Penny - Bitch Doctrine
Here you can read online Penny - Bitch Doctrine full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2014, publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:
Romance novel
Science fiction
Adventure
Detective
Science
History
Home and family
Prose
Art
Politics
Computer
Non-fiction
Religion
Business
Children
Humor
Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.
Bitch Doctrine: summary, description and annotation
We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Bitch Doctrine" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.
Penny: author's other books
Who wrote Bitch Doctrine? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.
Bitch Doctrine — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work
Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Bitch Doctrine" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
BITCH DOCTRINE
For my sisters, now and always
BY THE SAME AUTHOR
Unspeakable Things
BITCH DOCTRINE
Essays for Dissenting Adults
LAURIE PENNY
CONTENTS
Individuals bearing witness do not change history; only movements that understand their social world can do that.
Ellen Willis
Sometimes you have to be a bitch to get things done.
Madonna
In case you hadnt noticed, theres a war on. The field of battle is the human imagination. This is a book about the hard stuff, about the painful places where theory crashes into flesh and bone. Its a book about desire and control and contested bodies. Its a book about gender and power and violence, and about a world beyond them, which is scarier still.
As I write, it feels like the world is falling apart. A craven billionaire real-estate mogul and reality television shyster has just been elected to the presidency of the United States, swept to power by a wave of racist rage and violent populism. The British government is collapsing after the worst political crisis in living memory, the centre-left opposition is eating itself, bigots are getting brave in the streets and the stock markets are tumbling. Not for the first time in my years as a writer and a political thinker, I find myself wondering why I still care as much as I do about gender, about sexism, about power and identity. Arent there bigger things to worry about? Why cant we put these girlish things aside until after the revolution, when it comes, if it comes?
Ill tell you why. Because if the women dont win, nobody wins. If queer people and marginalised people and freaks and outsiders cannot live free, freedom is not worth the paper its printed on.
It is no longer an overstatement to suggest that toxic masculinity is killing the world. Feminists, of course, have been banging on about this in our shrill, hysterical way for years, but until the election of Donald J. Trump, the victories of the far right across Europe and the waves of violence against women and minorities that followed, nobody took us seriously. This book deals directly with that violence with the alt-right and the radicalisation of young men into extremism across the world, with the apoplectic male resentment that is consuming our culture from within. The feeling that men, particularly white, working-class men, have been cheated of their birthright is the root and centre of this discord. They are right that they have been cheated, but dangerously wrong about who pulled the con.
Some people believe that at times like this, the correct approach is to abandon identity politics and speak, instead, about class and only class. Even on the notional left, the usual suspects are at pains to point out that geopolitical disaster could have been avoided if we had all been less precious about gay rights and womens rights and Black Lives and concentrated on the issues that matter to real people. Real people meaning, of course, people who arent female, or queer, or brown, or from another country. You know, the people who really matter.
In the wake of successive victories for a new, frightening Nationalist Capitalism, commentators from all sides of the self-satisfied chin-stroking debate school are blaming identity politics. What they seem to mean by identity politics is politics that matter to people who arent white men in rural towns or young boys in bedrooms convinced that their inability to get laid is an injustice that must be answered in blood and suffering.
This is an idea that has remarkable staying power across a fractious and divided left: the idea that issues of race, gender and sexuality are at best a distraction from class politics and at worst a bourgeois tendency that will be destroyed after the revolution. The logic is that by focusing on issues of social justice, the political class has abandoned real working people to the vicissitudes of economic hardship.
This notion is horribly wrong, and the worst thing is that its wrong in the right direction, in the manner of a passenger plane that maintains a perfect flight path right until it slams into the field next to the runway. The political class has indeed rolled over and let kamikaze capitalism wreck the lives of working people around the world. Identity politics, however, have little to do with that cowardice. That the two are now yoked together in the popular imagination is something everyone who believes in a better world must answer for.
All politics are identity politics, but some identities are more politicised than others. The notion that the politics of identity and belonging have been allowed to overwhelm seemingly intractable issues of class, power and poverty is, in fact, entirely correct but this is not a problem for the traditional left. It is a problem for the traditional right, which has pursued a divide-and-conquer strategy for centuries, pitting white workers against black and brown workers, men against women, native-born citizens against foreigners in a hierarchy of victimhood that diverts energy and anger away from the vested interests bankrolling the entire scheme. When they promise to give you your country back, is that not identity politics? When they tell you that Muslims and migrants and uppity women are the real threat to your security, is that not identity politics? When they tell you that you will feel great again if only you stand behind the strong men waving the flag of white nationalism and chauvinist violence, what is that, if not a politics of identity infinitely more dangerous than any weve seen since the 1930s?
Its a shell game. A con. It did not start with Donald Trump, but the real-estate mogul and social-media tantrum artist has taken the Ponzi scheme to its logical conclusion. The president and his fellow travellers and sugar daddies have committed political fraud against the entire Western world. They have compounded it by making us believe as all good fraudsters do that it was our fault for being so naive in the first place.
It is, to some extent, reassuring to believe that its all our fault. If its all our fault for being too politically correct, too committed to diversity, if it was liberals and leftists who messed up by listening to these whining hippies with their patchouli-scented ideals of fairness and tolerance and police not shooting young black men dead for no reason, we might not have to face the more frightening notion that whats happening is, in fact, beyond our control.
The truth is that social justice and economic justice are not mutually exclusive. Those who would sacrifice one for the other will end up with neither, which is of course what the unscrupulous narcissists manspreading at the gates of power are counting on. The mainstream political left has, for generations, been unable to answer the core economic issues that shocking, I know, but hear me out affect the lives of all human beings, of every race, gender and background. For decades, in the face of late capitalist hegemony, all that the established left could realistically achieve has been to tweak the system incrementally, making things a little fairer for individual groups, without challenging the structural inequalities that created the injustice in the first place. This must change, and soon. Not just because of fine moral principles. Trying to fix economic policy without tackling structural inequality is not just morally misguided it is intellectually bankrupt.
Race, gender and sexuality are not side-issues in the current crisis. They are the bedrock and expression of that crisis. Capitalism has always divided its labour supply along lines of race and gender, ensuring that in times of crisis, we dont start setting fire to the machine, but to one another. All politics are identity politics, and this is no time to back away from our commitment to womens rights, racial justice and sexual equality. This is when we double down. The fight against the corporate neo-fascism funnelling out of every television set is not a fight that can be won if liberals, leftists and social-justice campaigners turn on one another. It is a fight that we will win together, or not at all.
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
Similar books «Bitch Doctrine»
Look at similar books to Bitch Doctrine. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.
Discussion, reviews of the book Bitch Doctrine and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.