• Complain

Charles Murray - What It Means to Be a Libertarian: A Personal Interpretation

Here you can read online Charles Murray - What It Means to Be a Libertarian: A Personal Interpretation full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2010, publisher: Broadway Books, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Charles Murray What It Means to Be a Libertarian: A Personal Interpretation
  • Book:
    What It Means to Be a Libertarian: A Personal Interpretation
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Broadway Books
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2010
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

What It Means to Be a Libertarian: A Personal Interpretation: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "What It Means to Be a Libertarian: A Personal Interpretation" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Charles Murray believes that Americas founders had it right--strict limits on the power of the central government and strict protection of the individual are the keys to a genuinely free society. In What It Means to Be a Libertarian, he proposes a government reduced to the barest essentials: an executive branch consisting only of the White House and trimmed-down departments of state, defense, justice, and environment protection; a Congress so limited in power that it meets only a few months each year; and a federal code stripped of all but a handful of regulations.
Combining the tenets of classical Libertarian philosophy with his own highly-original, always provocative thinking, Murray shows why less government advances individual happiness and promotes more vital communities and a richer culture. By applying the truths our founders held to be self-evident to todays most urgent social and political problems, he creates a clear, workable vision for the future.
From the Trade Paperback edition.

Charles Murray: author's other books


Who wrote What It Means to Be a Libertarian: A Personal Interpretation? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

What It Means to Be a Libertarian: A Personal Interpretation — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "What It Means to Be a Libertarian: A Personal Interpretation" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
PRAISE FOR
W HAT I T M EANS TO B E A L IBERTARIAN

Seldom has so much substance and wisdom been packed into so few words. You might think that such a sweeping agenda would require a huge book. But, in fact, the political justifications for these huge governmental activities are remarkably vulnerable, as Murray demonstrates by puncturing them with a few well-placed thrusts.Forbes

[An] important new book by Charles Murray, one of Americas most controversial and important social scientists, will be added to the must-read list of those who want to understand more about the ideas that are coming to dominate the thinking of governments around the world.Chicago Tribune

It is a useful book; to echo Charles Handy, it should be compulsory reading for all politicians.Economist

[Murray] is persuasive when [he] identifies in the nations hallowed traditions as well as present-day sensibilities a prominent libertarian core. The prospects for the heralded renaissance can only be enhanced by the appearance of [this] intelligent, readable volume.National Review

[What It Means to Be a Libertarian] is a provocative, lean manifesto. For the polemic, the bare-bones argument, read Murray. For anyone of an age or an ambition to look into the likely political debates, causes and shifts of government in the first quarter of the twenty-first century, I recommend [it].Baltimore Sun

Speaking of broader appeal, Murray does not venture back into the murky waters of IQ analysis in this current volume. He sticks to the time-honored ideas he inherits from other libertarians and explains them with clarity and charm.New York Press

Murray, in this book, aims to be a Tom Paine for our times. Even a committed nonbeliever can appreciate an author who sets forth his normative ideas and proposals in such arresting terms.Washington Post Book World

A LSO BY C HARLES M URRAY

Losing Ground: American Social Policy 19501980

In Pursuit: Of Happiness and Good Government

The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life
(with Richard J. Herrnstein)

To the memory of my friends Richard Herrnstein and Karl Hass as different as - photo 1

To the memory of my friends Richard Herrnstein and Karl Hass,
as different as two men could be except in their courage,
kindness, and wisdom.

C ONTENTS

Let us, then, with courage and confidence pursue our own federal and republican principles, our attachment to our union and representative government. Entertaining a due sense of our equal right to the use of our own faculties, to the acquisitions of our industry, to honor and confidence from our fellow citizens, resulting not from birth but from our actions and their sense of them; enlightened by a benign religion, professed, indeed, and practiced in various forms, yet all of them including honesty, truth, temperance, gratitude, and the love of man; acknowledging and adoring an overruling Providence, which by all its dispensations proves that it delights in the happiness of man here and his greater happiness hereafter; with all these blessings, what more is necessary to make us a happy and prosperous people? Still one thing more, fellow citizensa wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government, and this is necessary to close the circle of our felicities.

T HOMAS J EFFERSON
First Inaugural Address
March 4, 1801

I NTRODUCTION

I N THE LAST QUARTER of the eighteenth century the American Founders created a society based on the belief that human happiness is intimately connected with personal freedom and responsibility. The twin pillars of the system they created were limits on the power of the central government and protection of individual rights.

A few people, of whom I am one, think that the Founders insights are as true today as they were two centuries ago. We believe that human happiness requires freedom and that freedom requires limited government. Limited government means a very small one, shorn of almost all of the apparatus we have come to take for granted during the last sixty years.

Most people are baffled by such views. Dont we realize that this is postindustrial America, not Jeffersons agrarian society? Dont we realize that without big government millions of the elderly would be destitute, corporations would destroy the environment, and employers would be free once more to exploit their workers? Where do we suppose blacks would be if it werent for the government? Women? Havent we noticed that America has huge social problems that arent going to be dealt with unless the government does something about them?

This book tries to explain how we can believe that the less government, the better. Why a society run on the principles of limited government would advance human happiness. How such a society would lead to greater individual fulfillment, more vital communities, a richer culture. Why such a society would contain fewer poor people, fewer neglected children, fewer criminals. How such a society would not abandon the less fortunate but would care for them better than does the society we have now.

Many books address the historical, economic, sociological, philosophical, and constitutional issues raised in these pages. A bibliographic essay at the end of the book points you to some of the basic sources, but the book you are about to read contains no footnotes. It has no tables and but a single graph. My purpose is not to provide proofs but to explain a way of looking at the world.

A Note About the Way This Book Uses the Word Libertarian

The correct word for my view of the world is liberal. Liberal is the simplest anglicization of the Latin liber, and freedom is what classical liberalism is all about. The writers of the nineteenth century who expounded on this view were called liberals. In Continental Europe they still are. In the pages that follow, I will occasionally use the phrase classical liberal to remind readers of this tradition. But words mean what people think they mean, and in the United States the unmodified term liberal now refers to the politics of an expansive government and the welfare state.

The contemporary alternative is libertarian. The problem here is that many of the leading thinkers of the libertarian movementLibertarians with a capital l, if you willpresent a logic of individual liberty that is purer and more uncompromising than the one you will find here. The similarities are great, but I am only a lower-case libertarian. I am too fond of tradition and the nonrational aspects of the human spirit to be otherwise. I am also conscious, however, that libertarians of the stricter school, fighting a lonely battle for many years, have established equity in the word. Many will understandably be annoyed at my applying the label to views that owe so much to another lowercase libertarian, Adam Smith, as well as to a conservative hero, Edmund Burke.

But it is also true that I have considerable company. A growing wing of libertarian thought has been working to reconcile the imperatives of human freedom with the indispensable roles that tradition and the classical virtues play in civic life. In an etymologically perfect world these people would still be called liberals, but they call themselves libertarians without fretting about it. From now on I will, too.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «What It Means to Be a Libertarian: A Personal Interpretation»

Look at similar books to What It Means to Be a Libertarian: A Personal Interpretation. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «What It Means to Be a Libertarian: A Personal Interpretation»

Discussion, reviews of the book What It Means to Be a Libertarian: A Personal Interpretation and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.