• Complain

Skidelsky - Money and government: the past and future of economics

Here you can read online Skidelsky - Money and government: the past and future of economics full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: New Haven London, year: 2018, publisher: Yale University Press, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Money and government: the past and future of economics
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Yale University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2018
  • City:
    New Haven London
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Money and government: the past and future of economics: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Money and government: the past and future of economics" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

A critical examination of economicss past and future, and how it needs to change, by one of the most eminent political economists of our time
The dominant view in economics is that money and government should play only a minor role in economic life. Economic outcomes, it is claimed, are best left to the invisible hand of the market. Yet these claims remain staunchly unsettled. The view taken in this important new book is that the omnipresence of uncertainty makes money and government essential features of any market economy.
Since Adam Smith, classical economics has espoused nonintervention in markets. The Great Depression brought Keynesian economics to the fore, but stagflation in the 1970s brought a return to small-state orthodoxy. The 2008 global financial crash should have brought a reevaluation of that stance; instead the response has been punishing austerity and anemic recovery. This book aims to reintroduce Keyness central insights to a new generation of economists, and embolden them to return money and government to the starring roles in the economic drama that they deserve.

Skidelsky: author's other books


Who wrote Money and government: the past and future of economics? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Money and government: the past and future of economics — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Money and government: the past and future of economics" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Money and Government

ROBERT SKIDELSKY

Money and Government

The Past and Future of Economics

First published in the United States in 2018 by Yale University Press First - photo 1

First published in the United States in 2018 by Yale University Press.
First published in the United Kingdom in 2018 by Penguin Books Ltd., London,
as Money and Government: A Challenge to Mainstream Economics.

Copyright 2018 by Robert Skidelsky. The moral right of the author has been asserted. All rights reserved.

This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers.

Yale University Press books may be purchased in quantity for educational, business, or promotional use. For information, please e-mail (U.K. office).

Typeset in 10.5/14 pt Sabon LT Std by Jouve (U.K.), Milton Keynes.
Printed in the United States of America.

Library of Congress Control Number: 2018954397
ISBN 978-0-300-24032-0 (hardcover : alk. paper)

This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992
(Permanence of Paper).

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

To students of political economy, young and old

Contents
Figures
Preface

We are at a junction where the whole of macroeconomic policy is up for grabs. Everything we thought settled by the Great Moderation of the fifteen pre-recession years, a period of exceptional stability in Western economies, has been thrown into turmoil by the scale of the collapse of 20089 and the feebleness of the recovery from it. That poses a mighty challenge for the ruling economic doctrines. Policy will shift, is already changing; textbooks will have to be revised. Economics in the future will need to reflect much more on where it has come from and what it needs to do.

This book aims to build a new audience for economics while, at the same time, being of interest to the professional economist. It attempts to bridge the gap between popular books inspired by the crisis, which economists dont read, and economists analyses of the crisis, which non-economists cannot understand.

It started off as a series of lectures to third-year economics students at the University of Warwick, and I am grateful to the Department of Economics for allowing me to put into practice my ideas of how economics should be taught. The book seeks to enfold technical issues in what, for want of a better term, may be called political economy. I am interested in the interplay between economic ideas and the circumstances in which they rise, flourish and decay. My account of what went wrong in 20089 is grounded in the historical debates on economic policy. The proposals in the last chapter for a new framework for economic policy are derived from the lessons I draw from both this history and the Great Recession itself.

Britain has been my chief witness for the defence and prosecution. This reflects the limitations of my own knowledge, but it is not the entire reason for my focus. For much of the period, and for many of the events covered by this book, Britain was the pacemaker and rule-setter for the global economy, an amazing achievement for a country with just 1 per cent of the worlds population (it went briefly up to 2 per cent in the 1850s). David Hume, Adam Smith, David Ricardo, John Stuart Mill, Alfred Marshall and John Maynard Keynes towered over the economics of their day; Britain was the first modern gold-standard nation, the first commercial society, and the first industrial nation. The City of London bestrode the world of international finance; the Victorian fiscal constitution provided a universal model of good government; and Britain possessed adequate hard power to enforce the rules of a liberal international trading order. It was from the Manchester system that Karl Marx and Friedrich List, the great nineteenth-century continental dissidents, tried to distil their lessons; and, much later, Karl Polanyi took Britain as his case study of the wrenching effects of the market economy.

I am talking here about the mainstream classical and neo-classical economics tradition. Nineteenth-century economic practice was always much more pluralist than mainstream doctrine. But though there were many dissenters from the SmithRicardo school, there were no serious analytical challengers that is, until Keynes in the twentieth century.

In the first half of the twentieth century, economics became much more pluralist in parallel with the convulsions of the world wars, the Great Depression, and the decay of British power. Keynes was the last economics leader from Britain. After the Second World War, the centre of gravity in Western economics shifted decisively to the United States, the new political hegemon, while the dissenting voices of Marxism and Protectionism continued to hold sway in developing countries, and the communist world built a Pharaonic system that dispensed with Western economics altogether. By the 1990s, with the fall of communism, economics had become an almost wholly American-owned subsidiary, the charter of globalization. Today, with the decay of American power and following the Great Recession of 20089, another geopolitical and intellectual shift is taking place.

I have not attempted a general history of economics, which would certainly include many great thinkers and important schools not mentioned here, but only that part of it which seemed most important for understanding the economic collapse of 20089; hence my focus on the unsettled issues of money and government. In my approach, I have been chiefly influenced by Keynes, whose biography I have written. However, as the book progressed I became increasingly drawn to the insights of Karl Polanyi, with his insistence that, to be viable, a market order has to be embedded in a framework of rules, policies and institutions. This insight has been somewhat neglected by the dominant school of Anglo-American economics.

My debts have accumulated. I would in particular like to thank Spencer Boxer, Gordon Brown, Oliver Bush, Andrea Califano, Tim Congdon, Paul Davidson, Michael Davies, Meghnad Desai, Tommaso Gabellini, Jamie Galbraith, Simone Gasperin, Andy Haldane, Geoffrey Harcourt, Michael Kennedy, David Laidler, Laurie Laybourn Langton, Toby Lewis, Felix Martin, Vladimir Masch, Marcus Miller, George Peden, Atanos Pekanov, Philip Pilkington, Edward Skidelsky, Leanne Stickland, David Sturrock, Thomas Tozer, Christopher Tugendhat, Paul Westbrook and Christian Westerlind Wigstrom. Their help has been invaluable; the approach is my own.

Introduction
I. UNSETTLED ISSUES

Macroeconomics is about money and government, and their relationship. The unsettled questions in macroeconomic policy stem from disputes about the part money plays in economic life, and the part government should play. For 250 years, the dominant view of the economic profession has been that money is of no importance except when it gets out of order, and that government interference with the market usually makes things worse. You cant buck the market, Mrs Thatcher famously declared. A competitive market economy, it was claimed, has an automatic tendency to full employment. Disturbances to employment are the result of interference, usually by or at the behest of governments, creating or promoting monopolies, impeding price adjustments or, crucially, by monkeying around with the money supply, thus inducing people to trade at the wrong prices. At first it was believed that control of money should be entrusted to the gold standard; when the gold standard broke down, to independent central banks. Government should be limited to ensuring the conditions required for efficient market exchange. The only task of macro policy was to control the money supply.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Money and government: the past and future of economics»

Look at similar books to Money and government: the past and future of economics. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Money and government: the past and future of economics»

Discussion, reviews of the book Money and government: the past and future of economics and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.