Also by Andrew J. Bacevich
The Limits of Power:
The End of American Exceptionalism
The Long War:
A New History of U.S. National Security Policy
Since World War II
The New American Militarism:
How Americans Are Seduced by War
American Empire:
The Realities and Consequences
of U.S. Diplomacy
The Imperial Tense:
Prospects and Problems
of American Empire
WASHINGTON RULES
WASHINGTON RULES
AMERICAS PATH
TO PERMANENT WAR
ANDREW J. BACEVICH
METROPOLITAN BOOKS
HENRY HOLT AND COMPANY
NEW YORK
Metropolitan Books
Henry Holt and Company, LLC
Publishers since 1866
175 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10010
www.henryholt.com
Metropolitan Books and are registered trademarks of Henry Holt and Company, LLC.
Copyright 2010 by Andrew J. Bacevich
All rights reserved.
Distributed in Canada by H. B. Fenn and Company Ltd.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Bacevich, Andrew J.
Washington rules : Americas path to permanent war / Andrew J. Bacevich.1st ed.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-8050-9141-0
1. United StatesForeign relationsDecision making. 2. United StatesMilitary policyDecision making. 3. Consensus (Social sciences)United States. I. Title.
JZ1480.B335 2010
355'.033573dc22
2010006302
Henry Holt books are available for special promotions and premiums.
For details contact: Director, Special Markets.
First Edition 2010
Designed by Meryl Sussman Levavi
Printed in the United States of America
1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2
TO MY DARLING DAUGHTERS
Jennifer Maureen
Amy Elizabeth
Kathleen Therese
Suffer us not to mock ourselves with falsehood.
T. S. E LIOT, A SH W EDNESDAY (1930)
CONTENTS
WASHINGTON RULES
INTRODUCTION: SLOW LEARNER
Worldly ambition inhibits true learning. Ask me. I know. A young man in a hurry is nearly uneducable: He knows what he wants and where hes headed; when it comes to looking back or entertaining heretical thoughts, he has neither the time nor the inclination. All that counts is that he is going somewhere. Only as ambition wanes does education become a possibility.
My own education did not commence until I had reached middle age. I can fix its start date with precision: For me, education began in Berlin, on a winters evening, at the Brandenburg Gate, not long after the Berlin Wall had fallen.
As an officer in the U.S. Army I had spent considerable time in Germany. Until that moment, however, my family and I had never had occasion to visit this most famous of German cities, still littered with artifacts of a deeply repellent history. At the end of a long day of exploration, we found ourselves in what had, until just months before, been the communist East. It was late and we were hungry, but I insisted on walking the length of the Unter den Linden, from the River Spree to the gate itself. A cold rain was falling and the pavement glistened. The buildings lining the avenue, dating from the era of Prussian kings, were dark, dirty, and pitted. Few people were about. It was hardly a night for sightseeing.
For as long as I could remember, the Brandenburg Gate had been the preeminent symbol of the age and Berlin the epicenter of contemporary history. Yet by the time I made it to the once and future German capital, history was already moving on. The Cold War had abruptly ended. A divided city and a divided nation had reunited.
For Americans who had known Berlin only from a distance, the city existed primarily as a metaphor. Pick a date1933, 1942, 1945, 1948, 1961, 1989and Berlin becomes an instructive symbol of power, depravity, tragedy, defiance, endurance, or vindication. For those inclined to view the past as a chronicle of parables, the modern history of Berlin offered an abundance of material. The greatest of those parables emerged from the events of 1933 to 1945, an epic tale of evil ascendant, belatedly confronted, then heroically overthrown. A second narrative, woven from events during the intense period immediately following World War II, saw hopes for peace dashed, yielding bitter antagonism but also great resolve. The ensuing stand-offthe long twilight struggle, in John Kennedys memorable phraseformed the centerpiece of the third parable, its central theme stubborn courage in the face of looming peril. Finally came the exhilarating events of 1989, with freedom ultimately prevailing, not only in Berlin, but throughout Eastern Europe.
What exactly was I looking for at the Brandenburg Gate? Perhaps confirmation that those parables, which I had absorbed and accepted as true, were just that. Whatever I expected, what I actually found was a cluster of shabby-looking young men, not German, hawking badges, medallions, hats, bits of uniforms, and other artifacts of the mighty Red Army. It was all junk, cheaply made and shoddy. For a handful of deutsche marks, I bought a wristwatch emblazoned with the symbol of the Soviet armored corps. Within days, it ceased to work.
Huddling among the scarred columns, those peddlersalmost certainly off-duty Russian soldiers awaiting redeployment homeconstituted a subversive presence. They were loose ends of a story that was supposed to have ended neatly when the Berlin Wall came down. As we hurried off to find warmth and a meal, this disconcerting encounter stuck with me, and I began to entertain this possibility: that the truths I had accumulated over the previous twenty years as a professional soldierespecially truths about the Cold War and U.S. foreign policymight not be entirely true.
By temperament and upbringing, I had always taken comfort in orthodoxy. In a life spent subject to authority, deference had become a deeply ingrained habit. I found assurance in conventional wisdom. Now, I started, however hesitantly, to suspect that orthodoxy might be a sham. I began to appreciate that authentic truth is never simple and that any version of truth handed down from on highwhether by presidents, prime ministers, or archbishopsis inherently suspect. The powerful, I came to see, reveal truth only to the extent that it suits them. Even then, the truths to which they testify come wrapped in a nearly invisible filament of dissembling, deception, and duplicity. The exercise of power necessarily involves manipulation and is antithetical to candor.
I came to these obvious points embarrassingly late in life. Nothing is so astonishing in education, the historian Henry Adams once wrote, as the amount of ignorance it accumulates in the form of inert facts. Until that moment I had too often confused education with accumulating and cataloging facts. In Berlin, at the foot of the Brandenburg Gate, I began to realize that I had been a naf. And so, at age forty-one, I set out, in a halting and haphazard fashion, to acquire a genuine education.
Twenty years later Ive made only modest progress. This book provides an accounting of what I have learned thus far.
In October 1990, Id gotten a preliminary hint that something might be amiss in my prior education. On October 3, communist East Germanyformally the German Democratic Republic (GDR)ceased to exist and German reunification was officially secured. That very week I accompanied a group of American military officers to the city of Jena in what had been the GDR. Our purpose was self-consciously educationalto study the famous battle of Jena-Auerstdt in which Napoleon Bonaparte and his marshals had inflicted an epic defeat on Prussian forces commanded by the Duke of Brunswick. (The outcome of that 1806 battle inspired the philosopher Hegel, then residing in Jena, to declare that the end of history was at hand. The conclusion of the Cold War had only recently elicited a similarly exuberant judgment from the American scholar Francis Fukuyama.)
Next page