Thomas - Skull wars: Kennewick Man, archaeology, and the battle for Native American identity

Skull wars: Kennewick Man, archaeology, and the battle for Native American identity — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Skull wars: Kennewick Man, archaeology, and the battle for Native American identity" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

↓

↑

Georgia Tahoma Arial Verdana

Reset

Interval:

↓

↑

Bookmark:

Make

1234567...102

Table of Contents

PRAISE FOR SKULL WARS:

From page one, Skull Wars is a book you cant put downpacked with fascinating, shocking, controversial and moving stories that present a sweeping picture of American archaeology and anthropology at its best and worst. It is beautifully written, impeccably researched, completely engrossing, and one of the best books on archaeology I have ever read.

Douglas Preston
Author of Cities of Gold and Thunderhead

Skull Wars is a very good piece of historical investigative journalism and ethnography that chronicles the rise of antagonisms between Indian, Anthro and Bureaucrat tribes. It will outrage the radicals on all sides and give solace and direction to those seeking solutions.

Don D. Fowler
Mamie Kleberg Professor of Historic Preservation and Anthropology
University of Nevada, Reno

Thomas has taken a very important issue and dissected it brilliantly for the general reader. His story and his messagethat we need to face history honestly and listen to each other carefullyshould be read by everyone who believes that science can serve humanity. He has done a great service to the cause of cross-cultural understanding.

Fred Hoxie
Swanlund Professor of History
University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign

Hurray for David Hurst Thomass Skull Wars! It is at once meticulously exact in the information presented, skillful in its narrative, and written in good, eloquent prose. A book, not a mere treatise, its moral purpose is to induce respectful and therefore productive relations between Thomass fellow archaeologists and the descendants of their subjects.

Roger G. Kennedy
Director Emeritus of the National Museum of American History,
former Director, National Park Service,
and author of Burr, Hamilton and Jefferson

Skull Wars is not just a good book but a great book: well-written, interesting, and evenhanded. Thomas does a fantastic job of showing how good research can be done in collaboration with the Indian community.

Clark Larsen
Amos Hawley Professor of Anthropology
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Skull Wars holds a mirror up to the archaeological community. By helping us see ourselves as we are, Thomas book will help us understand the sometimes awkward and contentious, but potentially enriching, relationships that can and must be forged between Native Americans and archaeologists.

David J. Meltzer
Southern Methodist University

Skull Wars treads on delicate and controversial historical ground avoided by many scientists. With characteristic and refreshing frankness, David Hurst Thomas explores competing visions of the early American past and points the way to a new scholarly world where archaeologists do not necessarily call the intellectual shots. This extraordinary and important book is bound to send shock waves through the halls of academe.

Brian Fagan
Author of The Great Journey and Floods, Famines, and Emperors

An outstanding scholarly study of the root causes of the distrust between archaeologists and Native American groups.... [An] important piece of work.

Library Journal

Thorough, detailed, important and well documented.

The Seattle Times

The ancient history of America is being rewritten, and David Hurst Thomas has written a report from the front lines.

Insight

A NOTE ABOUT HUMAN REMAINS

This book argues, among other things, that scientists must deal with human bones in a more respectful and sensitive manner. Several Native American elders have requested that I not publish photographs or other depictions of American Indian skeletal remains. In specific response to this request, no such images appear in this book.

A significant portion of the proceeds from this book are being donated to the Arthur Parker/Native American Scholarship Fund of the Society for American Archaeology. I believe strongly in this program, which is specifically designed to assist Indian people wishing to pursue advanced studies in archaeology. I respectfully request that other archaeologists writing booksfor-profit about American Indians give some serious thought to donating (at least part of) their royalties to the Parker Fund.

I believe its a wise investment.

DHT

FOREWORD

WE HAVE TOO much information today. We are saturated by isolated facts for which we have great difficulty finding any familiar context. Indeed, publication no longer means acceptance by a prestigious journal. It can often mean simply posting an item on the Internet or talking with a reporter. We have come to believe that what is new is true, and so almost anyone can represent anything by merely appearing as a public figure in a discussion. How then can we make sense of what we think we know? One pseudo-fact can become the pivotal point in a controversy no one understands. Nowhere is this condition more endemic than the social sciences, but geology and archaeology contribute more than their share of confusion.

The social sciences badly need to take a break, collect their thoughts, begin to produce reliable histories of their respective disciplines, and clearly articulate their fundamental doctrines so that we can see the various trees of thought that represent the forests in which we labor. At present only people trained in the various social sciences have any idea where they began, where they have traveled, and where they are now. Lay people have not the slightest notion where social science doctrines and ideas originate. Nor do they know what are acceptable beliefs to which a majority of any discipline would subscribe. Scholars working in other disciplines rarely get a glimpse into the inner working of neighboring sciences, so they accept much of the core scientific doctrine in the belief that others have been as rigorous, informed, and sincere as themselves.

The Law provides a sensible and useful model for the social sciences to consider. Recognizing that doctrines change with the passage of time, the development of new theories, and the admissibility of new kinds of evidence, the legal profession has a practice of appointing a prestigious committee of experienced scholars and practicing lawyers to review the various fields of law and issue what are called Restatements. These documents summarize the current state of such topics as contracts, torts, procedure, and so forth. Judges, justices, practicing attorneys, legal aids, and interested lay people can turn to the Restatements and find an authoritative interpretation of the state of law without engaging in endless searches or being drawn into internecine battles about the primacy of any particular doctrine.

Such a practice might be immensely useful to the rest of the academic disciplines in ensuring that they remain credible sources of reliable information. The American Anthropological Association sent a statement to the Bureau of the Census in 1998 stating that race could not be determined scientifically. At the same time several prominent scholars were in federal court claiming that they had an overwhelming need to do tests on a skeleton found on the banks of the Columbia River, and many archaeologists encouraged the media to believe that they could determine the race of the remains. How can we have such conflicting views? What is the orthodox and proven here and what is speculation?.

Next page

1234567...102

Light

Font size:

↓

↑

Georgia Tahoma Arial Verdana

Reset

Interval:

↓

↑

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Skull wars: Kennewick Man, archaeology, and the battle for Native American identity»

Look at similar books to Skull wars: Kennewick Man, archaeology, and the battle for Native American identity. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.

Alexandra Harmon

Rich Indians: Native People and the Problem of Wealth in American History

My Ebook Publishing House

The American Indians

Wayne E. Lee

The Other Face of Battle: Americas Forgotten Wars and the Experience of Combat

Rose

How wars end: why we always fight the last battle: a history of American intervention from World War I to Afghanistan

Kion

Kennewick

Mark Lardas

Native American Mounted Rifleman 1861–65

Ross

Native Americans: American History: An Overview of Native American History: Your Guide To: Native People, Indians, & Indian History

Joe Watkins

Indigenous Archaeology: American Indian Values and Scientific Practice

David H. Thomas

Skull Wars: Kennewick Man, Archaeology, And The Battle For Native American Identity

Nancy Warren Ferrell

The Battle of the Little Bighorn in United States History

Thomas A. Britten

American Indians in World War I: at home and at war

Bertha P. Dutton

American Indians of the Southwest

Discussion, reviews of the book Skull wars: Kennewick Man, archaeology, and the battle for Native American identity and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.