• Complain

Peter Watson - Fallout: Conspiracy, Cover-Up, and the Deceitful Case for the Atom Bomb

Here you can read online Peter Watson - Fallout: Conspiracy, Cover-Up, and the Deceitful Case for the Atom Bomb full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2018, publisher: PublicAffairs, genre: Non-fiction. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Fallout: Conspiracy, Cover-Up, and the Deceitful Case for the Atom Bomb
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    PublicAffairs
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2018
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Fallout: Conspiracy, Cover-Up, and the Deceitful Case for the Atom Bomb: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Fallout: Conspiracy, Cover-Up, and the Deceitful Case for the Atom Bomb" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The justification for the atomic bomb was simple: it would defeat Hitler and end the Second World War faster, saving lives. The reality was different.
Falloutdismantles the conventional story of why the atom bomb was built. Peter Watson has found new documents showing that long before the Allied bomb was operational, it was clear that Germany had no atomic weapons of its own and was not likely to. The British knew this, but didnt share their knowledge with the Americans, who in turn deceived the British about the extent to which the Soviets had penetrated their plans to build and deploy the bomb.
The dark secret was that the bomb was dropped not to decisively end the war in the Pacific but to warn off Stalins Russia, still in principle a military ally of the US and Britain. It did not bring a hot war to an abrupt end; instead it set up the terms for a Cold one to begin.
Moreover, none of the scientists recruited to build the bomb had any idea that the purpose of the bomb had been secretly changed and that Russian deterrence was its new objective.
Falloutvividly reveals the story of the unnecessary building of the atomic bomb, the most destructive weapon in the world, and the long-term consequences that are still playing out to this day.

Peter Watson: author's other books


Who wrote Fallout: Conspiracy, Cover-Up, and the Deceitful Case for the Atom Bomb? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Fallout: Conspiracy, Cover-Up, and the Deceitful Case for the Atom Bomb — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Fallout: Conspiracy, Cover-Up, and the Deceitful Case for the Atom Bomb" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

I realized then [1941] that a bomb was not only possible it was inevitable.

Sir James Chadwick, the most senior British scientist in the Manhattan Project, speaking to an interviewer shortly before his death in 1974

The Allies won [the Second World War] because our German scientists were better than their German scientists.

Sir Ian Jacob, military secretary to Winston Churchill

Atomic weapons can hardly be used without spelling the end of the world.

Joseph Stalin

When you see something that is technically sweet, you go ahead and do it and you argue about it only after you have had your technical success. That is the way it was with the atomic bomb.

J. Robert Oppenheimer, scientific director of Los Alamos

Dont bother me with your conscientious scruples. After all, the things superb physics.

Enrico Fermi, creator of the first sustainable nuclear chain reaction

The first atomic bomb was an unnecessary experiment... [the scientists] had this toy and they wanted to try it out, so they dropped it.

Admiral William Bull Halsey, commander of the Third Fleet

Chadwicks discovery of the neutron marked the unintentional first step towards mans loss of innocence in the field of nuclear energy.

Andrew Brown, James Chadwicks biographer

When the righteous sin, they add the force of their virtue to all the evil that they do.

Lewis Mumford, paraphrasing Ezekiel 18:24

Fallout 1 Radioactive particles that are carried into the atmosphere after a - photo 1
Fallout 1 Radioactive particles that are carried into the atmosphere after a - photo 2

Fallout

1. Radioactive particles that are carried into the atmosphere after a nuclear explosion and gradually fall back as dust or in precipitation.

2. The adverse results of a situation or action.

Preface
Cover-Up: When the Righteous Sin

Albert Einsteins famous realisation that E=mc2 , that matter and energy are essentially different aspects of the same phenomenon, may be the most rapidly consequential idea in human history. He first published his theory of nuclear energy in May 1905, refining it with the help of others until 1917 in the middle of the First World War. Twenty-eight years later a single generation in human terms on 6 August 1945, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were each destroyed by an atomic bomb, bringing an end to the Second World War.

History shows that while ideas can be consequential the Renaissance, the Reformation, the Scientific and Romantic revolutions were real enough it is not always so easy to identify the exact role they played. What were the intellectual origins of the French Revolution? Why did a Marxist revolution occur in Russia when Marx himself expected it to happen in England? Why did modernism emerge in France first if, indeed, it did?

But with atomic energy nuclear energy the chronology is known with an exactitude that is rare in the history of ideas. Beginning in 1898 with the identification of the electron, soon followed by the discovery of the structure of the atom in 1907, and then the realisation of the existence and importance of the neutron in 1932, giving rise to the possibility of a chain reaction, the pieces of this jigsaw were put together in a remarkably swift period, the heroic age of physics as Ernest Rutherford, the director of the Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge, called it.

But the 1920s and 1930s were notable for something else, no less consequential and no less dramatic: the rise of Nazism in Germany and Fascism in Italy.

From the discovery of the neutron in the year before Hitler came to power in Berlin, some scientists were aware of the theoretical possibility that the massive energy wrapped up in the nucleus of the atom could be unlocked, but hoped against hope that it would never prove practical. And then, over Christmas/New Year 1938/9, on the very eve of war, four scientists from Germany confirmed that they had split fissioned the nucleus of uranium, the heaviest element in the periodic table and the most unstable. The possibility of nuclear weapons came a frightening step nearer.

One German scientist, Werner Heisenberg, arguably the most brilliant of all, who had won the Nobel Prize in 1932, aged thirty-one, was much later to say that had a handful of physicists got together in 1939 and refused to do any more work on nuclear weapons, there was nothing the politicians could have done, and the whole nuclear arms

Instead, that year a very small number of highly trained individuals suddenly found themselves in possession of knowledge and skills that could, at least in theory, decide the outcome of war, should it come to pass, which seemed increasingly likely. What could be more dramatic than that an idea so powerful that it could determine the outcome of a world war? Einstein himself was distraught.

Picture 3

Six years later Einsteins remarkable insight was fully realised. On Monday 16 July 1945 at 5.29 a.m., the first test of an atomic bomb was successfully carried out at the so-called Trinity site in the Alamogordo desert in New Mexico. Though he was told the noise had been heard in three states, Leslie Groves, the general in charge of the project, insisted the test be kept secret. Can you give us an easy job, general, an aide remarked, like hiding the Mississippi River? The very next day, President Harry Truman sat down for his first and only face-to-face meeting with the Soviet premier Joseph Stalin in a

Three weeks later, on 6 August, also a Monday, Einsteins idea was again deployed when Hiroshima was bombed. Two days after that, on 8 August, the Soviet Union declared war on Japan. The very next morning, the Red Armys tanks rolled across the Manchurian border.

These events were hardly coincidences. In recent years, the view has become established among historians at least if not yet the general public that the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not needed to end the Second World War but had another purpose.

In some ways it is surprising that this view is not more widespread. One early distinguished sceptic about the bombs use was General Dwight D. Eisenhower, supreme commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force, who directed Allied operations in Europe against Hitler, and was later president of the United States. At the height of the Cold War, and soon after his famous farewell address as president, in which he drew attention to the risks posed by the military-industrial complex, he recalled the moment when the secretary of war, Henry Stimson, told him that the atomic bomb was to be used against Japanese cities:

Admiral William Bull Halseys Third Fleet was meeting almost no resistance as it bombarded Japanese coastal installations, and Admiral Wagner, in charge of air search-and-patrol, found that in all the millions of square miles on the East Asian seas and coasts there was literally not a single target worth the powder to blow it up. Halsey later, echoing Eisenhower, said: The first atomic bomb was an unnecessary experiment... It was a mistake to ever drop it... [the scientists] had this toy and they wanted to try it out, so they dropped it... It killed a lot of Japs, but the Japs had put out a lot of peace

Perhaps even more telling, less than a year after the bombings an extensive official study by the US Strategic Bombing Survey published its conclusion that Japan would likely have surrendered in 1945 without atomic bombing, without a Soviet declaration of war,

Leo Szilard, a Hungarian Jewish migr who had escaped the Third Reich by the skin of his teeth and had later been the first to conceive the idea of the nuclear chain reaction, had met with James F. Byrnes, President Trumans personal representative on atomic matters and subsequently secretary of state, at his home in Spartanburg, South Carolina in May 1945. In a memoir, Szilard wrote:

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Fallout: Conspiracy, Cover-Up, and the Deceitful Case for the Atom Bomb»

Look at similar books to Fallout: Conspiracy, Cover-Up, and the Deceitful Case for the Atom Bomb. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Fallout: Conspiracy, Cover-Up, and the Deceitful Case for the Atom Bomb»

Discussion, reviews of the book Fallout: Conspiracy, Cover-Up, and the Deceitful Case for the Atom Bomb and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.