, publisher: Pen and Sword, genre: History. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Daglish Over the Battlefield: Operation Goodwood
  • Book:
    Over the Battlefield: Operation Goodwood
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Pen and Sword
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2008;2013
  • City:
    Havertown
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Over the Battlefield: Operation Goodwood: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Over the Battlefield: Operation Goodwood" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Copyright Page; Title Page; Dedication; Table of Contents; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS; FOREWORD; NOTES ON TERMINOLOGY; Chapter 1 -- JULY, 1944: THE OPPONENTS; BRITISH STRATEGY; GERMAN STRATEGY; GERMAN DISPOSITIONS; THE PLAN OF ATTACK; ROBERTS AND HIS ORDERS; References; Chapter 2 -- MID-JULY: THE APPROACH TO BATTLE; CROSSING THE ORNE; ROADS AND BRIDGES; ACROSS COUNTRY; PROBLEMS; DECEPTIONS, DELUSIONS, DIVERSIONS; THE CROSSING; FORMING UP; References; Chapter 3 -- 18 JULY, DAWN: THE BOMBING; THE ARTILLERY SHORTFALL; WAITING AND WATCHING; THE BOMBING SHORTFALL; HEAVY BOMBERS OVER THE BATTLEFIELD.;For the first book in our new series Over The Battlefield, we have chosen Ian Daglish to describe the events of Operation GOODWOOD, July 1944, the dramatic attempted British armored breakout from the Normandy bridge-head. This was the greatest armored battle undertaken by the British during the Second World War. What is so special about this book is the discovery and use of superb aerial photos taken during the fighting by the RAF. This amazing imagery makes it possible to trace the course of the battle and to track the movement of the armored regiments and troops of both sides. The effect is s.

Daglish: author's other books


Who wrote Over the Battlefield: Operation Goodwood? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Over the Battlefield: Operation Goodwood — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Over the Battlefield: Operation Goodwood" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author remains deeply indebted to - photo 1
Table of Contents

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The author remains deeply indebted to the many historians and old soldiers who have made the lengthy process of researching this book such a rewarding experience.

Thanks are extended to the custodians of the primary material so valuable to researchers: David Fletcher, Historian at The Tank Museum, Bovington; Allan Williams, Air Photo Archive Manager at The Aerial Reconnaissance Archive (TARA) at Keele University; David Porter at the Tactical Doctrine Retrieval Cell (TDRC); Peter Elliott at the RAF Museum, Hendon; and Stephen Walton, Archivist at the Imperial War Museum, Duxford. Though sadly stripped of its time-honoured title of Public Record Office, the National Archives at Kew remains despite its drab and utilitarian new name a vital asset: its staff as helpful as ever and its treasures no less valuable. Alderley Edge Library has consistently triumphed in locating rare and out-of-print works needed by the author. Personal insights have come from several former soldiers on both sides of the action: Bill Close and Jim Caswell of 3rd Royal Tank Regiment; Richard Freiherr von Rosen and Alfred Rubbel of 503. schwere Panzer-Abteilung ; Patrick Delaforce and Denis Handford of 13th Royal Horse Artillery. Further help has come from the growing body of keen historians striving to solve the remaining puzzles of the Normandy campaign: Alain Verwicht, Didier Lodieu, Bernard Paiche, and Jean-Claude Perrigault. Charles Markuss has freely shared his comprehensive knowledge of the German Army; both he and Friedrich Tichy have assisted with German nomenclature and translations. Very special thanks are extended to Kevin Baverstock, cartographer and Normandy historian, for his continued encouragement and image processing expertise.

Philippe Wirton graciously granted access to his collection of battlefield photographs taken shortly after GOODWOOD. Simon Trew, Christopher Dunphie, and Bob Eburne contributed GOODWOOD maps. Norman Godfrey of 16 Squadron permitted the photograph reproduced on page 268. The author is grateful to Her Majestys Stationery Office for permission to use Crown Copyright material. Photographs on pages 93, 95, and 96 are reproduced by permission of The Tank Museum. Aerial images based on photographs taken as the battle was fought below are Crown Copyright 1944/MOD, reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majestys Stationery Office.

Lastly, particular thanks go to two individuals whose recollections and wisdom have helped to shape this book: Jimmy Taylor of 16 Squadron, Royal Air Force; and Geoffrey Stone, of 11th Armoured Division APIS (Air Photo Interpretation Section).

APPENDIX I
THE GOODWOOD BATTLEGROUND

Each of the three Allied corps taking part in the GOODWOOD battle was destined to fight over distinctly different terrain. The main thrust on 18 July was to run southwards across a flat plain interspersed with small villages and orchards. Meanwhile, on either flank, more-or-less separate battles were to be fought over contrasting landscape. To the east lay wooded hills; to the west a built-up area characterized by factories, railways, rubbled town and suburbs, and crossed by a deep river.

MISCONCEPTIONS

This author was first moved to write about GOODWOOD upon visiting the battlefield and realising that his mental picture of the battleground, based on published accounts, was far from accurate. Even after reading a great many studies of the battle, the reality still held surprises.

Just as familiarity with the terrain assists understanding the battle, so can ignorance of it lead to wrong deductions. One account of GOODWOOD written soon after the war mistakenly blamed the Normandy bocage for stopping the British: It was the hedgerow country that lost Montgomery the battle The hedgerows won over the individual courage and brilliance of soldiers who had survived Africa but who did not understand the terrain in which they now fought. The writer may be entitled to his opinion that Montgomery lost the battle; some would disagree. But his comments betray a lack of knowledge of both the soldiers and the terrain. As far as GOODWOOD is concerned, only a small percentage of VIII Corps tank crews were desert veterans, and the ground was largely open. Ironically, and rarely mentioned, there were indeed some stretches of substantial hedgerow crossing the GOODWOOD battlefield; far from hindering, these served to offer the advancing British very welcome protection from German fire.

Even apparently authoritative documents have promulgated similar misconceptions. The BAOR Battlefield Tour document both state: Between the villages the ground is completely open with no banks or hedges and very few fences. (The two documents are virtually contemporary, with no indication which came first.) Little wonder that old soldiers relying on memory might omit mention of such, officially non-existent, features in their memoirs; nor that later writers unfamiliar with the actual terrain have accepted such statements without question.

THE ARMOURED CORRIDOR

The main thrust of Operation GOODWOOD was to run southward, down an open corridor between the industry and suburbs of Caen and the foot of the Bois de Bavent. Most of this was, and remains, rich arable farmland, dotted with substantial, prosperous farm complexes and the occasional small village clustered around a Norman stone church. Today the villages are larger, but the overall feel of the countryside is little changed.

Standing near the 18 July Start Line, the overall impression remains one of wide-open country. In the direction of the armoured advance, flat fields extend as far as the eye can see. Only as one moves further south does it become evident that the distant southern horizon lies on an elevated ridge. Indeed, from the Start Line near Escoville the Bourgubus ridge lies all of eleven kilometres distant, yet barely forty metres higher. This open aspect of the land east of the Orne contrasted with the dense bocage country to the west, which had caused so many unexpected difficulties in the first six weeks of the Normandy campaign.

Apart from the industrial estates of Caen which nowadays spread across the western flank of the armoured corridor, the most conspicuous change from 1944 to be noted on a summer s day is the appearance of the modern crops. Todays much-modified strains are designed to direct more of their energy into the edible crop rather than the stem; in 1944 the ripening corn stood much taller. One point which the Battlefield Tour states entirely correctly is that during the battle, the crops were shoulder high and it was hard to locate such field defences as were sited in the intervening ground. Then, as in all previous summertime battles of European history, wheat grew to the height of a mans shoulder or higher. On a largely flat battleground, this was important.

The ground is well drained. Once the two parallel waterways of the Caen Canal and the Orne River had been crossed, the armoured corridor presented no significant water obstacles. The GOODWOOD planners hoped that the two railways running across the path of the advance would similarly present little problem. This hope was to be disappointed.

The first railway, the single-track line from Caen to Troarn, no longer exists, though most of its path along the northern side of the N175 highway from Mondeville to Banneville is still clearly visible. Aerial photographs and pre-war maps failed to show that much of the length of this railway lay on a small embankment, between one and two metres, and in parts borded by ditches and hedges. This was to prove utterly impassable to wheeled vehicles, and a stiff challenge for half-tracks and the light, tracked carriers. Even tanks occasionally had their tracks damaged by crossing the metal rails, until Royal Engineers could come forward and bulldoze earth over the lines. In itself this obstacle was only a minor hindrance, but encountered at an early stage of the advance it caused hold-ups and bunching as vehicles queued for the few level crossings.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Over the Battlefield: Operation Goodwood»

Look at similar books to Over the Battlefield: Operation Goodwood. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Over the Battlefield: Operation Goodwood»

Discussion, reviews of the book Over the Battlefield: Operation Goodwood and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.