Javier Marias - Dark Back of Time

Maras is one of the best contemporary writers.

J. M. Coetzee

One of the writers who should get the Nobel Prize is Javier Maras.

Orhan Pamuk

A great writer.

Salman Rushdie

It is a rare gift, to be offered a writer who lives in our own time but speaks with the intensity of the past, who comes with the extra richness lent by a foreign history and nonetheless knows our own culture inside out. Yet, strangely, Javier Maras who is famous in Spain and garlanded with prizes from the rest of Europe remains almost unknown in America. What are we waiting for?

The New York Times Book Review

Javier Maras is one of the greatest living authors. I cannot think of one single contemporary writer that reaches his level of quality. If I had to name one, it would be Garca Mrquez.

Marcel Reich-Ranicki, Das Literarische Quartett

His prose demonstrates an unusual blend of sophistication and accessibility.

The New Yorker

Javier Maras is such an elegant, witty and persuasive writer that it is tempting simply to quote him at length.

The Scotsman

A supreme stylist.

The Times (London)

Maras uses language like an anatomist uses the scalpel to cut away the layers of the flesh in order to lay bare the innermost secrets of that strangest of species, the human being.

W. G. Sebald

His prose possesses an exquisite, almost uncanny observation, re-creating moments and moods in hypnotic depth.

The Telegraph (London)

Javier Maras is a novelist with style. His readers enter, through him, a strikingly and disturbingly foreign world.

Margaret Drabble

Maras writes the kind of old-fashioned speculative prose we associate with Proust and Henry James. But he also deals in violence, historical and personal, and in the movie titles, politicians, and brand names and underwear we connect with quite a different kind of writer.

London Review of Books

Javier Maras was born in Madrid in 1951. He has published thirteen novels, two collections of short stories, and several volumes of essays. His work has been translated into forty-two languages, in fifty-two countries, and won a dazzling array of international literary awards, including the prestigious Dublin IMPAC award for A Heart So White. He is also a highly practiced translator into Spanish of English authors, including Joseph Conrad, Robert Louis Stevenson, Sir Thomas Browne, and Laurence Sterne. He has held academic posts in Spain, the United States, and in Britain, as Lecturer in Spanish Literature at Oxford University.

I believe Ive still never mistaken fiction for reality, though I have mixed them together more than once, as everyone does, not only novelists or writers but everyone who has recounted anything since the time we know began, and no one in that known time has done anything but tell and tell, or prepare and ponder a tale, or plot one. Anyone can relate an anecdote about something that happened, and the simple fact of saying it already distorts and twists it, language cant reproduce events and shouldnt attempt to, and that, I imagine, is why during some trials the trials in movies, anyway, the ones I know best the implicated parties are asked to perform a material or physical reconstruction of what happened, repeating the gestures, the movements, the envenomed steps they took, the way they thrust the knife to become the accused; theyre asked to simulate seizing the weapon once again and delivering the blow to someone who, because of it, ceased to be and is no more, or rather to empty air, because it isnt enough for them to say it, to tell the story impassively and as precisely as possible, it must be seen, and an imitation, a representation or staging of it is required, though now without the knife in hand and without the body sack of flour, sack of flesh to drive it into, this time in cool detachment and without racking up another crime or adding another victim to the list, but only as pretense and memory, because what they can never reproduce is the time gone by or lost, nor can they revive the dead who are lost within that time and gone.

This indicates an ultimate mistrust of words, among other reasons because words even when spoken, even at their crudest are in and of themselves metaphorical and therefore imprecise, and cannot be imagined without ornament, though it is often involuntary; there is ornament in even the most arid exposition and frequently in interjections and insults as well. All anyone has to do is introduce an as if into the story, or not even that, all you need to do is use a simile, comparison or figure of speech (he was acting like a jerk, she flew into a ragethe kind of colloquial expression that belongs to the language more than to the speaker who chooses it, thats all it takes) and fiction creeps into the narration of what happened, altering or falsifying it. The time-honored aspiration of any chronicler or survivor to tell what happened, give an account of what took place, leave a record of events and crimes and exploits is, in fact, a mere illusion or chimera, or, rather, the phrase and concept themselves are already metaphorical and partake of fiction. To tell what happened is inconceivable and futile, or possible only as invention. The idea of testimony is also futile and there has never been a witness who could truly fulfil his duty. Anyway, you always forget far too many moments and hours and days and months and years, and the scar on a thigh that I saw and kissed every day for years during its known and lost time. You forget whole years, and not necessarily the least important ones.

Yet in these pages Im going to place myself on the side of those who have sometimes claimed to be telling what really happened or pretended to succeed in doing so, Im going to tell what happened, or was ascertained, or simply known what happened in my experience or in my fabulation or to my knowledge or perhaps all of it is only consciousness that never ceases as a result of the composition and circulation of a novel, a work of fiction. It certainly isnt anything momentous, nor is it serious yet, or pressing, though it may be entertaining to the curious reader who is willing, on principle, to accompany me; and for me it has the diversion of risk, the risk of narrating something for no reason and in almost no order, without making an outline or trying to be coherent, as if I were telling it in that fickle and unpredictable voice we all know, the voice of time when it has not yet gone by or been lost and perhaps for that reason is not even time; perhaps time is only what has already happened and can be told, or so it appears, and that is why time is the only thing that is ambiguous. That voice we hear is always fictitious, I believe, and perhaps mine will be too, in these pages.

I am not the first writer nor will I be the last whose life has been enriched or poisoned or only changed because of what he imagined or made up and wrote down and published. Unlike those of truly fictional novels, the elements of the story I am now embarking upon are entirely capricious, determined by chance, merely episodic and cumulative all of them irrelevant by the elementary rule of criticism, none of them requiring any of the others because in the end no author is guiding them, though I am relating them; they correspond to no blueprint, they are steered by no compass, most of them are external in origin and devoid of intention and therefore have no reason to make any kind of sense or to constitute an argument or plot or answer to some hidden harmony, and no lesson should be extracted from them (nor should any such thing be sought from real novels; above all, the novels themselves should not want it) not even a story with its beginning and suspense and final silence. I dont believe this is a story, though, not knowing how it ends, I may be mistaken. I do know that the beginning of this tale lies outside it, in a novel I wrote some time ago, or before that (in which case its even more amorphous), in the two years I spent as an imposter in the city of Oxford, teaching entertaining but on the whole quite useless subjects at its University and observing the passage of a previously agreed-upon period of time. Its ending must also lie outside it, and will surely coincide with my own, some years from now, or so I hope.