• Complain

Gökten Huriye Dogangün - Gender Politics in Turkey and Russia: From State Feminism to Authoritarian Rule

Here you can read online Gökten Huriye Dogangün - Gender Politics in Turkey and Russia: From State Feminism to Authoritarian Rule full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: London, year: 2019, publisher: I.B. Tauris, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Gökten Huriye Dogangün Gender Politics in Turkey and Russia: From State Feminism to Authoritarian Rule
  • Book:
    Gender Politics in Turkey and Russia: From State Feminism to Authoritarian Rule
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    I.B. Tauris
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2019
  • City:
    London
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Gender Politics in Turkey and Russia: From State Feminism to Authoritarian Rule: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Gender Politics in Turkey and Russia: From State Feminism to Authoritarian Rule" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Both Russia and Turkey were pioneering examples of feminism in the early 20th Century, when the Bolshevik and Republican states embraced an ideology of womens equality. Yet now these countries have drifted towards authoritarianism and the concept of gender is being invoked to reinforce tradition, nationalism and to oppose Western culture. Gkten Dogangns book explores the relationship between the state and gender equality in Russia and Turkey, covering the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 and the Republican Revolution of 1923 and highlighting the very different gender climates that have emerged under the leaderships of Putin and Erdogan.
The research is based on analysis of legal documents, statistical data and reports, as well as in-depth interviews with experts, activists and public officials. Dogangn identifies a climate of neo-traditionalism in contemporary Russia and neo-conservatism in contemporary Turkey and examines how Putin and Erdogans ambitions to ensure political stability, security and legitimacy are achieved by promoting commonly held family values, grounded in religion and tradition. The book reveals what it means to be a woman in Turkey and Russia today and covers key topics such as hostility towards feminism, womens employment, domestic violence, motherhood and abortion. Dogangn provides the first comparative study that seeks to understand the escalation of patriarchy and the decline of democracy which is being witnessed across the world.

Gökten Huriye Dogangün: author's other books


Who wrote Gender Politics in Turkey and Russia: From State Feminism to Authoritarian Rule? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Gender Politics in Turkey and Russia: From State Feminism to Authoritarian Rule — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Gender Politics in Turkey and Russia: From State Feminism to Authoritarian Rule" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Gender Politics in Turkey and Russia
Gender Politics in Turkey and Russia
From State Feminism to Authoritarian Rule
Huriye Gkten Doangn
To Bahadr my beloved brother AKP Justice and Development Party ANNA - photo 1
To Bahadr, my beloved brother
AKPJustice and Development Party
ANNANational Centre of Domestic Violence
CEDAWConvention of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women
CPSUCommunist Party of the Soviet Union
EGIDASociety for Promoting the Social Protection of Citizens
EUEuropean Union
Ka-DerAssociation for the Support and Training of Women Candidates
KSGMGeneral Directorate of Womens Status
KSSGMGeneral Directorate of Womens Status and Problems
NGONon-Governmental Organization
NMViolence Prevention and Monitoring Centres
UNUnited Nations
UNDPUnited Nations Development Programme
UNESCOUnited Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
UNFPAUnited Nations Population Fund
USSRUnion of Soviet Socialist Republic
My first encounter with the issue of gender equality in Russia took place when I went to Russia as an Erasmus exchange student to learn Russian. I was astonished to realize how Russian and Turkish women have similar problems despite these two countries having different cultural traditions and historical pasts. This experience drove me to think comparatively about the situation of gender equality in Russia and Turkey. In 2010, I had a chance to share and discuss my observations with significant scholars, whose fields of interest are gender in Russia and Russian politics at Michigan State University (MSU) in the United States, where I spent four months as a visiting scholar. Then, I decided to undertake comparative research on gender equality and examine the implications of the wider political context on womens equality, starting from the experience of state feminism in Russia and Turkey. At MSU, I carried out preliminary preparation, including a literature review and informal discussions with these scholars on developing my aim and arguments.
By the time I started my comparative research on gender equality in Russia and Turkey in 2010, there were gradual signs of authoritarianism and of a patriarchal revival (traditional values). The data pointing to the restoration of patriarchal gender order had not yet emerged. In the literature, the debate was gradually emerging but no one was quite sure. Something was changing but no one wanted to make strong claims. It was my observation/intuition that gradually emerging authoritarianism would have serious effects on gender equality. Unfortunately, I was not wrong and numerous data started to emerge while I was doing the literature review, collecting, analysing and writing empirical data, and even after finishing my research.
As the literature was already emerging, I decided to conduct expert interviews with the aim of acquiring an inside-out approach to examining the shift and its direction. Expert interviews have gained widespread acceptance in qualitative social research as a legitimate method of exploring and gathering information at the initial phase of research (see Bogner and Menz, 2009). As Meuser and Nagel propose, special knowledge, acquired through not only training and professional roles but also through privileged access to information granted by activity and possession of local knowledge embedded in the experts milieu, is the subject matter of the expert interview (2009, p.24). Expert interviews help researchers obtain useful information and elucidation of the issues under investigation (Bogner and Menz, 2009, p.47). I deeply utilized in-depth expert interviews to acquire academic and personal insights and observations about a newly emerging social reality. This field research was conducted with the financial support of the Middle East Technical University. A year that I spent at the Centre for Middle Eastern Studies at Harvard University as a visiting scholar also provided me with particular opportunities, including participating in numerous seminars about my research topic, meeting important scholars in the same field, using library facilities and presenting my research at different academic venues and collecting feedback, to enlarge my research and convert it into a book manuscript.
I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor and chair Professor Dr Aye Ayata for her guidance, advice, criticism, encouragement and insight throughout the research.
I would like to show my gratitude to Sophie Rudland from I.B. Tauris, who supported me from the very beginning for this production and shared her valuable comments at every stage of writing this book. I would also like to express my sincere thanks to anonymous referees for their important and contributory suggestions and comments.
I am also deeply indebted to my family Mjgan, Asm, and Bahadr who have always believed in and unconditionally supported my efforts during the whole of my academic life. Without their patience and, most valuably, their never-ending care and encouragement, blended with their love, this study could hardly have been realized.
This book could not be written without the unconditional support and help of my KORAcans, Yelda, Zelal, Sezin and Gzde, and Asuman. Their academic contribution and emotional support made this long journey easier and tolerable. They did not deny their patience and encouragement at each step. I owe my deepest love to them. Dear Olga and Gzel lent me a hand with translation and with doing research in Russian. With their help, my research was enriched. Finally, I owe my thanks to all the interviewees, who kindly agreed to give me an interview and contributed to my research.
In 1993, Huntington put forward a controversial thesis that the cultural and religious divisions between the different civilizations of the West and the rest of the world would be the new fault line for conflict in the post-Cold War period (Huntington, 1993). The clash of civilizations would be the main replacement of the ideological and economic sources of conflict that had constituted the core of the struggle between the two superpowers in the Cold War period. Huntingtons predictions are only half right, because his work dealt extensively with Islam and the Muslim world as the prospective competitor of Western civilization. He was right in foreseeing that the efforts of the West to promote its values of democracy and liberalism as universal values, to maintain its military predominance and to advance its economic interests engender countering responses from other civilizations, but he was mistaken in assuming that the reaction would come mainly from the Muslim world (p.29). It has recently been hybrid regimes, whether or not they are Muslim, which establish formal democratic institutions but fail to consolidate democratic norms and values, that compete with Western civilization. According to the latest Freedom House Survey (2018), in 2017 democracy was facing its most serious crisis in decades. The number of partly free countries had increased by 2017 from 33 to 63 while the number of unfree countries had risen from 42 in 1998 to 57 in 2017 (Freedom House Survey, 1998, 2018). These results show that the basic tenets of democracy, including the rule of law, free and fair elections, freedom of the press and of assembly, and the rights of minorities, are under serious attack in the world.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Gender Politics in Turkey and Russia: From State Feminism to Authoritarian Rule»

Look at similar books to Gender Politics in Turkey and Russia: From State Feminism to Authoritarian Rule. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Gender Politics in Turkey and Russia: From State Feminism to Authoritarian Rule»

Discussion, reviews of the book Gender Politics in Turkey and Russia: From State Feminism to Authoritarian Rule and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.