• Complain

William G. Mayer - In Pursuit of the White House 2000: How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees

Here you can read online William G. Mayer - In Pursuit of the White House 2000: How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2000, publisher: Chatham House Publishers, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    In Pursuit of the White House 2000: How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Chatham House Publishers
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2000
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

In Pursuit of the White House 2000: How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "In Pursuit of the White House 2000: How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

In this guide to the major aspects of the US presidential nominating system, a team of experts looks at the background and evolution of the process and the new rules for 2000. It presents non-technical discussion of such topics as: the New Hampshire primary; the role of women in the nomination process; televised candidate debates; the role of consultants; the challenge of maintaining interparty unity; and the role of the vice-presidency.

William G. Mayer: author's other books


Who wrote In Pursuit of the White House 2000: How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

In Pursuit of the White House 2000: How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "In Pursuit of the White House 2000: How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
title author publisher isbn10 asin - photo 1

title:
author:
publisher:
isbn10 | asin:
print isbn13:
ebook isbn13:
language:
subject
publication date:
lcc:
ddc:
subject:
Page iii
In Pursuit of the White House 2000:
How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees
Edited by
William G. Mayer
Northeastern University
Page iv Seven Bridges Press LLC 135 Fifth Avenue New York NY 10010-7101 - photo 2
Page iv
Seven Bridges Press, LLC
135 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010-7101
Copyright 2000 by Chatham House Publishers of Seven Bridges Press, LLC
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher.
Publisher: Robert J. Gormley Managing editor: Katharine Miller Production supervisor: Melissa A. Martin Cover design: Inari Information Services, Inc. Composition; Ashdod Associates Printing and binding: Versa Press, Inc.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
In pursuit of the White House 2000: how we choose our presidential
nominees / edited by William G. Mayer.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 1-889119-17-2
1. PresidentsUnited StatesNomination. I. Mayer, William G., 1956
JK521 .152 1999
324.6'3'0973dc21 996575
CIP
Manufactured in the United States of America
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Page v
To Our Children
Natalie Logan Mayer
Anna and Thomas Ericksen Hagen
Katherine Noelle Busch
Rachel Shoshana and Miriam Joanna Bernstein
Alexander Kiliman Best
William Robert Atkeson Cary
Page vii
Contents
Preface
ix
1
The Modern Politics of Presidential Selection: How Changing the Rules Really Did Change the Game
Michael G. Hagen and William G. Mayer
1
2
New Features of the 2000 Presidential Nominating Process: Republican Reforms, Front-Loading's Second Wind, and Early Voting
Andrew E. Busch
57
3
The Changing Face of the New Hampshire Primary
Emmett H. Buell, Jr.
87
4
The New New Presidential Elite
Jonathan Bernstein
145
5
The Gender Gap in Presidential Nominations
Jody McMullen and Barbara Norrander
179
6
What Voters Know about the Candidates and How They Learn It: The 1996 New Hampshire Republican Primary as a Case Study
Tami Buhr
203
7
The Role of Televised Debates in the Presidential Nominating Process
Samuel J. Best and Clark Hubbard
255

Page viii
8
From the Primaries to the General Election: Does a Divisive Nomination Race Affect a Candidate's Fortunes in the Fall?
Lonna Rae Atkeson
285
9
A Brief History of Vice Presidential Selection
William G. Mayer
313
Tables and Figures
375
Index
379
About the Contributors
387

Page ix
Preface
Like the first volume in the series, this book has two principal objectives: to present a broad overview of the presidential nominating process through a detailed examination of some of its most significant components; and to showcase some of the most interesting work now being done on the politics of presidential selection. In every other respect, this book is new: new topics, mostly new contributors, and nine completely new chapters.
For an author, finishing a book is usually a cause for celebration.In this case that joy is greatly diminished by the knowledge that Ed Artinian is not here to share it with us. As the founder, owner, publisher, and Prime Mover at Chatham House, Ed leaves behind him both an impressive list of books and a legion of friends and admirers. For years, Ed was a fixture at political science conferences. Especially at regional meetings, participants could always count on finding three things: a printed program, a plastic badge, and Ed Artinian. My personal history with Ed is a particularly treasured one: he published my first academic article, he commissioned both volumes in this series, he was a wonderful source of gossip and cigars; he even sent a teddy bear to my newly born daughter. We will miss him.
That this book is being published approximately on time, even though much of the manuscript was sent in several months after the deadline, is a tribute to the people who have guided Chatham House through a difficult transition. The contributors to this book are especially grateful to Pat Artinian, Bob Gormley, Melissa Martin, and Katharine Miller.
As an attempt to stay abreast of ongoing developments in both the presidential nominating process and the political science literature on that subject, this book owes much to a small group of people with
Page x
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «In Pursuit of the White House 2000: How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees»

Look at similar books to In Pursuit of the White House 2000: How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «In Pursuit of the White House 2000: How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees»

Discussion, reviews of the book In Pursuit of the White House 2000: How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.