• Complain

Fox-Decent - Sovereigntys promise : the state as fiduciary

Here you can read online Fox-Decent - Sovereigntys promise : the state as fiduciary full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: New York, Oxford, year: 2011, publisher: OUP Oxford, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Sovereigntys promise : the state as fiduciary
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    OUP Oxford
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2011
  • City:
    New York, Oxford
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Sovereigntys promise : the state as fiduciary: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Sovereigntys promise : the state as fiduciary" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Constitutional theory is traditionally concerned with the justification and limits of state power. It asks: Can states legitimately direct and coerce non-consenting subjects? If they can, what limits, if any, constrain sovereign power?
Public law is concerned with the justification and limits of judicial power. It asks: On what grounds can judges read down or read in statutory language against the apparent intention of the legislature? What limits, if any, are appropriate to these exercises of judicial power?
This book develops an original fiduciary theory of political authority that yields novel answers to both sets of questions. Fox-Decent argues that the state is a fiduciary of its people, and that this fiduciary relationship grounds the states authority to announce and enforce law. The fiduciary state is conceived of as a public agent of necessity charged with guaranteeing a regime of secure and equal freedom. Whereas the social contract tradition struggles to ground authority on consent, the fiduciary theory explains authority with reference to the states fiduciary obligation to respect legal principles constitutive of the rule of law and responsive to public powers indifference to consent.
The author begins with a discussion of Hobbess conception of legality and the problem of discretionary power in administrative law. Drawing on Kant, he then sketches a theory of fiduciary relations, and develops the argument through three parts. Part I shows that it is possible for the state to stand in a public fiduciary relationship to its people through a discussion of Crown-Native fiduciary relations recognised by Canadian courts. Part II sets out the theoretical underpinnings of the fiduciary theory of the state. Part III explores the implications of the fiduciary theory for administrative law and common law constitutionalism, and in the final chapter situates the theory within a broader philosophical discussion of the rule of law

Fox-Decent: author's other books


Who wrote Sovereigntys promise : the state as fiduciary? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Sovereigntys promise : the state as fiduciary — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Sovereigntys promise : the state as fiduciary" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

OXFORD CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY

Series Editors

Martin Loughlin, John P McCormick, and Neil Walker

Sovereigntys Promise

OXFORD CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY

Series Editors:

Martin Loughlin, John P. McCormick, and Neil Walker

One consequence of the increase in interest in constitutions and constitutional law in recent years is a growing innovative literature in constitutional theory. The aim of Oxford Constitutional Theory is to provide a showcase for the best of these theoretical reflections and a forum for further innovation in the field.

The new series will seek to establish itself as the primary point of reference for scholarly work in the subject by commissioning different types of study. The majority of the works published in the series will be monographs that advance new understandings of the subject. Well-conceived edited collections that bring a variety of perspectives and disciplinary approaches to bear on specific themes in constitutional thought will also be included. Further, in recognition of the fact that there is a great deal of pioneering literature originally written in languages other than English and with regard to non-anglophone constitutional traditions, the series will also seek to publish English translations of leading monographs in constitutional theory.

Sovereigntys Promise

The State as Fiduciary

Evan Fox-Decent

McGill University

Great Clarendon Street Oxford OX2 6DP Oxford University Press is a department - photo 1

Great Clarendon Street Oxford OX2 6DP Oxford University Press is a department - photo 2

Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.

It furthers the Universitys objective of excellence in research, scholarship,

and education by publishing worldwide in

Oxford New York

Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi

Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi

New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto

With offices in

Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece

Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore

South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam

Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press

in the UK and in certain other countries

Published in the United States

by Oxford University Press Inc., New York

E. Fox-Decent, 2011

The moral rights of the author have been asserted

Database right Oxford University Press (maker)

Crown copyright material is reproduced under Class Licence

Number C01P0000148 with the permission of OPSI

and the Queens Printer for Scotland

First published 2011

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,

stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means,

without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press,

or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate

reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction

outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department,

Oxford University Press, at the address above

You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover

and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer

British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data

Data available

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data

Library of Congress Control Number: 2011939971

Typeset by SPI Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India

Printed in Great Britain

on acid-free paper by

CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY

ISBN 9780199698318

1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2

for my parents Wally and Joan Fox-Decent

Acknowledgements

This book began as a PhD dissertation written at the University of Toronto while I was in its joint JD/PhD (philosophy) programme. Special and heartfelt thanks go to my supervisor, David Dyzenhaus. Even while on sabbatical in New Zealand, he remained in touch and encouraged me to persevere and deal with the thickets of detail that frequently obscured the idea. He read countless drafts of earlier versions of most of the chapters produced here, providing insightful and constructive suggestions within days (sometimes within the same day) of having received the latest bit. A student could not have a more dedicated and capable supervisor. What is more, although the thesis was defended in 2003, he has since offered equally generous comments on sections of the book that have been updated to take account of more recent developments in administrative law.

I am also very grateful for the assistance I received from the readers on my committee, Arthur Ripstein and Lorne Sossin. Their comments were invaluable, and always forthcoming, especially in the final days leading up to submission, when I made numerous unreasonable calls on their time to review successive drafts and discuss ideas. They, too, have since given me generous comments on subsequent work towards this book.

I owe a similar debt to several colleagues at McGill Universitys Faculty of Law: Helge Dedek, Richard Janda, Robert Leckey, Rod Macdonald, Frderic Mgrt, Victor Muiz-Fratecelli, Lionel Smith, and Steve Smith. I would also like to thank many others for encouragement, discussion, and comments, including, Daniel Brudney, Evan Criddle, Wally Fox-Decent, Dennis Klimchuk, Matthias Mahlmann, Margaret Martin, Colleen Murphy, Sean Rehaag, Robert Shaver, Kaveh Shojania, Malcolm Thorburn, Mark Walters, and Raquel Yrigoyen Fajardo.

Various portions of the book were presented and discussed at a number of conferences: the Lon Fuller and Contemporary Legal Controversies two-part conference held at the law faculties of McGill University and the University of Toronto (2005); the Young Scholars Conference held at the Faculty of Law of McGill University (2008); the Dunsmuir Roundtable held at the Faculty of Law of the University of Toronto (2008); and a 2008 session of the McGill Political Theory Workshop. My thanks go to the organizers and participants.

Special thanks are also due to a teacher, Johnston Smith, from St Pauls High School in Winnipeg. While he did not did participate directly in this project, he sparked my interest in political philosophy, leading me to adopt a sceptical view of state authority.

I also owe a debt to several students who provided research assistance above and beyond the call of duty: Paul Clark, Matt Finn, Anthony Guindon, Carlos Ivn Fuentes, and Nelcy Lpez Cullar.

Two former students, Stefan Szpadja and Robert Whillans, merit thanks for reading through the manuscript cover-to-cover during the final revisions stage and providing innumerable helpful comments in every chapter. Robert, in fact, did this twice over, under unreasonable time constraints, and also took on the laborious task of converting the notes to a modern, uniform style.

This book would not have been possible but for the support of the Faculty of Law and the Department of Philosophy of University of Toronto while I was completing a JD and later writing my doctoral thesis. In addition to my committee, Brian Langille in Law and Joyce Wright in Philosophy were especially supportive. McGills Faculty of Law has since become my academic home. It has been an especially fertile and collegial setting for interdisciplinary research, in large part due to the leadership of its former Dean (now Justice) Nicholas Kasirer and its present Dean Daniel Jutras. Also, I would like to thank the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada for financial support throughout my doctoral and post-doctoral studies, as well as during the latter stages of the project.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Sovereigntys promise : the state as fiduciary»

Look at similar books to Sovereigntys promise : the state as fiduciary. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Sovereigntys promise : the state as fiduciary»

Discussion, reviews of the book Sovereigntys promise : the state as fiduciary and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.