• Complain

Alexander Hirsch - Theorizing Post-Conflict Reconciliation: Agonism, Restitution and Repair

Here you can read online Alexander Hirsch - Theorizing Post-Conflict Reconciliation: Agonism, Restitution and Repair full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2011, publisher: Routledge, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Alexander Hirsch Theorizing Post-Conflict Reconciliation: Agonism, Restitution and Repair
  • Book:
    Theorizing Post-Conflict Reconciliation: Agonism, Restitution and Repair
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Routledge
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2011
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Theorizing Post-Conflict Reconciliation: Agonism, Restitution and Repair: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Theorizing Post-Conflict Reconciliation: Agonism, Restitution and Repair" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Alexander Hirsch: author's other books


Who wrote Theorizing Post-Conflict Reconciliation: Agonism, Restitution and Repair? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Theorizing Post-Conflict Reconciliation: Agonism, Restitution and Repair — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Theorizing Post-Conflict Reconciliation: Agonism, Restitution and Repair" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
What does it mean to promote reconciliation in response to violent conflict? When do practices of reconciliation function to obfuscate past wrongs, silence victims, or neutralize political dissent? These are urgent questions, as institutions and policies designed to alleviate political conflict are currently being developed across the globe. Against the view that reconciliation entails social harmony and consensus, this volume offers an agonistic alternativeone that affirms dissensus and ongoing contestation. These essays explore, and powerfully unsettle, prevailing assumptions regarding the role of forgiveness, tolerance, healing, memorializing, and responsibility, as responses to past violence. Drawing on a dazzling array of theoretical resources, including thinkers such as Giorgio Agamben, Jean Amry, Walter Benjamin, and Walt Whitman, these essays are also grounded in, and informed by, specific cases and institutions. This collection is not only a magnificent work of political theory, but also a brilliant and timely innovation in scholarship on transitional justice.
Bronwyn Leebaw, Associate Professor of Political Science,
University of California, Riverside, CA, USA
The authors of Theorizing Post-Conflict Reconciliation bring the conceptual tools of agonistic democratic theory to the study of a range of hard cases of post-conflict reconciliation. The result is ground-breaking. They call into question the dominant approach of transitional justice and enable us to see these situations in a new and more complex light. The volume will be of great interest to scholars and students of both the theory and practice of reconciliation.
James Tully,Distinguished Professor,
University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Theorizing Post-Conflict
Reconciliation
The founding of truth commissions, legal tribunals and public confessionals in places like South Africa, Australia, Yugoslavia and Chile have attempted to heal wounds and bring about reconciliation in societies divided by a history of violence and conflict.
This volume asks how many of the popular conclusions reached by transitional justice studies fall short, or worse, unwittingly perpetuate the very injustices they aim to suture. Though often well intentioned, these approaches generally resolve in an injunction to move on, to leave the painful past behind in the name of a conciliatory future. Through collective acts of apology and forgiveness, so the argument goes, reparation and restoration are imparted, and the writhing conflict of the past is substituted for by the overlapping consensus of community. And yet all too often, the authors of this study maintain, the work done in assuaging past discord serves to further debase and politically neutralize especially the victims of abuse in need of reconciliation and repair in the first place.
Drawing on a wide range of case studies, from South Africa to Northern Ireland, Bosnia, Rwanda and Australia, the authors argue for an alternative approach to post-conflict thought. In so doing, they find inspiration in the vision of politics rendered by new pluralist, new realist and especially agonistic political theory.
Featuring contributions from both up-and-coming and well-established scholars, this work is essential reading for all those with an interest in restorative justice, conflict resolution and peace studies.
Alexander Keller Hirsch is Lecturer in the Political Science Department at Northeastern University, and Research Fellow at the University of California Humanities Research Institute, USA.
Interventions
Edited by: Jenny Edkins, Aberystwyth University and
Nick Vaughan-Williams, University of Warwick
As Michel Foucault has famously stated, Knowledge is not made for understanding; it is made for cutting. In this spirit The Edkins-Vaughan-Williams Interventions series solicits cutting edge, critical works that challenge mainstream understandings in international relations. It is the best place to contribute post- disciplinary works that think rather than merely recognize and affirm the world recycled in IR's traditional geopolitical imaginary.
Michael J. Shapiro, University of Hawai'i at Mnoa, USA
The series aims to advance understanding of the key areas in which scholars working within broad critical post-structural and post-colonial traditions have chosen to make their interventions, and to present innovative analyses of important topics.
Titles in the series engage with critical thinkers in philosophy, sociology, politics and other disciplines, and provide situated historical, empirical and textual studies in international politics.
Critical Theorists and International
Relations

Edited by Jenny Edkins and
Nick Vaughan-Williams
Ethics as Foreign Policy
Britain, the EU and the other
Dan Bulley
Universality, Ethics and International
Relations

A grammatical reading
Vronique Pin-Fat
Insuring Security
Biopolitics, security and risk
Luis Lobo-Guerrero
Foucault and International Relations
New critical engagements
Edited by Nicholas J. Kiersey and
Doug Stokes
International Relations and Non
Western Thought

Imperialism, colonialism and
investigations of global modernity
Edited by Robbie Shilliam
The Time of the City
Politics, philosophy, and genre
Michael J. Shapiro
Governing Sustainable Development
Partnership, protest and power at the
World Summit
Carl Death
Madness in International Relations
Psychology, security and the global
governance of mental health
Alison Howell
Spatiality, Sovereignty and Carl Schmitt
Geographies of the nomos
Edited by Stephen Legg
Politics of Urbanism
Seeing like a city
Warren Magnusson
Beyond Biopolitics
Theory, violence and horror in world politics
Franois Debrix and Alexander D. Barder
The Politics of Speed
Capitalism, the state and war in an
accelerating world
Simon Glezos
Autobiographical International
Relations

I, IR
Edited by Naeem Inayatullah
War and Rape
Law, memory and justice
Nicola Henry
Politics and the Art of Commemoration
Memorials to struggle in Latin America
and Spain
Katherine Hite
Indian Foreign Policy
The politics of postcolonial identity
Priya Chacko
Politics of the Event
Time, movement, becoming
Tom Lundborg
Theorizing Post-Conflict Reconciliation
Agonism, restitution and repair
Edited by Alexander Keller Hirsch
Theorizing Post-Conflict
Reconciliation
Agonism, restitution and repair
Edited by
Alexander Keller Hirsch
Theorizing Post-Conflict Reconciliation Agonism Restitution and Repair - image 1
First published 2012
by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN
Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada
by Routledge
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
2012 Editorial and selected matter: Alexander Keller Hirsch,
Contributors, their contributions
The right of Alexander Keller Hirsch to be identified as editor of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Theorizing Post-Conflict Reconciliation: Agonism, Restitution and Repair»

Look at similar books to Theorizing Post-Conflict Reconciliation: Agonism, Restitution and Repair. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Theorizing Post-Conflict Reconciliation: Agonism, Restitution and Repair»

Discussion, reviews of the book Theorizing Post-Conflict Reconciliation: Agonism, Restitution and Repair and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.