• Complain

Immerwahr - How to hide an empire: a history of the greater United States

Here you can read online Immerwahr - How to hide an empire: a history of the greater United States full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: United States, year: 2020, publisher: Farrar, Straus and Giroux;Picador, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    How to hide an empire: a history of the greater United States
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Farrar, Straus and Giroux;Picador
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2020
  • City:
    United States
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

How to hide an empire: a history of the greater United States: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "How to hide an empire: a history of the greater United States" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The fall and rise of Daniel Boone -- Indian Country -- Everything you always wanted to know about Guano but were afraid to ask -- Teddy Roosevelts very good day -- Empire state of mind -- Shouting the battle cry of freedom -- Outside the charmed circle -- White city -- Doctors without borders -- Fortress America -- Warfare state -- There are times when men have to die -- Kilroy was here -- Decolonizing the United States -- Nobody knows in America, Puerto Ricos in America -- Synthetica -- This is what God hath wrought -- The empire of the red octagon -- Language is a virus -- Power is sovereignty, Mister Bond -- Baselandia -- The war of points.;Many are familiar with maps that outline all fifty U.S. states. And many are also familiar with the idea that the U.S. is an empire, exercising power around the world. But what about the actual territories - the islands, atolls, and archipelagos - the country has governed and inhabited? In this book, the author tells the story of the United States outside of the United States. This book reveals forgotten episodes that cast American history in a new light. Readers travel to the Guano Islands, where prospectors collected one of the nineteenth centurys most valuable commodities, and the Philippines, site of the most destructive event on U.S. soil. In Puerto Rico, the author shows how U.S. doctors conducted grisly experiments they would never have conducted on the mainland and charts the emergence of independence fighters who would shoot up the U.S. Congress. In the years after World War II, the author notes, the United States moved away from colonialism. Instead, it put innovations in electronics, transportation, and culture to use, devising a new sort of influence that did not require the control of colonies.--adapted from publishers description.

Immerwahr: author's other books


Who wrote How to hide an empire: a history of the greater United States? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

How to hide an empire: a history of the greater United States — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "How to hide an empire: a history of the greater United States" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Contents
Guide
Pagebreaks of the print version
The author and publisher have provided this e-book to you for your personal use - photo 1
The author and publisher have provided this e-book to you for your personal use - photo 2

The author and publisher have provided this e-book to you for your personal use only. You may not make this e-book publicly available in any way. Copyright infringement is against the law. If you believe the copy of this e-book you are reading infringes on the authors copyright, please notify the publisher at: us.macmillanusa.com/piracy.

To the uncounted

The only problem is

they dont think much

about us

in America.

Alfrredo Navarro Salanga, Manila

December 7, 1941. Japanese planes appear over a naval base on Oahu. They drop aerial torpedoes, which dive underwater, wending their way toward their targets. Four strike the USS Arizona, and the massive battleship heaves in the water. Steel, timber, diesel oil, and body parts fly through the air. The flaming Arizona tilts into the ocean, its crew diving into the oil-covered waters. For a country at peace, this is a violent awakening. It is, for the United States, the start of the Second World War.

There arent many historical episodes more firmly lodged in national memory than this one, the attack on Pearl Harbor. Its one of the few events that most people can put a date to (December 7, the date which will live in infamy, as Franklin Delano Roosevelt put it). Hundreds of books have been written about itthe Library of Congress holds more than 350. And Hollywood has made movies, from the critically acclaimed From Here to Eternity (1953) starring Burt Lancaster to the critically derided Pearl Harbor (2001) starring Ben Affleck.

But what those films dont show is what happened next. Nine hours after Japan attacked the territory of Hawaii, another set of Japanese planes came into view over another U.S. territory, the Philippines. As at Pearl Harbor, they dropped their bombs, hitting several air bases, to devastating effect.

The armys official history of the war judges the Philippine bombing to have been just as disastrous as the Hawaiian one. At Pearl Harbor, the Japanese hobbled the United States Pacific fleet, sinking four battleships and damaging four others. In the Philippines, the attackers laid waste to the largest concentration of U.S. warplanes outside North Americathe foundation of the Allies Pacific air defense.

The United States lost more than planes. The attack on Pearl Harbor was just that, an attack. Japans bombers struck, retreated, and never returned. Not so in the Philippines. There, the initial air raids were followed by more raids, then by invasion and conquest. Sixteen million FilipinosU.S. nationals who saluted the Stars and Stripes and looked to FDR as their commander in chieffell under a foreign power. They had a very different war than the inhabitants of Hawaii did.

Nor did it stop there. The event familiarly known as Pearl Harbor was in fact an all-out lightning strike on U.S. and British holdings throughout the Pacific. On a single day, the Japanese attacked the U.S. territories of Hawaii, the Philippines, Guam, Midway Island, and Wake Island. They also attacked the British colonies of Malaya, Singapore, and Hong Kong, and they invaded Thailand.

It was a phenomenal success. Japan never conquered Hawaii, but within months Guam, the Philippines, Wake, Malaya, Singapore, and Hong Kong all fell under its flag. Japan even seized the westernmost tip of Alaska, which it held for more than a year.

Looking at the big picture, you start to wonder if Pearl Harborthe name of one of the few targets Japan didnt invadeis really the best shorthand for the events of that fateful day.


Pearl Harbor wasnt how people referred to the bombings, at least not at first. How to describe them, in fact, was far from clear. Should the focus be on Hawaii, the closest target to North America and the first bit of U.S. soil Japan had struck? Or should it be the Philippines, the far larger and more vulnerable territory? Or Guam, the one that surrendered nearly immediately? Or all the Pacific holdings, including the uninhabited Wake and Midway, together?

The facts of yesterday and today speak for themselves, Roosevelt said in his address to Congresshis Infamy speech. But did they? JAPS BOMB MANILA, HAWAII was the headline of a New Mexico paper; JAPANESE PLANES BOMB HONOLULU, ISLAND OF GUAM was that of one in South Carolina. Sumner Welles, FDRs undersecretary of state, described the event as an attack upon Hawaii and upon the Philippines. Eleanor Roosevelt used a similar formulation in her radio address on the night of December 7, when she spoke of Japan bombing our citizens in Hawaii and the Philippines.

That was how the first draft of FDRs speech went, too. It presented the event as a bombing in Hawaii and the Philippines. Yet Roosevelt toyed with that draft all day, adding things in pencil, crossing other bits out. At some point he deleted the prominent references to the Philippines and settled on a different description. The attack was, in his revised version, a bombing in Oahu or, later in the speech, on the Hawaiian Islands. He still mentioned the Philippines, but only as an item on a terse list of Japans other targets: Malaya, Hong Kong, Guam, the Philippines, Wake Island, and Midwaypresented in that order. That list mingled U.S. and British territories together, giving no hint as to which was which.

Roosevelts December 7 draft of the Infamy speech Squadrons had commenced - photo 3

Roosevelts December 7 draft of the Infamy speech. Squadrons had commenced bombing in Hawaii and the Philippines on the seventh line has been changed to squadrons had commenced bombing in Oahu.

Why did Roosevelt demote the Philippines? We dont know, but its not hard to guess. Roosevelt was trying to tell a clear story: Japan had attacked the United States. But he faced a problem. Were Japans targets considered the United States? Legally, yes, they were indisputably U.S. territory. But would the public see them that way? What if Roosevelts audience didnt care that Japan had attacked the Philippines or Guam? Polls taken slightly before the attack show that few in the continental United States supported a military defense of those remote territories.

Consider how similar events played out more recently. On August 7, 1998, al-Qaeda launched simultaneous attacks on U.S. embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Hundreds died (mostly Africans), and thousands were wounded. But though those embassies were outposts of the United States, there was little public sense that the country itself had been harmed. It would take another set of simultaneous attacks three years later, on New York City and Washington, D.C., to provoke an all-out war.

An embassy is different from a territory, of course. Yet a similar logic held in 1941. Roosevelt no doubt noted that the Philippines and Guam, though technically part of the United States, seemed foreign to many. Hawaii, by contrast, was more plausibly American. Though it was a territory rather than a state, it was closer to North America and significantly whiter than the others. As a result, there was talk of eventual statehood (whereas the Philippines was provisionally on track for independence).

Yet even when it came to Hawaii, Roosevelt felt a need to massage the point. Though the territory had a substantial white population, nearly three-quarters of its inhabitants were Asians or Pacific Islanders. Roosevelt clearly worried that his audience might regard Hawaii as foreign. So on the morning of his speech, he made another edit. He changed it so that the Japanese squadrons had bombed not the island of Oahu, but the American island of Oahu. Damage there, Roosevelt continued, had been done to American naval and military forces, and very many American lives had been lost.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «How to hide an empire: a history of the greater United States»

Look at similar books to How to hide an empire: a history of the greater United States. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «How to hide an empire: a history of the greater United States»

Discussion, reviews of the book How to hide an empire: a history of the greater United States and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.