Broughton - Wikipedia Readers Guide: The Missing Manual
Here you can read online Broughton - Wikipedia Readers Guide: The Missing Manual full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Sebastopol, Calif, year: 2008, publisher: OReilly Media, genre: Home and family. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:
Romance novel
Science fiction
Adventure
Detective
Science
History
Home and family
Prose
Art
Politics
Computer
Non-fiction
Religion
Business
Children
Humor
Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.
- Book:Wikipedia Readers Guide: The Missing Manual
- Author:
- Publisher:OReilly Media
- Genre:
- Year:2008
- City:Sebastopol, Calif
- Rating:3 / 5
- Favourites:Add to favourites
- Your mark:
Wikipedia Readers Guide: The Missing Manual: summary, description and annotation
We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Wikipedia Readers Guide: The Missing Manual" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.
Abstract: Wikipedia Readers Guide: The Missing Manual gives you the essential tools for getting the most out of Wikipedia. As a supplement to Wikipedia: The Missing Manual, this handbook provides a basic road map to the largest online collaborative encyclopedia. Youll learn the best ways to search Wikipedia for the information you need, how to navigate the encyclopedia by category, and what to do if you spot an error in an article
Broughton: author's other books
Who wrote Wikipedia Readers Guide: The Missing Manual? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.
Wikipedia Readers Guide: The Missing Manual — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work
Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Wikipedia Readers Guide: The Missing Manual" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
Beijing Cambridge Farnham Kln Sebastopol Tokyo
If you purchased this ebook directly from oreilly.com, you have the following benefits:
DRM-free ebooksuse your ebooks across devices without restrictions or limitations
Multiple formatsuse on your laptop, tablet, or phone
Lifetime access, with free updates
Dropbox syncingyour files, anywhere
If you purchased this ebook from another retailer, you can upgrade your ebook to take advantage of all these benefits for just $4.99. to access your ebook upgrade.
Please note that upgrade offers are not available from sample content.
John Broughton has been a registered editor at Wikipedia since August 2005, with more than 15,000 edits by the time he wrote this book. His biggest Wikipedia endeavor has been the Editors index to Wikipedia (just type that in the search box at the left of any Wikipedia page). This index lists every important reference page on Wikipedia, as well as hundreds of off-Wikipedia Web pages with useful information and tools for Wikipedia editors.
Johns first experience with programming computers was in a 1969 National Science Foundation program. Since then, hes held various computer-related management positions in the headquarters of a U.S. Army Reserve division, worked in internal audit departments as a Certified Information Systems Auditor, and was the Campus Y2K Coordinator at U.C. Berkeley.
A Certified Management Accountant, John has a B.S. in Mathematical Sciences from Johns Hopkins University; an M.B.A. from Golden Gate University; an M.S. in Education from the University of Southern California; and a Masters in Public Policy from the University of California at Berkeley.
When you see a Safari Enabled icon on the cover of your favorite technology book, that means the book is available online through the OReilly Network Safari Bookshelf.
Safari offers a solution thats better than e-books. Its a virtual library that lets you easily search thousands of top tech books, cut and paste code samples, download chapters, and find quick answers when you need the most accurate, current information. Try it at http://safari.oreilly.com.
The text in this booklet is largely adapted from the book Wikipedia: The Missing Manual , by John Broughton. Some text has been added by the author, with editorial guidance and other assistance from Keith McNamara, Alisson Walsh, and Nan Barber. Nellie McKesson was the production editor, and illustrations were done by Rob Romano. Keith Fahlgren provided DocBook support.
In mid-2007, a major survey found that more than a third of Americans regularly consulted Wikipedia. Since then, that percentage has probably grown, just as Wikipedia hasat the rate of several thousand new articles every day, plus the lengthening of articles via more than 100 edits every minute.
In January 2008, OReilly published Wikipedia: The Missing Manual . That book is a how-to manual for folks who want to edit Wikipedia articles and become more active in the Wikipedia community. This pocket guide is mostly about understanding and making the most of Wikipedia as a reader . But it also includes most of the first chapter of Wikipedia: The Missing Manual Editing Your First Articlefor when youre ready to consider the next step: contributing to the largest collective writing project in the world.
So, why do people contribute to Wikipedia? The question is relevant to you as a reader, because a writers motivation offers some clues about the writings trustworthiness. The reasons vary from person to person, and usually are a mixture of factors, but here are a couple:
As a way of helping other people understand the worldand perhaps changing the world as a result.
To give back to the community that provides a valuable resource by contributing to it.
Clear, factual writing is challenging, interesting, and often fun. Working jointly with others on improving articles in Wikipedia is intrinsically rewarding.
Wikipedia is a collaboratively written encyclopedia. Its a wiki , which means that the underlying software (in this case, a system called MediaWiki ) tracks every change to every page. That change-tracking system makes it easy to remove ( revert ) inappropriate edits, and to identify repeat offenders who can be blocked from future editing.
Wikipedia is run by the not-for-profit Wikimedia Foundation ; thats why you dont see advertising on any of its pages, or on any of Wikipedias sister projects that the Foundation runs (more on those later). To date, almost all the money to run Wikipedia and its smaller sister projects has come from donations. Once a year or so, for about a month, you may see a fundraising banner instead of the standard small-print request for donations at the top of each page, but, so far, thats about as intrusive as the foundations fundraising gets.
The Foundation has only about a dozen employees, including a couple of programmers. It buys hardware, designs and implements the core software, and pays for the network bandwidth that makes Wikipedia and its sister projects possible. But it doesnt have the resources to do any of the writing for those projects. All the writing (known in the community as editing ) is done by people who get no money for their efforts, though plenty of personal satisfaction.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit. You dont have to register to edit articles. If you do register, you dont even have to provide an email address (although you should, in case you forget your password). Because of the variety and number of editors, Wikipedia is immense in scope2.3 million articles as of April 2008, and over 1 billion words (more than 25 times as many as the next largest English-language encyclopedia, the Encyclopaedia Britannica). By the same token, Wikipedia isand will continue to bea work in progress.
The best answer may be Compared to what? Wikipedia wouldnt be one of the worlds top 10 most visited Web sites (that includes all 250-plus language versions, not just the English Wikipedia) if readers didnt find it better than available alternatives. To be sure, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia under construction. As the general disclaimer (see the Disclaimers link at the bottom of every page) says, WIKIPEDIA MAKES NO GUARANTEE OF VALIDITY. Please be advised that nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by people with the expertise required to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information.
On the other hand, Wikipedia has been reviewed by a number of outside experts, most famously in an article published in Nature in December 2005. In that article, a group of experts compared 42 articles in Wikipedia to the corresponding articles in Encyclopaedia Britannica. Their conclusion: The number of errors in a typical Wikipedia science article is not substantially more than in Encyclopaedia Britannica. (The actual count was 162 errors vs. 123.) That comparison is now more than 2 years old, and editors have continued to improve those 42 articles as well as all the others that were in the encyclopedia back then. (For a full list of outside reviews of Wikipedia, see the Wikipedia page
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
Similar books «Wikipedia Readers Guide: The Missing Manual»
Look at similar books to Wikipedia Readers Guide: The Missing Manual. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.
Discussion, reviews of the book Wikipedia Readers Guide: The Missing Manual and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.