• Complain

Jenny van Hooff - Modern Couples?: Continuity and Change in Heterosexual Relationships

Here you can read online Jenny van Hooff - Modern Couples?: Continuity and Change in Heterosexual Relationships full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2016, publisher: Routledge, genre: Home and family. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Modern Couples?: Continuity and Change in Heterosexual Relationships
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Routledge
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2016
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Modern Couples?: Continuity and Change in Heterosexual Relationships: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Modern Couples?: Continuity and Change in Heterosexual Relationships" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Have heterosexual relationships become more intimate and equal over the past forty years? Simply put, this is the central question underpinning this book. Within the context of late modern social processes, including most notably individualization and detraditionalization, authors such as Giddens, Beck and Beck-Gernsheim, and Bauman have come to focus on a posited transformation of personal relationships. This has culminated in a sociological debate over the nature of contemporary relationships, with proponents of change celebrating the emergence of an intimacy based on personal satisfaction rather than traditional obligations. Detractors reject this interpretation and instead lament what they consider to be the destruction of commitment and the demoralisation of personal relationships by the rise of individualism and consumerism. While these two entrenched positions have dominated the debate, a third, marginalised perspective has emerged, which questions the extent to which contemporary relationships have become detraditionalized, and emphasises evidence of continuing gender inequalities. This book is essentially a qualitative empirical investigation of the changes and continuities posited within the debate, which evaluates existing work and details the findings of van Hooffs research into the relationships of two generations of heterosexual couples. It provides the reader with a grounded interpretation of the evidence, questioning to what extent lived reality has matched the rhetoric within contemporary relationships.

Jenny van Hooff: author's other books


Who wrote Modern Couples?: Continuity and Change in Heterosexual Relationships? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Modern Couples?: Continuity and Change in Heterosexual Relationships — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Modern Couples?: Continuity and Change in Heterosexual Relationships" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
MODERN COUPLES?
For my parents
Modern Couples?
Continuity and Change in Heterosexual Relationships
JENNY VAN HOOFF
Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
First published 2013 by Ashgate Publishing Published 2016 by Routledge 2 Park - photo 1
First published 2013 by Ashgate Publishing
Published 2016 by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
Copyright Jenny van Hooff 2013
Jenny van Hooff has asserted her moral right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the author of this work.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Notices:
Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Hooff, Jenny van.
Modern couples? : continuity and change in heterosexual relationships.
1. Man-woman relationships. 2. Couples. 3. Heterosexuals--Attitudes.
I. Title
306.84108662-dc23
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
van Hooff, Jenny.
Modern couples? : continuity and change in heterosexual relationships / by Jenny Van Hooff.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-4094-3913-4 (hardback)
1. Couples. 2. Man-woman relationships. 3. Intimacy (Psychology) I. Title.
HQ801.V279 2012
306.7--dc23
2012030856
ISBN 9781409439134 (hbk)
Contents
Acknowledgements
There are a number of people without whom this book would not have been possible. In particular I am indebted to Penny Tinkler, David Morgan, Jennifer Mason, Lynn Jamieson and colleagues at MMU and LJMU for their encouragement and support. I should also acknowledge the ESRC for funding the research presented here. For their time and willingness to discuss their personal lives with me I am grateful to all of the couples who took part in this study. Finally thanks should go to friends and family for their continuing faith and interest, and most of all to Andrew for just about everything.
Chapter 1
Locating the Couple in Sociological Theory
Intimate relationships, taking the form of family, kin, sexual and couple relationships, along with other associations including friendship, lie at the centre of contemporary sociological debate. Analysis has shifted from rigid conceptualizations of the family as an institution towards the more nuanced category of personal life (Smart, 2007), with an increasing focus on the role that networks of various intimates play in our personal lives (Jamieson et al., 2006). Yet in popular understanding and social reality the couple is often treated as the centre of our intimate and erotic lives (Jamieson, 1998). This book is essentially a qualitative investigation of the expectations and experiences of partners within co-resident heterosexual relationships, which explores the enduring appeal of this type of partnership.
Recent thought about intimacy revolves around the theme of social change, with discussion focusing on the impact of wider societal change on personal relationships. The related processes of individualization, detraditionalization and increased self-reflexivity are generally accepted as the context that has enabled the posited developments in relationships. While the individualization thesis was not at first primarily concerned with intimacy, it has become a core metaphor through which sociological analysis of family life is now pursued (Smart and Shipman, 2004). Within this debate three dominant perspectives have emerged, towards which most of the literature corresponds. These approaches stress either the potential offered by the democratization of intimate relationships, the resulting breakdown of family relationships, or the continuation of traditional inequalities and power structures. The research presented here is essentially an empirical investigation of this ongoing debate, with a particular focus on the changing nature of couple relationships. Before going on to summarize the methodological approach taken, the research is contextualized within wider sociological discussions of intimate relationships.
The Democratization Thesis
The reshaping of personal relationships since the 1960s has led to claims that our intimate lives are the premier site of detraditionalization within late modernity (Gross, 2005: 286). Anthony Giddens is one of the more influential theorists to have written about intimate relationships within the context of a late modern social setting. For this reason the issues raised by his work, in particular the claims made in The Transformation of Intimacy (1992) form a major focus of this book. Giddens (1991, 1992) posits the emergence of confluent love and the pure relationship as reflections of a wider social shift towards new forms of self-identity. As the concern here is with the contemporary forms of the late modern heterosexual pair relationship and the changes it has undergone both as an ideology and a social reality in the past few decades, the rhetoric of the pure relationship is particularly relevant in informing my approach.
For Giddens, the emergence of the pure relationship is of key importance for the transformation of intimacy, as it is prototypical of the new spheres of personal life (Giddens, 1991: 6). The pure relationship is defined as radically different from traditional forms of personal relationships, as it is internally referential and therefore exists solely for whatever rewards that relationship as such can deliver (Giddens, 1991: 6). Giddens (1992) traces the development of the pure relationship in order to place it in an historical context. He begins with the emergence of romantic love, an ideal that was widely diffused in the nineteenth century, when marriage began to lose the economic and kinship ties which were so crucial in premodern arrangements. Pre-industrial marriage was designed to ensure a familys survival as an economic unit and as such was rarely motivated by love (Stone, 1979). With the ensuing separation of the private and public spheres of life, love became celebrated as the main reason for marriage. Middle class couples also began to limit the amount of children they had, and this placed a finger on the trigger so far as sexuality was concerned (Giddens, 1992: 26).
The emphasis placed on love within marriage began a reordering of emotional life and, according to Giddens, introduced the idea of narrative into an individuals life, which refers to the stories by which self-identity is understood both by the individual concerned and others (Giddens, 1992: 3940). Paradoxically, romantic love was essentially feminized love (Giddens, 1992: 43), although it ensured female subordination by tying women to the home. The extent to which marriage for love came about as a result of industrialization and capitalism, as Giddens maintains, have been questioned, as within Europe free choice of marriage partner predates these developments (Jackson, 1993: 208).
While elements of romantic love ensured the creation of the pure relationship, many of its influences have been destroyed by the emergence of confluent love. The consequences of romantic love for women are incompatible with the egalitarian partnership at the heart of the pure relationship. Confluent love, the successor to romantic love, is an active, contingent love (Giddens, 1992: 61), which presumes equality in emotional give and take (Giddens, 1991: 62). Confluent love differs from romantic love on several points. Firstly, it does not value the forever and one and only (Giddens, 1992: 61) qualities of romantic love, as the finding of a special relationship becomes more important than pledging oneself to a special person. Confluent love also relies on reciprocal sexual pleasure as a core element of a relationship, and in doing so presumes the disappearance of the respectable woman. Furthermore, confluent love is not exclusive to heterosexual relationships, as it is not based on gender difference in the way that romantic love is and it is also not necessarily monogamous. Mutual disclosure is central to confluent love and represents the antithesis of the ideal of mystery, which was so crucial to romantic love. Fragments of romantic love remain, however it is confluent love that characterizes a pure relationship.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Modern Couples?: Continuity and Change in Heterosexual Relationships»

Look at similar books to Modern Couples?: Continuity and Change in Heterosexual Relationships. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Modern Couples?: Continuity and Change in Heterosexual Relationships»

Discussion, reviews of the book Modern Couples?: Continuity and Change in Heterosexual Relationships and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.