• Complain

Michael McNally - Ramillies 1706: Marlborough’s tactical masterpiece

Here you can read online Michael McNally - Ramillies 1706: Marlborough’s tactical masterpiece full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2014, publisher: Osprey Publishing, genre: Non-fiction. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Michael McNally Ramillies 1706: Marlborough’s tactical masterpiece
  • Book:
    Ramillies 1706: Marlborough’s tactical masterpiece
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Osprey Publishing
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2014
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Ramillies 1706: Marlborough’s tactical masterpiece: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Ramillies 1706: Marlborough’s tactical masterpiece" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Ramillies 1706 details one of the most important clashes in the War of the Spanish Succession, a battle that secure the Duke of Marlboroughs place in history and helped determine the future of Europe.

In 1706, as the War of Spanish Succession dragged on, Frances Louis XIV was eager for peace, but he wanted it on his terms. Therefore, rather than standing on the defensive, French armies on all fronts swung over to the offensive. Marlborough decided to counter by launching a pre-emptive strike. The two sides met at Ramillies on May 23rd.
Enjoying an almost parity in numbers the French took up position along a river line, anchoring each of their flanks on a marshy area, thereby surrendering the initiative to Marlborough, who proceeded to probe against both flanks. Using a series of deceptions and feints, Marlborough took advantage of a concealed re-entrant to reinforce his center which, at that time, was cannonading the French positions. Unaware of this, the French general Villeroi drastically weakened his center in order to reinforce the threatened sector. Seizing the opportunity, Marlborough launched an overwhelming attack on his own terms.
In the wake of two massive cavalry mles, during one of which Marlborough was unhorsed and almost killed, the allied troops shattered the French, inflicting over 20,000 casualties--almost one third of the Franco-Hispano-Bavarian army--at a cost of less than 4,000 men, thus paving the way for allied forces to overturn the French position in Flanders, and in the process capturing several strategically important towns and cities including Brussels, Bruges, Louvain and Antwerp.
In short, whilst Blenheim in 1704 had been a masterpiece of strategic maneuver that had wrong footed the Franco-Bavarian armies and removed the threat to Vienna, it was Marlboroughs tactical intuition on the field of Ramillies that had led to perhaps his finest battlefield performance and paved the way for a campaign that would see much of Flanders come under Allied control.

Michael McNally: author's other books


Who wrote Ramillies 1706: Marlborough’s tactical masterpiece? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Ramillies 1706: Marlborough’s tactical masterpiece — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Ramillies 1706: Marlborough’s tactical masterpiece" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
CAMPAIGN 275
RAMILLIES 1706
Marlboroughs tactical masterpiece
MICHAEL MCNALLY ILLUSTRATED BY SEN BRGIN Series editor Marcus Cowper CONTENTS - photo 1
MICHAEL MCNALLYILLUSTRATED BY SEN BRGIN
Series editor Marcus Cowper
CONTENTS

THE STRATEGIC SITUATION On the morning of 13 August 1704 an Allied army of - photo 2

THE STRATEGIC SITUATION On the morning of 13 August 1704 an Allied army of - photo 3
THE STRATEGIC SITUATION

On the morning of 13 August 1704, an Allied army of around 52,000 men under John Churchill, Duke of Marlborough, met a slightly larger Franco-Bavarian force led by Camille, Duc dHostun more commonly referred to by his secondary title as the Comte de Tallard near the Bavarian town of Hchstdt. The previous year, a French army under Marshal Villars had crushed an Imperial army on this same ground and now, Tallard found himself unexpectedly in a position where he was unable to refuse battle, the result being a disaster for French arms that saw him a prisoner of war and his army in tatters. In the English-speaking world, the battle was named after Blindheim, the small village which saw the fiercest fighting and where the largest concentration of French troops was encircled and captured, and by its anglicized form Blenheim it is the name most synonymous with Marlboroughs career.

In his recent account of the battle, the historian Charles Spencer refers to Blenheim as having stopped the French conquest of Europe, and yet whilst the 1704 campaign shows Marlborough at his best, not only as the possessor of a strategic sense that places him head and shoulders above his contemporaries but also as a battlefield commander of the highest ability, the battle did not stop the French military colossus dead in its tracks nor did it as has also been argued shatter the myth of French invincibility. This myth took a severe drubbing during the Italian campaign of 1701 when Prince Eugne of Savoy first overwhelmed a French force at Carpi in July and comprehensibly defeated a numerically superior Franco-Savoyard army under Villeroi at Chiari in September, before capturing this self-same officer at Cremona five months later.

Throughout his final illness King Carlos II of Spain was pressed by the - photo 4

Throughout his final illness, King Carlos II of Spain was pressed by the various contending factions to alter his will in favour of their nominees. Under pressure from the Church, he bequeathed his kingdom to Philippe of Anjou, grandson of King Louis XIV, in the mistaken belief that all parties would accept his decision and the Spanish monarchy would remain intact. (Authors collection)

The main effect of Blenheim was to remove, once and for all, the Bourbon threat to Vienna with the inherent possibility that, by thus knocking Austria-Hungary out of the war, France could militarily enforce the last will and testament of King Carlos II of Spain.

The king was a product of generations of extreme inbreeding, which had resulted in his developing a series of severe mental and physical disabilities. Both of his marriages had remained childless and, in an attempt to stave off the horrors of a disputed succession, his advisers needed to find an acceptable compromise heir outside the direct line of succession, as the two principal candidates his cousins, King Louis XIV of France and the Holy Roman Emperor, Leopold were the focal points of the BourbonHabsburg enmity that had divided Europe for the better part of the 17th century.

Naturally neither party could countenance the enrichment of his rival to his own detriment and, anxious to avoid another war, Louis began to open secret negotiations with the Maritime powers, England and the United Dutch Provinces, Austrias most prominent allies and two nations who already had their eyes on the expansion of their overseas trade at Spains expense. After lengthy negotiation, it was agreed that the principal heir would be neither Louis nor Leopold, but Leopolds six-year-old grandson, Josef Ferdinand of Bavaria, whose claim was drawn through Maria-Antonia, the Emperors only child with his late wife, Margaret Theresa, an elder sister of Carlos II, through his fathers second marriage.

To sweeten the pill, it was agreed that the Bavarian prince would receive metropolitan Spain and the overseas colonies whilst the contentious parts of the European inheritance would be ceded to the nominees of Vienna and Versailles the Spanish Netherlands would go to the Archduke Charles (Leopolds younger son through his second marriage) whilst the Italian territories with the exclusion of the strategically important Duchy of Milan would go to Louiss eldest son, and namesake, the Dauphin. Milan would be granted to the Duke of Lorraine, who would in turn cede his possessions of Lorraine and Bar to the Dauphin. On paper the treaty guaranteed European peace, but foundered jointly on Austrian demands that Milan should also go to the Archduke and the fact that Carlos would not countenance the dismemberment of the Spanish monarchy; he would instead acknowledge Josef Ferdinand as Prince of the Asturias, his sole heir.

Spain was torn between pro-French and pro-Austrian factions but nonetheless negotiations between France and the Maritime Powers continued, with an agreement being reached that would see Josef Ferdinand becoming King of Spain, with the Archduke Charles receiving the Duchy of Milan and the remaining Italian territories going to the Dauphin. Again, it looked as if an agreement had been brokered but, on 3 February 1699, whilst in Brussels to receive the support of the Flemish nobility, the six-year-old prince took ill and died. The succession would now be decided between the Habsburg and Bourbon candidates and, in the final year of his life, Carlos, in an attempt to secure the integrity of the Spanish Inheritance, nominated Louiss second grandson, Philippe of Anjou, as his sole heir, with the Archduke Charles being relegated to the position of third heir after Philippes younger brother, Charles of Berry.

Still very much an evolutionary form of the more common 18th-century weapon - photo 5

Still very much an evolutionary form of the more common 18th-century weapon, this French bayonet dating from the early 1700s fits over the muzzle and is affixed to the weapon by a lug, through the socket at the base of the weapon. Unlike later developments, which place the blade to the side of the muzzle, this curved blade fits around the muzzle and is effectively a direct extension of the musket itself. (Copyright and courtesy of Royal Armouries, Leeds)

For Louis XIV, the legacy was a poisoned chalice which presented him with two options, neither of which were particularly palatable to him: he could accept the will and repudiate the treaty, thus antagonizing Austria and the Maritime Powers, or he could remain bound by it, which would cause both an unnecessary break with Spain and an inevitable break with Vienna. Reasoning that further conflict with the Habsburgs was well-nigh unavoidable and would thus certainly bring the English and the Dutch into the ranks of his enemies, the French king decided to accept the will, proclaiming his grandson to be King Philip V of Spain by announcing: His birth called him to this crown. The Spanish People have willed it and demanded it of me: it was the command of heaven, and I have granted it with joy.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Ramillies 1706: Marlborough’s tactical masterpiece»

Look at similar books to Ramillies 1706: Marlborough’s tactical masterpiece. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Ramillies 1706: Marlborough’s tactical masterpiece»

Discussion, reviews of the book Ramillies 1706: Marlborough’s tactical masterpiece and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.