Captivating History - Korean War: A Captivating Guide to Korean War History

Copyright 2017 by Captivating History

All rights Reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the author. Reviewers may quote brief passages in reviews.

Disclaimer: No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical or electronic, including photocopying or recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, or transmitted by email without permission in writing from the publisher.

While all attempts have been made to verify the information provided in this publication, neither the author nor the publisher assumes any responsibility for errors, omissions or contrary interpretations of the subject matter herein.

This book is for entertainment purposes only. The views expressed are those of the author alone, and should not be taken as expert instruction or commands. The reader is responsible for his or her own actions.

Adherence to all applicable laws and regulations, including international, federal, state and local laws governing professional licensing, business practices, advertising and all other aspects of doing business in the US, Canada, UK or any other jurisdiction is the sole responsibility of the purchaser or reader.

Neither the author nor the publisher assumes any responsibility or liability whatsoever on the behalf of the purchaser or reader of these materials. Any perceived slight of any individual or organization is purely unintentional.

Introduction

T he narrative of the Korean War in the West, and particularly in the United States, tells the tale of a conflict between two global superpowers and competing ideologies in a far-flung corner of the globe.

The reality is that the wheels of motion that drove the country to war in 1950 began turning long before American boots set foot on Korean soil. The heart of the conflict was a civil war between a population arbitrarily divided by colonization and the global geopolitics at the end of the Second World War.

Challenging the widely perpetuated Western narrative and getting to the core of the Korean conflict is no easy feat. From assumptions that the outbreak of war was a deliberate act of communist aggression, to the notion that Eisenhower and Trumans constant threats of atomic annihilation broke the Chinese and North Korean spirit and led to the signing of the armistice, everything needs to be dissected and reviewed on its own factual merit to fully understand the nature of the war.

This guide seeks to pull this narrative curtain and peek behind at the truth of the matter, tracing the history of the war back to the Japanese occupation and uncovering the root of Korean nationalism that stirred the nation into the frenzy of civil war in 1950.

It is about an often-forgotten war, fighting for its place in history between the two behemoths of the Second World War and the Vietnam War, which was no less significant, no less destructive, and had no less impact on the global politics of the twentieth century.

Chapter 1 The Japanese Ascendency: 1910-1945

T he chain of events that brought the Korean peninsula to the outbreak of war in 1950 can be traced back to almost half a century before, at the beginning of the Japanese occupation of the country. The Korean nation, with a shared culture, language, ethnicity and heritage, deteriorated from harmonious social cohesion to a bloody civil war in just 40 years. The scars of the conflict are still etched on the Korean political landscape today. The North has a reclusive communist government, while the South has flourished as a democratic republic.

To understand the rapid deterioration and ultimate segregation of the peninsula, we must examine the conditions of the Japanese occupation of the country. Koreans under Japanese rule were a systematically divided and oppressed population. They saw their culture suppressed and their workforce mobilized to feed Japanese mouths and drive the Japanese war machine. But the period also gave birth to the Korean independence movement and began to shape Korean nationalism. Nationalist ideas would begin to be formed, both within Korea itself, across the Yalu River in China, and within the Soviet Union by those in exile. These same ideas which were bred under Japanese rule are those that gave the peninsula the political divide we can still see today.

The Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty of 1910

After formally becoming a Japanese protectorate in 1905 and handing over control of administrative affairs to the Japanese in 1907, Japanese Resident General Count Terauchi Masatake drew up the Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty in 1910, to formally transfer the governance of Korea to the Emperor of Japan. When presented with the treaty, Emperor Sunjong of Korea had no intention of signing it. But, with the ominous threat of Japanese invasion looming if he didnt, he reluctantly placed his national seal of the Korean Empire on the treaty and, rather than sign it himself, presented Prime Minister Lee Wan-yong with the document to sign [i] .

Sunjong faced the dilemma of either signing the document and accepting Japanese rule, or resist and be taken by force, which would undoubtedly have left many casualties and led to a more submissive relationship under the Japanese government. The fact the Emperor himself didnt actually sign the document, and the conditions of duress that the document was presented under, has led many subsequent governments of both South and North Korea to question the legality of the treaty.

Life under Japanese rule

Despite the Emperors seal, the Koreans were treated as conquered people. The Japanese implemented their version of military rule, known as budan seiji [ii] . The military and police extended their control into every aspect of Korean life. Koreans were not allowed to publish their own newspapers or organize their own political groups [iii] , nor were they included in high levels of government administration. Korean land was frequently confiscated by the Japanese and redistributed.

Economically, the Japanese implemented a system of protectionist capitalism. They used Korean labor to drive Japanese industries. Koreans found themselves working in Japanese-owned firms. Any profits were sent back to Japan [iv] and only a very small and select group of Korean elites became successful under Japanese rule. In 1942, Korean entrepreneurs owned just 1.5% of the total capital invested in Korean industries and they were charged interest rates up to 25% higher than their Japanese counterparts [v] . These conditions made it impossible for the Korean working class to improve their lot and eroded the wealth of the already established middle class.