• Complain

Bradley Campbell - The Geometry of Genocide: A Study in Pure Sociology

Here you can read online Bradley Campbell - The Geometry of Genocide: A Study in Pure Sociology full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2015, publisher: University of Virginia Press, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    The Geometry of Genocide: A Study in Pure Sociology
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    University of Virginia Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2015
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Geometry of Genocide: A Study in Pure Sociology: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Geometry of Genocide: A Study in Pure Sociology" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

In The Geometry of Genocide, Bradley Campbell argues that genocide is best understood not as deviant behavior but as social controla response to perceived deviant behavior on the part of victims. Using Donald Blacks method of pure sociology, Campbell considers genocide in relation to three features of social life: diversity, inequality, and intimacy. According to this theory, genocidal conflicts begin with changes in diversity and inequality, such as when two previously separated ethnic groups come into contact, or when a subordinate ethnic group attempts to rise in status. Further, conflicts are more likely to result in genocide when they occur in a context of social distance and inequality and when aggressors and victims cannot be easily separated.


Campbell applies his approach to five cases: the killings of American Indians in 1850s California, Muslims in 2002 India and 1992 Bosnia, Tutsis in 1994 Rwanda, and Jews in 1940s Europe. These case studies, which focus in detail on particular incidents within each instance of genocide, demonstrate the theorys ability to explain an array of factors, including why genocide occurs and who participates. Campbells theory uniquely connects the study of genocide to the larger study of conflict and social control. By situating genocide among these broader phenomena, The Geometry of Genocide provides a novel and compelling explanation of genocide, while furthering our understanding of why humans have conflicts and why they respond to conflict as they do.

Bradley Campbell: author's other books


Who wrote The Geometry of Genocide: A Study in Pure Sociology? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Geometry of Genocide: A Study in Pure Sociology — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Geometry of Genocide: A Study in Pure Sociology" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
University of Virginia Press 2015 by the Rector and Visitors of the University - photo 1
University of Virginia Press
2015 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
All rights reserved
Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper
First published 2015
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Campbell, Bradley Keith.
The geometry of genocide : a study in pure sociology / Bradley Campbell.
pages cm. (Studies in pure sociology)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-8139-3741-0 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-8139-3742-7 (e-book)
1. Genocide. 2. Social control. I. Title.
HV6322.7.C336 2015
304.663dc23
2015019372
IN MEMORY OF MY FATHER,
AND FOR MY MOTHER
PREFACE
The American Civil War general William T. Sherman rightly said that war is hell. But if war is hell, what is genocide? War and genocide have similar horrorsblood, guts, and gore (Snyder 2014)but for most of us genocide seems worse. We might appreciate the virtues of the loyal soldier fighting for his country, even in an unjust war, but what of those whose enemies are children and civilians rather than other armed fighters? What of those who shoot unarmed people in the backs of their heads as they lie helplessly in ditches and then pile more victims on top of them? What of the gas chambers?
We see in genocide an evil so starkbeyond even the hellishness of warfarethat we may want to look away. As political scientist and genocide scholar Adam Jones notes, those of us who study genocide will often hear, after telling someone about our work, some version of Why would you want to study that? (2006:xviii). I have heard it, and I can sympathize. Why try to understand something like genocide? Why disturb ones mind with those images? But since you, the reader, have now opened up a book on genocide, maybe you find as I do that you do not wish to look awayor cannot. Maybe you believe that good will result from better knowledge of genocide. Maybe you sense that otherwise you would fail to understand something significant about reality.
So we try to explain genocide, but how? In the traditional formulation, evil comes from the world, the flesh, and the Devil. The theologian might study the Devil and the psychologist the flesh, but as a sociologist I study the worldhuman society. Examining genocide sociologically means identifying its social influences and the social context in which it occurs. Sociologists have various ways of doing this, though, and many are interested in the interactions between the social and psychological levels of reality. For example, they might examine how society shapes individuals. They might thus identify how culture, early childhood socialization, or some other societal feature motivates people to plan or participate in genocide. Another tack is to examine how individuals shape society. One way of doing this is to look at human behavior as resulting from individuals making the choices that most benefit themselves. Sociologists might thus show how the decision to engage in genocide benefits political actors in specific circumstances. We may learn a great deal from these and other approaches, but notice that each one focuses on some things and puts others to the side. Any coherent theory must do this, as does my own. The approach I use, called pure sociology, focuses exclusively on the social, leaving psychological and other individualistic factors out entirely.
I say more about pure sociology in chapter 1, but for now I simply ask you to keep an open mind. It might seem weird or even crazy to try to explain any behaviormuch less extreme evil like genocidewithout reference to the character or minds of those engaging in it. But I invite you to consider, even if you believe we must be losing something important by stripping away all but the social factors, that doing so might also reveal things about genocide that other approaches obscure.
Another thing that might seem weird or crazy is that I do not deal here with the morality of genocide. Genocide concerns usit concerns meprecisely because of our moral reaction to it. We want to better understand these events that shock our consciences and leave us so confused. Yet our judgments of genocide do little to help us explain it scientifically, so the evil of genocide is another aspect of it that I put to the side. I shall discuss the reasons for this in more detail, but for now consider that most of those planning and carrying out genocide have not set out to do evil. On the contrary, they see themselves as meting out justice, protecting their communities from danger, or otherwise engaging in morally upright behavior. For them genocide is a way which seemeth right (Proverbs 14:12). This is an idea we might resist. If people can in good conscience engage in great evil, how can we be confident we are not similarly mistaken about our own beliefs and behaviors? But we must face such matters squarely if we are to make progress in understanding them.
I am grateful to those of you, the readers, who are willing to look more closely with me at this difficult subject, and to look at it in an unfamiliar way. I am also grateful to all who have helped with this book, directly by reading drafts and giving advice and indirectly by shaping my intellectual development. My first exposure to sociology was as an undergraduate at Lee University, in an introductory course taught by Karen Mundy in the spring of 1993, when I was just seventeen years old. Sociologists were interested in the things I was interested in, it seemed, and a year later I changed my major from accounting to sociology, though I had little idea of what I might end up doing. Eventually I went to Clemson University for a masters, and I am grateful to William Wentworth, James Hawdon, and John Ryanthe members of my thesis committee therefor supporting me in various ways, including by prodding me to go to a Ph.D. program. Their help, along with that of Brenda Vander Mey, who employed me as a research assistant, was generous and efficacious.
I began my work on genocide in the sociology department at the University of Virginia, and I thank the members of my doctoral dissertation committeeDonald Black, Jeffrey Olick, Milton Vickerman, and outside readers Elizabeth Arkush and Roberta Senechal de la Rochefor all of their help. I especially thank Donald Black, my dissertation advisor, who has done more to shape this book than anyone else. I knew little of his work until the first day of his Sociology of Law seminar in the fall of 2000, my first semester at the University of Virginia. He began that day by writing on the board, Law varies directly with relational distance, and I was amazed to find out that this formulation applies cross-culturally and cross-historicallythat it can explain facts as seemingly unconnected as the absence of law in hunter-gather societies and the variability in the application of the death penalty in the modern United States. I have been hooked on pure sociology ever since. Since then he has helped me in countless ways throughout my career and on this project, including by giving detailed feedback first on my dissertation and later on two earlier drafts of this book.
Elsewhere I have encouraged sociologists to think more about their vocation and to treat their work with moral seriousness (Campbell 2014a:451; 2014b:7). I know of no sociologist who does so more than Donald Black. He is an exemplar of vocational integrityan idealist fearlessly and joyfully pursuing the scientific study of social life. And it is infectious. After nearly every conversation with him, I come away resolved to be a better sociologist.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Geometry of Genocide: A Study in Pure Sociology»

Look at similar books to The Geometry of Genocide: A Study in Pure Sociology. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Geometry of Genocide: A Study in Pure Sociology»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Geometry of Genocide: A Study in Pure Sociology and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.