• Complain

Donald T. Critchlow - Takeover: How the Left’s Quest for Social Justice Corrupted Liberalism

Here you can read online Donald T. Critchlow - Takeover: How the Left’s Quest for Social Justice Corrupted Liberalism full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2012, publisher: Open Road Media, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Donald T. Critchlow Takeover: How the Left’s Quest for Social Justice Corrupted Liberalism

Takeover: How the Left’s Quest for Social Justice Corrupted Liberalism: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Takeover: How the Left’s Quest for Social Justice Corrupted Liberalism" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

How did liberals get to be the way they are today?Thats the question many Americans have been asking--particularly after the ascent of Barack Obama, the most left-wing president in American history. At last, historians Donald T. Critchlow and W. J. Rorabaugh supply the answer.The authors show that it is a mistake to see the Obama administrations sweeping agenda as a single mans vision. Equally flawed, they reveal, is the now-common argument that todays liberalism is simply a continuation of the progressivism that Woodrow Wilson embodied a century ago. Todays Left has embraced a more radical vision for transformative change: to remake nearly every aspect of American life.Takeover completely reshapes our understanding of Americas current political situation. This bold revisionist history delineates the sharp break in the history of modern liberalism that began in the 1960s, when new-style progressive activists left behind their protest rallies to infiltrate the establishment.Critchlow and Rorabaugh reveal:-How Obama almost certainly could not have become president if 1970s progressive activists had not rewritten the Democratic Partys presidential nominating rules-How radical leaders pioneered the use of the courts to impose their agenda-From Roe v. Wade to Dr. Kevorkian: how partial-birth abortion became the right to choose and euthanasia became the right to die with dignity-The inside story of liberals decades-long struggle to nationalize health care-How todays environmentalism reflects the Lefts anticorporate, anticonsumption ethos-The progressive paradox: how elites gain more control even as they employ the rhetoric of choice and power to the peopleCritchlow and Rorabaugh masterfully connect the dots in Americas recent history, showing the close links among such seemingly unrelated causes as radical environmentalism, nationalized health care, class warfare, abortion rights, feminism, caps on energy use, assisted suicide, and sex education. Takeover will forever change how you view liberalism and the political debate in America.

Donald T. Critchlow: author's other books


Who wrote Takeover: How the Left’s Quest for Social Justice Corrupted Liberalism? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Takeover: How the Left’s Quest for Social Justice Corrupted Liberalism — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Takeover: How the Left’s Quest for Social Justice Corrupted Liberalism" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
TAKEOVER
How the Lefts Quest for Social Justice
Corrupted Liberalism
Takeover How the Lefts Quest for Social Justice Corrupted Liberalism - image 1
Donald T. Critchlow and
W. J. Rorabaugh
Takeover How the Lefts Quest for Social Justice Corrupted Liberalism - image 2
Wilmington , Delaware
Contents
Introduction
The New Progressives
H ow did liberals get to be the way they are today?
This book answers that important question. It is a question more and more Americans began asking as they witnessed the ascent of Barack Obama, the most left-wing Democrat to be nominated for president since George McGovern in 1972 and arguably the most progressive president ever elected.
Searching for answers, many commentators have looked back to the progressive movement of the early twentieth century. To observers such as talk radio host Glenn Beck, author Jonah Goldberg, and historian Ronald J. Pestritto, modern liberalism is of a piece with the progressivism that President Woodrow Wilson embodied a century ago. To be sure, todays liberals, many of whom embrace the label progressive, share the older progressive faith in using governmental power to address societal ills. But this focus on the similarities between modern liberalism and early-twentieth-century progressivism overlooks a sharp break in the history of liberalism that began in the 1960s. Only by understanding that breakand the radicalism that accompanied itcan we fully understand our current political situation.
The older progressive tradition primarily aimed to address the ills of industrial capitalism. Progressive reformers such as Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson sought strict regulations on business to protect the rights and health of workers and citizens and to deal with the problem of corporate monopoly. They proposed an associative order in which civic and business organizations cooperated with government at the municipal, state, and federal levels to promote the general welfare. In the 1930s, Franklin Roosevelts New Deal built on this reform tradition by providing a safety netold-age pensions, unemployment benefits, and welfare payments. Lyndon Johnsons Great Society went further in the 1960s, extending grants and loans to college students, establishing the Jobs Corps, creating Medicare and Medicaid, and declaring war on poverty. But this progressive tradition did not seek to dismantle capitalism itself. Even the New Deal, for all its statist sympathies, refused to nationalize banks or ailing industries during the worst global economic crisis in history.
The liberal agenda today is much more radical and encompassing. It is no coincidence that upon taking office, President Obama pushed for government control of nearly every aspect of American lifethrough nationalized health care, environmental regulation, caps on energy use, financial regulation, and a range of other governmental intrusions. The roots of this radicalism lie in a strategy that emerged in the 1960s and 1970s to challenge the American corporate order.
Infiltrating the Establishment
The New Left that came of age in the 1960s was not an extension of Roosevelt-Wilson progressive reform. Nor, for that matter, was it a continuation of New Deal or Great Society liberalism. Indeed, these activists denounced mainstream liberalism as the enemy of reform. Influenced by a rekindled interest in Marx, they saw the New Deal regulatory state as benefiting large corporations, and the New Deal welfare state as only an ameliorative measure designed to maintain class privilege. Where earlier progressives were concerned mostly with the failings of industrial capitalism, the new activists of the 1960s addressed the problems of a postindustrial order, which were related more to affluence than to scarcity. The range of concerns thus expanded beyond poverty and inequality to include corporate greed, toxic waste, unsafe consumer products, environmental abuse, overpopulation, and many other issues. These radicals disparaged consumption and corporate capitalism. They espoused what they called community control and direct democracy, though leaders of this movement generally came from elite backgrounds and aimed to impose their visions of social justice on the rest of society. This emergent Left was a new political phenomenon.
By the early 1970s, the New Lefts antiVietnam War protests and other street activism had faded away. But the radicalism remained. The activists simply changed their tactics for remaking American society. After fighting against the establishment, radical leaders discovered that they could achieve much more by working within the system. They learned to harness politics and the courts to pursue what they thought of as social justice. Becoming lawyers, professors, journalists, consumer advocates, union leaders, and even politicians, left-wing activists morphed into a new movementthe New Progressives.
This book examines how the New Progressives colonized many areas of American life in creative and powerful ways. They achieved their two most significant successes in rewriting the Democratic Partys presidential nominating rules and in remaking the legal profession. In the first case, New Progressive activists got their opportunity following the disastrous 1968 Democratic National Convention. Antiwar activists were outraged that Vice President Hubert Humphrey had won the Democratic nomination despite earning a small percentage of primary votes. The Democratic Party responded by appointing a commission, headed by antiwar senator George McGovern, to revise the partys process for selecting delegates. Reformers on the commissionespecially young staffers who came out of the antiwar movementquietly rewrote the rules to give much greater power to left-wing activists, including peace protesters, feminists, environmentalists, community organizers, homosexual-rights advocates, and ethnic-minority leaders. These rules changes have had long-term consequences for the Democratic Party, enshrining identity politics and pushing the party much further to the left. As this book will show, Barack Obama almost certainly could not have won the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination without the McGovern Commissions changes favoring progressive activists.
Still, New Progressives maintained an uneasy alliance with the Democratic Party. Left-wing activists wanted to radically transform American societyby pursuing militant environmentalism; tearing down corporate power; crusading for population control, abortion, and euthanasia; pushing for nationalized health insurance; and more. But electoral politics meant compromise, working with lobbying interests, and trusting politicians interested only in winning elections. Often, too, New Progressives found that voters did not embrace their radical agenda. They needed to find a way to impose their vision on the country. That is where the second notable achievement, in the field of law, proved so consequential.
New Progressive legal activists practically invented the field of public interest law. Growing out of the rights revolution of the 1960s and especially the anticorporate crusading of Ralph Nader, a left-wing legal movement took advantage of liability law and class-action suits to go after businesses, physicians, civic organizations, government agencies, and any number of other groups. By the mid-1970s, leading New Progressive legal thinkers had laid out the strategy for taking down corporations in the name of giving power to the people. One prescient essay outlined how class-action suits could be used to exact hundreds of billions of dollars from tobacco and liquor companies, the pharmaceutical industry, food manufacturers, and other groupsexactly what activist lawyers would do in the succeeding decades.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Takeover: How the Left’s Quest for Social Justice Corrupted Liberalism»

Look at similar books to Takeover: How the Left’s Quest for Social Justice Corrupted Liberalism. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Takeover: How the Left’s Quest for Social Justice Corrupted Liberalism»

Discussion, reviews of the book Takeover: How the Left’s Quest for Social Justice Corrupted Liberalism and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.