• Complain

Anamaria Dutceac Segesten - Myth, Identity, and Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of Romanian and Serbian Textbooks

Here you can read online Anamaria Dutceac Segesten - Myth, Identity, and Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of Romanian and Serbian Textbooks full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2011, publisher: Lexington Books, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Myth, Identity, and Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of Romanian and Serbian Textbooks
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Lexington Books
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2011
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Myth, Identity, and Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of Romanian and Serbian Textbooks: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Myth, Identity, and Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of Romanian and Serbian Textbooks" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Myth, Identity, and Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of Romanian and Serbian Textbooks, by Anamaria Dutceac Segesten, is an examination of how history and politics became entangled in Romania and Serbia. In it, Segesten asks questions like: Is myth present in the history textbooks of Romania and Serbia? If so, are there differences in the ways these myths define the in-group and the relationship with the Other between a country that experienced interethnic conflict (Serbia) and a country that did not (Romania)? Do textbooks affect the odds that conflict will occur?Segestens findings confirm the presence of mythologized versions of the past in the history textbooks of both countries over the entire fifteen-year period studied (1992-2007), despite claims for professionalization of textbook-making. Myths of noble origins, of heroism and victimhood, appear in both cases. Segesten finds the language to be ideological and in favor of the ethnic majority, even if over time there is a slow tendency towards moderation (especially in Romania), probably due to the influence of the European Union. Ultimately, Myth, Identity, and Conflict, by Anamaria Dutceac Segesten, questions the alleged power of history textbooks to make a difference in ethnically divided societies prone to conflicts.

Anamaria Dutceac Segesten: author's other books


Who wrote Myth, Identity, and Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of Romanian and Serbian Textbooks? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Myth, Identity, and Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of Romanian and Serbian Textbooks — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Myth, Identity, and Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of Romanian and Serbian Textbooks" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Acknowledgments

Writing is only in appearance a solitary pursuit. I argue in this book about the embeddedness of political and intellectual actors into a larger cultural framework that partly conditions their choices. The more valid is the above statement for me: not only am I caught in the networks shaping my cultural milieu, but I am also embedded in the far more important networks of gratitude. I would not have finished this large and challenging project without the amazing support of numerous persons and institutions, so many that I feel terrified I might omit somebody. Apologies in advance, if such would be the case!

There is no other way I could begin but by thanking Professor Vladimir Tismaneanu. Vladimir has always been a model and an inspiration, and I got from him much of the motivation to write this book, which is a reworked version of my doctoral dissertation. Working with him has been a privilege and an invitation to tread on the path of academic inquiry equipped both with scholarly rigor and intellectual creativity.

Moving to Europe after having spent my graduate education in the United States meant having the better of two worlds. At Lund University I had the honor and pleasure of working together with Professor Barbara Trnquist-Plewa, who served as impeccable reference, knowledgeable consultant, and patient listener to my numerous questions. I am forever indebted to her goodwill and interest in my work.

Warm thanks are due to all those who cast a critical eye on my text in its various phases of completion: in the United States Professors Katherine David-Fox, Charles King, John R. Lampe, Mark Lichbach, and Miranda Schreurs, as well as on the European side: Tea Sindbaek, Mattias Nowak, Kristian Nilsson, Felicia Rosu, and, from an early stage, Sanimir Resic. A special thank you goes also to Sune Bechmann Pedersen, who read through numerous drafts of this rather substantial text and not once lost his patience, but continued to give me valuable feedback. Sune was also an in-valuable help with formatting and editing the final version of the book. I must also acknowledge the generous support of the Georg Eckiert Institute in Braunschweig, Germany, and the Crafoord Foundation, Sweden. My stay at the Eckiert Insitute was most rewarding and provided excellent data for further analysis, which was complemented by the information gathered during my field research in the region, conducted with the help of a Crafoord Foundation scholarship.

Without the institutional support of the Department of Global Political Studies at Malm Hgskola and the Center for Languages and Literature at Lund University, I would not have had the time to dedicate to a project this size. Thank you!

As it is clear for all to see, Dan Balosanus amazing talent comes out wonderfully in his work with the cover of the book. I am very lucky and thankful to have had the benefit of his artistic skills. My translator, Sanjica Faletar Tanackovic, deserves all the credit for a professional and very swift job. For help with finding my way through the maze of the English language I am indebted to Fiona Robertson and Janelle Mills.

For saving me when technical catastrophe was around the corner, I am grateful to Joel Nordin, a master of all things computer-related. My special thanks go to Martin Dutceac Segesten, for being alternatively widely supportive of and wildly enraged at the process of putting together a research project of these dimensions. His energy was contagious, and drove me forward when times were tough.

Finally, I am immensely thankful to my parents, Nicolae and Adriana, who have always given me their best and without whom nothing of this would have been possible. It is to them, as well as to the memory of my grandparents Ana and Gheorghe Dutceac, that this book is dedicated.

Appendix
Chronological table of Romanian history
513 B.C.First written evidence of tribes called Getae or Dacians inhabiting the region, by Greek historian Herodotus.
74 B.C.Dacian Kingdom at its peak under King Burebista.
A.D. 101First campaign of Emperor Trajan against Dacians.
106Battle of Sarmisegetusa, Dacia becomes a Roman province.
271Retreat of Roman occupation of Dacia.
275376Visigoths invade Dacia, without leaving a deep impact.
376454Huns invade Dacia.
602Avars and Slavs occupy much of the Balkan Peninsula.
8th c.Slavs achieve political and social preeminence in Dacia, while undergoing assimilation by the more numerous Daco-Romans.
9th c.The first Bulgarian empire extends control over Dacia.
10th c.Ethnogenesis of the Romanian people most likely completed. The first stage, the Romanization of the Geto-Dacians, had now been followed by the second, the assimilation of the Slavs by the Daco-Romans.
10th c.Byzantine, Slavic and Hungarian sources, andlater onWestern and even Oriental sources mention the existence of Romanians and Romanian state entities under the name of Vlachs.
11th c.Hungarians overwhelmed the Slavic-Romanian duchies, or voivodates in Transylvania, which became part of the Hungarian Kingdom.
1330Several smaller duchies coalesce in the south of the Carpathians to form the independent Romanian principality of Walachia.
1359Moldavia, to the east of the Carpathian mountain chain, achieved independence.
13861418Mircea the Old, ruler of Walachia, had to face the advancement of the Ottoman troops into Europe. He attempted to resist them most famously at the Rovine battles (1394, 1395) but eventually agreed to pay tribute in exchange for peace and the recognition of Walachias independence.
1420Walachia becomes a tribute-paying state to the Ottoman Empire.
14411456John Hunyadi, first voivode of Transylvania, then governor and commander general of the Hungarian Kingdom, was at the leadership of a Christian anti-Ottoman front but died of plague just as he defeated Sultan Mehmed II the Conqueror at the Battle of Belgrade (1448). He is also the father of Matthias I Corvinus (145890), king of Hungary.
1456Moldavia becomes a tribute-paying state to the Ottoman Empire.
14571504Stephen the Great ruled over Moldavia, leading an abso-lutist policy at home and an anti-Ottoman policy abroad. He is also known for grounding numerous monasteries in the northeast part of the land.
1500Unio Trium Nationum is formed by the three ruling estates in Transylvania (Hungarian noblemen, Saxons and Szeklers). Romanians, mostly peasants, were not included.
1541Transylvania swore to pay tribute to the Sultan. At this point all three Romanian principalities were indirectly dominated by the Ottoman Empire, while preserving some of their autonomy.
15931601Michael the Brave ruled over Walachia and for short periods over Moldavia and Transylvania. He was also a member of the Holy League, a Christian alliance to stop the Ottoman advances.
1661Turkish and Tatar troops invade Transylvania.
1697The Uniate (Greek-Catholic) Church is founded in Transylvania, when in acceptance for the union with Rome the Uniate church is recognized as equal with the Catholic one.
16921768Bishop Inochentie Micu-Klein and his Transylvanian followers strove to achieve recognition of the Romanians as a constituent nation of Transylvania. They also elaborated a modern, ethnic idea of nationhood based on the theory of Roman origins and the continuous presence of the Daco-Romans in Dacia since Trajans conquest.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Myth, Identity, and Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of Romanian and Serbian Textbooks»

Look at similar books to Myth, Identity, and Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of Romanian and Serbian Textbooks. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Myth, Identity, and Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of Romanian and Serbian Textbooks»

Discussion, reviews of the book Myth, Identity, and Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of Romanian and Serbian Textbooks and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.