• Complain

James Traub - What Was Liberalism?

Here you can read online James Traub - What Was Liberalism? full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2019, publisher: Basic Books, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    What Was Liberalism?
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Basic Books
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2019
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

What Was Liberalism?: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "What Was Liberalism?" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

A sweeping history of liberalism, from its earliest origins to its imperiled present and uncertain future

Donald Trump is the first American president to regard liberal values with open contempt. He has company: the leaders of Italy, Hungary, Poland, and Turkey, among others, are also avowed illiberals. What happened? Why did liberalism lose the support it once enjoyed? In What Was Liberalism, James Traub returns to the origins of liberalism, in the aftermath of the American and French revolutions and in the works of such great thinkers as John Stuart Mill and Isaiah Berlin.

Although the first liberals were deeply skeptical of majority rule, the liberal faith adapted, coming to encompass belief in not only individual rights and free markets, but also state action to provide basic goods. By the second half of the twentieth century, liberalism had become the national creed of the most powerful country in the world. But this consensus did not last....

James Traub: author's other books


Who wrote What Was Liberalism?? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

What Was Liberalism? — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "What Was Liberalism?" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Copyright 2019 by James Traub Cover design by Ann Kirchner Cover image The - photo 1

Copyright 2019 by James Traub

Cover design by Ann Kirchner

Cover image The Liberty Tree, Boston Massachusetts (engraving), American School (19th Century) / Private Collection / Look and Learn / Bridgeman Images; Luis Moinero / Shutterstock.com

Cover copyright 2019 Hachette Book Group, Inc.

Hachette Book Group supports the right to free expression and the value of copyright. The purpose of copyright is to encourage writers and artists to produce the creative works that enrich our culture.

The scanning, uploading, and distribution of this book without permission is a theft of the authors intellectual property. If you would like permission to use material from the book (other than for review purposes), please contact permissions@hbgusa.com . Thank you for your support of the authors rights.

Basic Books

Hachette Book Group

1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10104

www.basicbooks.com

First Edition: September 2019

Published by Basic Books, an imprint of Perseus Books, LLC, a subsidiary of Hachette Book Group, Inc. The Basic Books name and logo is a trademark of the Hachette Book Group.

The Hachette Speakers Bureau provides a wide range of authors for speaking events. To find out more, go to www.hachettespeakersbureau.com or call (866) 376-6591.

The publisher is not responsible for websites (or their content) that are not owned by the publisher.

The Library of Congress has cataloged the hardcover edition as follows:

Names: Traub, James, author.

Title: What was liberalism? : the past, present and promise of a noble idea / James Traub.

Description: First edition. | New York : Basic Books, 2019. | Includes bibliographical references and index. |

Identifiers: LCCN 2019011714 (print) | LCCN 2019016345 (ebook) | ISBN 9781541616844 (ebook) | ISBN 9781541616851 (hardcover)

Subjects: LCSH: LiberalismHistory. | LibertyHistory.

Classification: LCC JC574 (ebook) | LCC JC574 .T73 2019 (print) | DDC 320.51dc23

LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2019011714

ISBNs: 978-1-541-61685-1 (hardcover), 978-1-541-61684-4 (ebook)

E3-20190819-JV-NF-ORI

John Quincy Adams: Militant Spirit

The Freedom Agenda:
Why America Should Promote Democracy
(Just Not the Way George Bush Did)

The Best Intentions:
Kofi Annan and the UN in the Era of American World Power

To my mother

W HEN I WAS BORN, IN 1954, A MERICANS USED THE WORD liberal to describe almost everything they liked about themselves. The American assumes liberalism as one of the presuppositions of life, the historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr. wrote at the time. He is, by nature, a gradualist; he sees few problems which cannot be solved by reason and debate; and he is confident that nearly all problems can be solved. Liberalism meant optimism, rationalism, pragmatism, secularism. It was not so much a political platform as a national disposition. In his 1955 book The Liberal Tradition in America, Louis Hartz, another celebrated Harvard historian, observed that America had never had a national Liberal Party because it would have been superfluous; America, he wrote, echoing Alexis de Tocqueville, had been born liberal. At the time, of course, the president, Dwight Eisenhower, was a Republican, but his election had only confirmed the liberal consensus, for the 1952 Republican platform had accepted for the first time the programs of the New Deal, including Social Security. For all their very real disagreements, the two parties professed a broad faith in free markets, a modest commitment to deploying the state to protect vulnerable citizens and promote public goods, and a bedrock respect for individual rights.

In the America of my boyhood, everything and everyone seemed to be liberal. My father voted Republicanbut liberal Republican. My mother was an actual card-carrying member of New Yorks thoroughly marginal Liberal Party. The only really bad people in our household politics were the crackpots who joined the far-right John Birch Society, founded by candy manufacturer Robert Welch. We were not allowed to eat Sugar Babies because he made them. The only time we saw what we considered the lunatic fringe advance anywhere near the middle of American society was in 1964, when the Republicans nominated for president Barry Goldwater, the Arizona senator who seemed to be prepared to fight World War III in order to defeat Communism. Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, Goldwater said. But Communism didnt threaten our liberty; extremism did. At Rosh Hashanah services at my temple in suburban New York, a few weeks before the election, the rabbi, who never spoke about politics on the High Holy Days, implored the congregants to vote for President Lyndon Johnson. They did, of course, and the rout Goldwater suffered felt like a decisive response to anti-liberalism.

In fact, the story was much more complicated than that. Goldwater joined a rabid Cold War conservatism to a tradition of anti-statist free-market liberalism that could be traced back to Adam Smith, or even to John Locke. In 1980, Ronald Reagan, once Goldwaters most effective proxy, became president. Throughout my adult life, these right-liberals, who called themselves conservatives, traded power with left-liberals, who generally called themselves progressives. When Francis Fukuyama famously argued in 1989 that history had come to an end because liberalism had defeated all its ideological rivals, he had in mind this broader, older understanding of the word. Democrats and Republicans were much further apart in 1989 than they had been in 1954, but both were recognizably heirs of the liberal tradition.

Yet that familiar left-right world now seems almost as archaic as the postwar consensus. Wenot just Americans but citizens of the Westlive in a world where liberalism, however understood, is under dire threat from illiberalism. For all the vast differences between them, George W. Bush and Barack Obama have more in common with each other than they do with Donald Trumpor with Viktor Orbn or Jarosaw Kaczyski, the autocratic populists who dominate the politics of, respectively, Hungary and Poland. Though in 2016 he sought and won the nomination of the institutional party of conservatism, the party of free markets and small government, Trump openly mocked the alleged benefits of free trade and promised to protect Social Security and Medicare. He gleefully flouted elements of the liberal consensus that conservatives in the past had only clandestinely transgressed. This plutocratic populist trafficked in fear rather than hope; luridly evoked the dangers that people of color, especially immigrants, allegedly posed to his white audience; encouraged acts of violence against protesters; invented whatever facts suited his purpose. If voters had wanted a conservative, they could have chosen one from among his seventeen rivals for the GOP nomination; yet Trump dispatched them with ease. He has ruled precisely as he campaigned. And he remains, as of this writing, the darling of his own party.

The rise of illiberalism is the greatest shock of my political life. And its precisely because I grew up in a world of consensual liberalism that Trumps election seemed to come out of the blue. I thought political life was confined to the oscillations between left and right, as, I think, did most people of my generation, and for that matter most politicians. Liberals and conservatives thought that the greatest threat to the American future was one another. They were wrong. The greatest threat is that we will normalize violence and hatred; that we will abandon science, facts, and reason itself; that we will marginalize and persecute minorities. The twentieth century shows us how very short the path is from populism to authoritarianism.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «What Was Liberalism?»

Look at similar books to What Was Liberalism?. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «What Was Liberalism?»

Discussion, reviews of the book What Was Liberalism? and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.