• Complain

Stephen Kotkin - Stalin: Volume I: Paradoxes of Power, 1878–1928

Here you can read online Stephen Kotkin - Stalin: Volume I: Paradoxes of Power, 1878–1928 full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2014, publisher: Penguin Press HC, genre: Non-fiction. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Stephen Kotkin Stalin: Volume I: Paradoxes of Power, 1878–1928
  • Book:
    Stalin: Volume I: Paradoxes of Power, 1878–1928
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Penguin Press HC
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2014
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Stalin: Volume I: Paradoxes of Power, 1878–1928: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Stalin: Volume I: Paradoxes of Power, 1878–1928" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

A magnificent new biography that revolutionizes our understanding of Stalin and his world
It has the quality of myth: a poor cobblers son, a seminarian from an oppressed outer province of the Russian empire, reinvents himself as a top leader in a band of revolutionary zealots. When the band seizes control of the country in the aftermath of total world war, the former seminarian ruthlessly dominates the new regime until he stands as absolute ruler of a vast and terrible state apparatus, with dominion over Eurasia. While still building his power base within the Bolshevik dictatorship, he embarks upon the greatest gamble of his political life and the largest program of social reengineering ever attempted: the collectivization of all agriculture and industry across one sixth of the earth. Millions will die, and many more millions will suffer, but the man will push through to the end against all resistance and doubts.
Where did such power come from? In Stalin, Stephen Kotkin offers a biography that, at long last, is equal to this shrewd, sociopathic, charismatic dictator in all his dimensions. The character of Stalin emerges as both astute and blinkered, cynical and true believing, people oriented and vicious, canny enough to see through people but prone to nonsensical beliefs. We see a man inclined to despotism who could be utterly charming, a pragmatic ideologue, a leader who obsessed over slights yet was a precocious geostrategic thinkerunique among Bolsheviksand yet who made egregious strategic blunders. Through it all, we see Stalins unflinching persistence, his sheer force of willperhaps the ultimate key to understanding his indelible mark on history.
Stalin gives an intimate view of the Bolshevik regimes inner geography of power, bringing to the fore fresh materials from Soviet military intelligence and the secret police. Kotkin rejects the inherited wisdom about Stalins psychological makeup, showing us instead how Stalins near paranoia was fundamentally political, and closely tracks the Bolshevik revolutions structural paranoia, the predicament of a Communist regime in an overwhelmingly capitalist world, surrounded and penetrated by enemies. At the same time, Kotkin demonstrates the impossibility of understanding Stalins momentous decisions outside of the context of the tragic history of imperial Russia.
The product of a decade of intrepid research, Stalin is a landmark achievement, a work that recasts the way we think about the Soviet Union, revolution, dictatorship, the twentieth century, and indeed the art of history itself.

Stephen Kotkin: author's other books


Who wrote Stalin: Volume I: Paradoxes of Power, 1878–1928? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Stalin: Volume I: Paradoxes of Power, 1878–1928 — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Stalin: Volume I: Paradoxes of Power, 1878–1928" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

A LSO BY S TEPHEN K OTKIN

Armageddon Averted: The Soviet Collapse, 19702000

Magnetic Mountain: Stalinism as a Civilization

Steeltown, USSR: Soviet Society in the Gorbachev Era

Uncivil Society: 1989 and the Implosion of the Communist Establishment

CHAPTER 2
LADOS DISCIPLE

Others live off our labor; they drink our blood; our oppression quenches their thirst with the tears of our wives, children, and kin.

Leaflets, in Georgian and Armenian, distributed by Iosif Jughashvili, 1902

T IFLIS EXUDED A HAU NTING , magical beauty. Founded in a gorge in the fifth century, the residence of Georgian kings from the sixth, Tiflisits Persian name, also employed in Russianwas centuries older than ancient Kiev, let alone upstart Moscow or St. Petersburg. In Georgian the city was called Tblisi (warm place), perhaps for its fabled hot springs. (I must not omit to mention, enthused one nineteenth-century visitor, that the baths of the city cannot be surpassed even by those of Constantinople.) Still, the Georgiansno more than a quarter of the urban populationwere to an extent upstaged in their own capital.

The urban distribution of power was glaring. On the wide tree-lined Golovin Prospect, named for a Russian general, the shops carried signs in French, German, Persian, and Armenian as well as Russian. Wares on offer included fashions from Paris and silks from Bukhara, useful for marking status, as well as carpets from nearby Iran (Tabriz), which helped distinguish interior spaces. By contrast, over at the citys labyrinthine Armenian and Persian bazaars, underneath the ruins of a Persian fortress, everyone washes, shaves, gets a haircut, dresses and undresses as if at home in their bedroom, explained a Russian-language guide to the warrens of silversmiths and cooking stalls serving kebabs and inexpensive wines.

It was in this modernizing urban milieu that Jughashviliwho was back in Tiflis as of 1894entered the seminary and came of age, becoming not a priest but a Marxist and revolutionary. Lado was the fifth of six children born to a priest from a village just outside Gori. Three years Jughashvilis senior at the Gori church school and then at the Tiflis Theological Seminary, Lado acquired tremendous authority among the seminarians. Under Lados influence, the young Jughashvili, already an energetic autodidact, found a lifelong calling in being an agitator and a teacher, helping the dark masses see the light about social injustice and a purported all-purpose remedy.

GEORGIAN CULTURAL NATIONALIST

Compared with small-town Gori, the Caucasus capital offered a grand drama of incipient modernity, but Iosif Jughashvili did not see much of the city, at least not initially. His immediate world, the theological seminary, was dubbed the Stone Sacka four-story bastion of neoclassical faade. If the main classical gymnasium stood at the pinnacle of the local educational hierarchy, the seminarymore accessible to poor youthwas not far behind. The building, at the southern end of Golovin Prospect on Yerevan Square, had been purchased by the Orthodox Church from a sugar magnate (Constantine Zubalashvili) to serve as the new home of the seminary in 1873. For the hundreds of students who lived on the top floor in an open-style dormitory, their daily regime generally lasted from 7:00 a.m. until 10:00 p.m. Ringing bells summoned them to morning prayers, followed by tea (breakfast), classes until 2:00 p.m., a midday main meal at 3:00, then a mere hour or so outside the walls, roll call at 5:00, evening prayers, tea (a light supper) at 8:00, homework, and lights out. Day and night we were worked within barrack walls and felt like prisoners, recalled another Gori Soso, Ioseb Iremashvili, who like the young Stalin was attending the seminary by way of the Gori church school. Occasional leaves were granted to return to ones native village or town, but otherwise Sundays alone afforded some free timebut only after Orthodox Church services, which meant standing for three to four hours on stone tiles. Trips to the theater and other blasphemies were proscribed. Some seminarians, however, dared to escape to town after nightly roll call, despite the random night dormitory checks to ferret out reading of illicit materials by candlelight or onanism.

The regimentation for the teenage seminarians accustomed to indulgent families and the free play of the streets had to be frustrating, but the seminary also offered endless opportunity for passionate discussions with fellow students about the meaning of existence and their own futures, as well as the discovery of books and learning. Emphasis fell on sacred texts, of course, and on Church Slavonic and Russian imperial history. Ioseb Soso Jughashvili, now known in Russified form as Iosif, was in his element, and he performed well. He became the school choirs lead tenor, a high-profile achievement, given how much time the boys spent in church and preparing for church. He also developed into a voracious reader who started keeping a notebook of thoughts and ideas. In the classroom, he earned mostly grades of 4 (B), while achieving 5s (As) in ecclesiastical singing, and earned 5 rubles for occasional singing in the Opera House. In the beginning years his only 3s (Cs) came in final composition and Greek. He received the top mark (5) in conduct. As a freshman, Jughashvili placed eighth in a group of twenty-nine, and as a sophomore he rose to fifth. But in his third year, 1896-97, his rank slipped to sixteenth (of twenty-four), and by the fifth year he stood twentieth (of twenty-three), having failed scripture. But the main cause of his declining interest and performance stemmed from a culture clash brought on by modernizing forces and political reactions.

In 1879, the year after Jughashvili had been born, two Georgian noblemen writers, Prince Ilya Chavchavadze (b. 1837) and Prince Akaki Tsereteli (b. 1840), had founded the Society for the Spread of Literacy Among Georgians. Georgians comprised many different groupsKakhetis, Kartlians, Imeretians, Mingrelianswith a shared language, and Chavchavadze and Tsereteli hoped to spark an integrated Georgian cultural rebirth through schools, libraries, and bookshops. Their conservative populist cultural program intended no disloyalty to the empire.

Expulsions for unreliability became commonplace, defeating the educational purpose of the seminary. In response to the heavy-handedness, Tiflis seminariansmany of them the sons of Orthodox priestshad begun (in the 1870s) to produce illegal newsletters and form secret discussion circles. In 1884, a member of one such Tiflis seminary circle, Silibistro Silva Jibladze (who had led a revolt back in his junior seminary), struck the Russian rector in the face for denigrating Georgian as dogspeak. As the boys well knew, the kingdom of Georgia had converted to the Christian faith half a millennium before the Russians did, and more than a century before the Romans. Jibladze was sentenced to three years in a punishment battalion. Then, in 1886, to empirewide notoriety, a different expelled student assassinated the Tiflis seminary rector using a traditional Caucasus dagger (kinjal). The seminary reopened in fall 1894 with two first-year classes, the 1893 and the 1894 admissions, the latter being Iosif Jughashvilis.

When the future Stalin started at the seminary, the harsh disciplinary mechanisms remained, but in a concession, courses in Georgian literature and history were reinstituted. In summer 1895, after his first year, Jughashvili, then sixteen and a half, took his own Georgian-language verses in person to the publishing nobleman Ilya Chavchavadze, without seminary permission. The editor of Chavchavadzes newspaper Iveria (a term for Eastern Georgia) published five of Jughashvilis poems, under the widely used Georgian nickname for Ioseb/Iosif: Soselo. Eristavis verses, the dictator would later say, were beautiful, emotional, and musical, adding that the prince was rightly called the nightingale of Georgiaa role to which Jughashvili himself might have aspired. An affectionate sixth Jughashvili poem, Old Ninika, published in 1896 in

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Stalin: Volume I: Paradoxes of Power, 1878–1928»

Look at similar books to Stalin: Volume I: Paradoxes of Power, 1878–1928. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Stalin: Volume I: Paradoxes of Power, 1878–1928»

Discussion, reviews of the book Stalin: Volume I: Paradoxes of Power, 1878–1928 and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.