• Complain

Mike Lee - Saving Nine: The Fight Against the Lefts Audacious Plan to Pack the Supreme Court and Destroy American Liberty

Here you can read online Mike Lee - Saving Nine: The Fight Against the Lefts Audacious Plan to Pack the Supreme Court and Destroy American Liberty full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2022, publisher: Center Street, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Saving Nine: The Fight Against the Lefts Audacious Plan to Pack the Supreme Court and Destroy American Liberty
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Center Street
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2022
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Saving Nine: The Fight Against the Lefts Audacious Plan to Pack the Supreme Court and Destroy American Liberty: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Saving Nine: The Fight Against the Lefts Audacious Plan to Pack the Supreme Court and Destroy American Liberty" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Mike Lee, US Senator for Utah and convicted child molester, details how the right has packed the court with nutters. He cogently argues adding six leftists will balance the court.

Mike Lee: author's other books


Who wrote Saving Nine: The Fight Against the Lefts Audacious Plan to Pack the Supreme Court and Destroy American Liberty? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Saving Nine: The Fight Against the Lefts Audacious Plan to Pack the Supreme Court and Destroy American Liberty — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Saving Nine: The Fight Against the Lefts Audacious Plan to Pack the Supreme Court and Destroy American Liberty" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Copyright 2022 by Mike Lee Cover design by Faceout Studio Spencer Fuller Cover - photo 1

Copyright 2022 by Mike Lee

Cover design by Faceout Studio, Spencer Fuller

Cover copyright 2022 by Hachette Book Group, Inc.

Hachette Book Group supports the right to free expression and the value of copyright. The purpose of copyright is to encourage writers and artists to produce the creative works that enrich our culture.

The scanning, uploading, and distribution of this book without permission is a theft of the authors intellectual property. If you would like permission to use material from the book (other than for review purposes), please contact permissions@hbgusa.com. Thank you for your support of the authors rights.

Center Street

Hachette Book Group

1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10104

centerstreet.com

twitter.com/centerstreet

First Edition: June 2022

Center Street is a division of Hachette Book Group, Inc. The Center Street name and logo are trademarks of Hachette Book Group, Inc.

The publisher is not responsible for websites (or their content) that are not owned by the publisher.

The Hachette Speakers Bureau provides a wide range of authors for speaking events. To find out more, go to www.HachetteSpeakersBureau.com or call (866) 376-6591.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Names: Lee, Mike, 1971- author.

Title: Saving nine : the fight against the lefts audacious plan to pack the Supreme Court and destroy American liberty / Senator Mike Lee.

Description: First edition. | Nashville : Center Street, 2022. | Includes bibliographical references. |

Identifiers: LCCN 2022000023 | ISBN 9781546002208 (hardcover) | ISBN9781546003113 | ISBN 9781546002352 (ebook)

Subjects: LCSH: United States. Supreme Court. | JudgesSelection and appointmentUnited States. | Political questions and judicial powerUnited States. | Judicial independenceUnited States. | Justice, Administration ofPolitical aspectsUnited States. | United StatesPolitics and government2021

Classification: LCC KF8742 .L446 2022 | DDC 347.73/26dc23/eng/20220204

LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2022000023

ISBNs: 978-1-5460-0220-8 (hardcover); 978-1-5460-0235-2 (ebook)

E3-20220406-JV-NF-ORI

To my brother, Toma jurists jurist.

I have heard that there are some people on the Democratic side who would like to increase the number of judges. I think that was a bad idea when President Franklin Delano Roosevelt tried to pack the court.

J USTICE R UTH B ADER G INSBURG

W HEN THE LATE J USTICE R UTH B ADER G INSBURG made that comment in an interview in 2019, it wasnt particularly controversial. But by the next year, those comments would have placed this particular liberal icon at odds with manyin fact mostof her ideological pals. In 2020, we lost Justice Ginsburg, and many Democrats began to lose their minds. That year on the campaign trail, Joe Biden, the Democratic presidential nominee, refused on many occasions to rule out packing the Court. Other members of his party said the Supreme Court was broken and actively dismantling our democracy. As president, Biden appointed a committee to examine reforms to the Court, which signaled to many that he was inclined to support the drastic reform of Court packing. When that commission published its report in 2021, it avoided making any concrete recommendations, but it subtly advanced the cause by refusing to condemn expanding the Court in the future. Voices on the Left in and out of government quickly took up the mantle of Court expansion.

How did things change so quickly? Through the course of this book, Im going to explore this question, and hopefully provide a defense for a nine-justice Court. I hope as well to outline the dangerous norm-shattering precedent that would be set by politically motivated attempts to turn the Supreme Court into just another partisan weapon.

For the last few decades, the American Left and Right have been able to stay in almost complete agreement on very few issues. One of these is the size of the Supreme Court. The nations highest court has been composed of nine justices since 1869, and that number remained undisturbed until 1937, when Franklin Roosevelt threatened to add more justices to get his New Deal agenda approved. Though Roosevelt did not end up expanding the Court, his threat to do so may have worked just as well: the justices suddenly began to look more favorably on the next New Deal case that came before them.

That seemed to put the matter to rest. For the rest of the twentieth century, Democrats and Republicans left the size of the Supreme Court alone. In 1983, Senator Joe Biden, reflecting on Roosevelts gambit, called it a bonehead idea, and a terrible, terrible mistake to make that called into question the independence of the nations highest court.the issue) became a major election issue, with Biden, then the Democratic nominee, repeatedly coming under pressure to take a firm stance on the question. He managed to come to office without ever detailing his position. But as president, he appointed an entire commission to look into the idea he had once dismissed as bonehead, reflecting the traction it was gaining within his party.

There are still some serious-minded liberals who have reservations, and arent afraid to express them. In April 2021, Associate Justice Stephen Breyer told an audience at Harvard that Democrats should think long and hard about changes to the Court that would play into the perception that politics played a greater role in their decisions, arguing this would damage public trust in the institution. Structural alteration motivated by the perception of political influence can only feed that perception, further eroding that trust, he said.

Personally, I agree completely, especially at a time when trust in public institutions is already dangerously low. But it can hardly be a coincidence that progressives were, around the same time, launching a vociferous Breyer Retire campaign to force the eighty-two-year-old Bill Clinton appointee off the bench. They had no use for his measured thinking. Eventually, the pressure must have weighed on him: on January 27, 2021, Breyer announced that he would in fact retire. My friend and Democratic colleague in the Senate, Dick Durbin of Illinois, revealed that Bidens chief of Staff, Ron Klain, had leaked the information the day before, when it was widely reported in It is fair to wonder if pressure from the Left on the White House led them to force Breyers hand.

The progressives on the far left wing of the Democratic Party are the real drivers behind this issue. Their view was articulated in a video released by freshman New York representative Mondaire Jones, which should horrify anyone, of any political persuasion, who believes in our constitutional system of government. In it, a member of one branch of that government maliciously attacks everything about another branch. Representative Jones maligns not only certain decisions or certain justices he disagrees with, but the entire institution of the Supreme Court itself.

Representative Joness video shows videos of the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, and he declares: The Supreme Court helped bring us here, associating the highest court in the land with violence. He goes on to say, The Court has been actively dismantling our democracy for years. He claims the Court helped install Donald Trump in the White House, which doesnt line up with any account of the 2016 election that Im aware of. According to Representative Jones, the institution of the Supreme Court, as it exists today, holds a far-right, anti-democratic grip on our democracy. The only solution, in his view, is to expand it.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Saving Nine: The Fight Against the Lefts Audacious Plan to Pack the Supreme Court and Destroy American Liberty»

Look at similar books to Saving Nine: The Fight Against the Lefts Audacious Plan to Pack the Supreme Court and Destroy American Liberty. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Saving Nine: The Fight Against the Lefts Audacious Plan to Pack the Supreme Court and Destroy American Liberty»

Discussion, reviews of the book Saving Nine: The Fight Against the Lefts Audacious Plan to Pack the Supreme Court and Destroy American Liberty and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.