ONE NATION UNDER SURVEILLANCE
One Nation Under Surveillance
A New Social Contract to Defend Freedom Without Sacrificing Liberty
SIMON CHESTERMAN
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the Universitys objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide in
Oxford New York
Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi
Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi
New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto
With offices in
Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece
Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore
South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam
Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press
in the UK and in certain other countries
Published in the United States
by Oxford University Press Inc., New York
Simon Chesterman 2011
The moral rights of the author have been asserted
Database right Oxford University Press (maker)
First published 2011
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means,
without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press,
or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate
reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction
outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department,
Oxford University Press, at the address above
You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover
and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
Data available
Typeset by SPI Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India
Printed in Great Britain
on acid-free paper by
Clays Ltd, St Ives plc
ISBN 9780199580378
1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2
Was he free? Was he happy? The question is absurd;
Had anything been wrong, we should certainly have heard.
WH Auden, The Unknown Citizen
Acknowledgements
The nature of this research calls for some measure of discretion. In 1998, the Washington Times reported that US intelligence services were able to monitor Osama bin Ladens satellite phone. A CIA agent later argued that bin Laden stopped using the phone because of the story, and that a causal link joined the decision to publish to the September 11 attacks on the United States. As I suggest in Chapter three, the account somewhat exaggerates this particular incident, but one must accept that the subject matter is sensitive. For present purposes, it is sufficient to note that certain details of past and current operations will be glossed over and that most interviews were on a not-for-attribution or off-the-record basis and thus will not be identified. Since the book is primarily forward-looking, it is hoped that this will not unduly distort either analysis or prose.
I am, nonetheless, extremely grateful to the many current and past practitioners who were kind enough to share their time and their insights with me in New York, Washington, DC, London, Ottawa, Canberra, Singapore, and elsewhere. In addition, I received valuable comments on various parts of the text from William Abresch, Rueban Balasubramaniam, Gary Bell, Curtis Bradley, Tom Donnelly, Michael Dowdle, Michael Ewing-Chow, Trevor Findlay, Adrian Friedman, Michael Fullilove, Richard Goldstone, Allan Gyngell, Stephen Humphreys, David Jordan, Liliana Jubilut, Richard Junnier, Benedict Kingsbury, Chia Lehnardt, Lim Yee Fen, Karin Loevy, David Malone, Madan Mohan, Paul Monk, Muhammad Aidil Bin Zulkifli, Roland Paris, Sharanjeet Parmar, Joost Pauwelyn, Danielle Louise Pereira, Priya Pillai, Victor Ramraj, Lakshmi Ravindran, David Tan, Tan Hsien-Li, Patricia Tan Shuming, Tan Teck Boon, Teo Yu Chou, Laura Thomas, and Ludwig Ureel. Errors, omissions, and violations of Official Secrets Acts are the responsibility of the author alone.
Thanks also to the many students from New York University School of Law and the National University of Singapore who have participated in the Intelligence Law seminar that I have taught for the past few years. Their insights and their questions frequently helped shape my own views on this topic.
The book develops certain ideas first published elsewhere. These earlier works include Shared Secrets: Intelligence and Collective Security (Sydney: Lowy Institute for International Policy, 2006); The Spy Who Came In from the Cold War: Intelligence and International Law, Michigan Journal of International Law 27 (2006) 1071; Secrets and Lies: Intelligence Activities and the Rule of Law in Times of Crisis, Michigan Journal of International Law 28 (2007) 553; We Cant Spy If We Cant Buy!: The Privatization of US Intelligence Services, European Journal of International Law 19 (2008) 1055; I Spy, Survival 50(3) (2008) 163; Deny Everything: Intelligence Activities and the Rule of Law, in Victor V Ramraj (ed), Emergencies and the Limits of Legality (Cambridge University Press, 2008) 314; Secret Intelligence, in Rdiger Wolfrum (ed), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2009); and Intelligence Cooperation in International Operations: Peacekeeping, Weapons Inspections, and the Apprehension and Prosecution of War Criminals, in Hans Born, Ian Leigh, and Aidan Wills (eds), International Intelligence Cooperation and Accountability (Routledge, forthcoming). Permission to reproduce the relevant passages is gratefully acknowledged.
My final thanks go to Ming and our family, for showing me what is really worth watching closely.
Contents
Abbreviations
ANZUS | Australia, New Zealand, and the United States Security Treaty |
ASIO | Australian Security Intelligence Organisation |
ASIS | Australian Secret Intelligence Service |
CCTV | closed-circuit television |
CIA | Central Intelligence Agency (US) |
CIFA | Counterintelligence Field Activity (US) |
CSEC | Communications Security Establishment Canada |
CSIS | Canadian Security Intelligence Service |
CTC | Counterterrorist Center (US) |
DIA | Defense Intelligence Agency (US) |
DSD | Defence Signals Directorate (Australia) |
EISAS | Executive Committee on Peace and Security Information and Strategic Analysis Secretariat (UN) |
FBI | Federal Bureau of Investigation (US) |
FISA | Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (US) |
FOIA | Freedom of Information Act (US) |
FISC | Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (US) |
Next page