Table of Contents
Preface
This publication is a comprehensive, yet simplified study program. It provides a review of all the basic skills and concepts tested on the CPA exam, and teaches important strategies to take the exam faster and more accurately. This tool allows you to take control of the CPA exam.
This simplified and focused approach to studying for the CPA exam can be used:
As a handy and convenient reference manual
To solve exam questions
To reinforce material being studied
Included is all of the information necessary to obtain a passing score on the CPA exam in a concise and easy-to-use format. Due to the wide variety of information covered on the exam, a number of techniques are included:
Acronyms and mnemonics to help candidates learn and remember a variety of rules and checklists
Formulas and equations that simplify complex calculations required on the exam
Simplified outlines of key concepts without the details that encumber or distract from learning the essential elements
Techniques that can be applied to problem solving or essay writing, such as preparing a multiple-step income statement, determining who will prevail in a legal conflict, or developing an audit program
Pro forma statements, reports, and schedules that make it easy to prepare these items by simply filling in the blanks
Proven techniques to help you become a smarter, sharper, and more accurate test taker
This publication may also be useful to university students enrolled in Intermediate, Advanced and Cost Accounting; Auditing, Business Law, and Federal Income Tax classes; Economics, and Finance classes.
Good Luck on the Exam,
Kevin Stevens, DBA, CPA
About the Authors
Kevin Stevens, DBA, CPA, is the director of the School of Accountancy and Management Information Systems at DePaul University. He is a full professor of accountancy and is a registered certified public account in Illinois. He has taught for many years in DePauls CPA review program and at both the graduate and undergraduate levels. He holds a doctoral degree in business administration (accountancy) from the University of Kentucky, a masters in taxation from DePaul, a masters in accounting from the University of Illinois at Urbana and a bachelors degree in Political Science from Loyola University, Chicago.
Corporate Governance and Enterprise Risk Management
Corporate Governance: Establish Incentives and Monitoring
Owners separate from management
Agency problem: Will managers act in owners interest?
Incentives to defeat agency problem
Forms of Executive CompensationBase salary and profit: usually based on accounting measure
May lead to earnings manipulation or management
Stock options: align shareholders and managers interest in increasing share prices
Differences in timing horizons (management short-term?)
Underwater options provide no incentive
Restricted stock: force managers to think long-term
Monitoring DevicesBoards of directors
Independent nominating/corporate governance committee
Independent audit committee (AC) under Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX)
At least one financial expert
External auditors must report directly to AC
AC appoints, determines compensation, and oversees external auditor
Listed companies
Majority independent directors
Provide information to investors as to who is independent
Have and make available code of conduct
Have an independent AC
Internal auditors
Provide assurance on risk management and internal control
Should report to AC
Independent and competent
Chief IC officer report directly to CEO
External auditors
Help assure users that financials are accurate and not fraudulent
Must attest to managements assessment of effective internal control as required by SOX
SEC and SOX
CEO and CFO certify accuracy and truthfulness with criminal penalties
Fraud in sale or purchase of securities punishable by fine and/or prison
Destruction or other damage to documentation to hinder investigation punishable by fine and/or prison
Retaliation on whistle-blowers punishable by fine and/or prison
Internal Controls
COS): Internal Control Integrated Framework1. Control environment
a. Integrity and ethical values (tone at the top)
b. Competence
c. Effective BOD or AC
d. Management philosophy operating style
e. Effective organizational structure
f. Clear assignment of authority and responsibility
g. Effective human resource policies (e.g., training)
2. Control activities
a. Performance reviews
b. Segregation of duties, IT controls
c. Physical controls (e.g. over inventory)
3. Information and communication
a. Employees understand role and responsibilities
b. Capture information on a timely basis
4. Monitoring of controls: Are they working?
Enterprise Risk Management: Eight Components
1. Internal environment (tone of the organization)
a. Effective board
b. Ethical management
c. Risk appetite: How much risk is organization willing to accept to achieve a goal?
d. Risk tolerance: how far above or below meeting objective is allowable?
2. Objective setting
a. Well-defined mission
b. Process to set objectives that align with goals
3. Event identification
a. Internal
1. Loss of key personnel
2. Damage to infrastructure (e.g., IS crash)
3. Key product/process becomes obsolete
b. External
1. Establish Trigger points (e.g., competition increases market share above x amount)
2. Process to assess demographic and economic changes
c. Black swan analysis: Evaluate negative events that were unforeseen to determine why
4. Risk assessment: what are the risks?
a. Inherent risk: what if management does nothing in response to identified risk?
b. Residual risk: residual after managements response
5. Risk responses
a. Avoidance
b. Reduction
c. Sharing
d. Acceptance
6. Control activities: policies and procedures to insure that risk responses are implemented
7. Information and communication throughout organization
a. Organizations objectives
b. Risk appetite and tolerance
c. Role of ERM in managing risk
8. Monitoring: Effective process to oversee ERM
Enterprise Risk Management: Limitations
1. The future is uncertain
2. No absolute assurances
a. Human failure
b. System breakdown
c. Collusion across ERM
d. Management override
Information Technology
Attributes of Paper vs Electronic Systems
Difficulty of alteration It is easier to change electronic data without detection