• Complain

Stephen Prothero - God Is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World--and Why Their Differences Matter

Here you can read online Stephen Prothero - God Is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World--and Why Their Differences Matter full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2010, publisher: HarperOne, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Stephen Prothero God Is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World--and Why Their Differences Matter
  • Book:
    God Is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World--and Why Their Differences Matter
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    HarperOne
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2010
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

God Is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World--and Why Their Differences Matter: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "God Is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World--and Why Their Differences Matter" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

At the dawn of the twenty-first century, dizzying scientific and technological advancements, interconnected globalized economies, and even the so-called New Atheists have done nothing to change one thing: our world remains furiously religious. For good and for evil, religion is the single greatest influence in the world. We accept as self-evident that competing economic systems (capitalist or communist) or clashing political parties (Republican or Democratic) propose very different solutions to our planets problems. So why do we pretend that the worlds religious traditions are different paths to the same God? We blur the sharp distinctions between religions at our own peril, argues religion scholar Stephen Prothero, and it is time to replace na?ve hopes of interreligious unity with deeper knowledge of religious differences. In Religious Literacy, Prothero demonstrated how little Americans know about their own religious traditions and why the worlds religions should be taught in public schools. Now, in God Is Not One, Prothero provides readers with this much-needed content about each of the eight great religions. To claim that all religions are the same is to misunderstand that each attempts to solve a different human problem. For example: Islam: the problem is pride / the solution is submission Christianity: the problem is sin / the solution is salvation Confucianism: the problem is chaos / the solution is social order Buddhism: the problem is suffering / the solution is awakening Judaism: the problem is exile / the solution is to return to God Prothero reveals each of these traditions on its own terms to create an indispensable guide for anyone who wants to better understand the big questions human beings have asked for millenniaand the disparate paths we are taking to answer them today. A bold polemical response to a generation of misguided scholarship, God Is Not One creates a new context for understanding religion in the twenty-first century and disproves the assumptions most of us make about the way the worlds religions work.

Stephen Prothero: author's other books


Who wrote God Is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World--and Why Their Differences Matter? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

God Is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World--and Why Their Differences Matter — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "God Is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World--and Why Their Differences Matter" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

To my students

Human goals are many, not all of them commensurable, and in
perpetual rivalry with one another.

Isaiah Berlin

Contents

S cholarly books on religion often use diacritical marks to indicate how a word is pronounced in Sanskrit or other sacred languages. In fact, use of diacriticals is a key way to signal ones scholarly bona fides. But diacritical marks are gibberish to most readersis that a breve () or a cedilla ()?so I avoid them here except in direct quotations, proper names, and citations. If an s with a mark underneath or atop it is pronounced like sh, then it appears here as sh: the Hindu god Shiva instead of Siva, the Hindu goal of moksha instead of moksa. Diacritical marks also present a barrier to the integration of non-Christian religious terms into Englisha barrier that is better torn down than built up. One reason the Sanskrit term nirva - n . a made it into English dictionaries was its willingness to drop the macron over the a and the underdot accompanying the n. And Hindu scriptures such as the Mahbhrata and the Rmyana are already finding wide acceptance among English speakers without their respective circumflexes.

Religious Studies scholars also typically date events either as C.E. (Common Era) or B.C.E. (before the Common Era), in an effort to avoid the Christian bias inherent in A.D. (Anno Domini, in the year of our Lord) and B.C. (before Christ). This is sleight of hand since these dates continue to mark events in relation to the life of Jesus whether or not those events are said to have occurred in C.E. or A.D. However, since the use of A.D. and B.C. indirectly imply belief in Jesus as both Lord and Christ, I use C.E. and B.C.E. here. Muslims have their own calendar, which begins with the hijra (flight or emigration) of Muhammad from Mecca to Medina in 622 C.E . So while this book appears in 2010 C.E. , it is also being published in A.H. 1431.

A t least since the first petals of the counterculture bloomed across Europe and the United States in the 1960s, it has been fashionable to affirm that all religions are beautiful and all are true. This claim, which reaches back to All Religions Are One (1795) by the English poet, printmaker, and prophet William Blake, is as odd as it is intriguing. No one argues that different economic systems or political regimes are one and the same. Capitalism and socialism are so obviously at odds that their differences hardly bear mentioning. The same goes for democracy and monarchy. Yet scholars continue to claim that religious rivals such as Hinduism and Islam, Judaism and Christianity are, by some miracle of the imagination, essentially the same, and this view resounds in the echo chamber of popular culture, not least in Dan Browns multi-million-dollar Da Vinci Code franchise.

The most popular metaphor for this view portrays the great religions as different paths up the same mountain. It is possible to climb lifes mountain from any side, but when the top is reached the trails converge, writes philosopher of religion Huston Smith. At base, in the foothills of theology, ritual, and organizational structure, the religions are distinct. Differences in culture, history, geography, and collective temperament all make for diverse starting points.... But beyond these differences, the same goal beckons. This is a comforting notion in a world in which religious violence often seems more present and potent than God. But is it true? If so, what might be waiting for us at the summit?

According to Mohandas Gandhi, Belief in one God is the cornerstone of all religions, so it is toward this one God that all religious people are climbing. When it comes to divinity, however, one is not the religions only number. Many Buddhists believe in no god, and many Hindus believe in thousands. Moreover, the characters of these gods differ wildly. Is God a warrior like Hinduisms Kali or a mild-mannered wanderer like Christianitys Jesus? Is God personal, or impersonal? Male, or female (or both)? Or beyond description altogether?

Like Gandhi, the Dalai Lama affirms that the essential message of all religions is very much the same. In his view, however, what the worlds religions share is not so much God as the Goodthe sweet harmony of peace, love, and understanding that religion writer Karen Armstrong also finds at the heart of every religion. To be sure, the worlds religious traditions do share many ethical precepts. No religion tells you it is okay to have sex with your mother or to murder your brother. The Golden Rule can be found not only in the Christian Bible and the Jewish Talmud but also in Confucian and Hindu books. No religion, however, sees ethics alone as its reason for being. Jews understand halakha (law or way) to include ritual too, and the Ten Commandments begin with how to worship God.

To be fair, those who claim that the worlds religions are one and the same do not deny the undeniable fact that they differ in some particulars. Obviously, Christians do not go on pilgrimage to Mecca, and Muslims do not practice baptism. Religious paths do diverge, Huston Smith admits, in the foothills of dogma, rites, and institutions.

This is a lovely sentiment but it is dangerous, disrespectful, and untrue. For more than a generation we have followed scholars and sages down the rabbit hole into a fantasy world in which all gods are one. This wishful thinking is motivated in part by an understandable rejection of the exclusivist missionary view that only you and your kind will make it to heaven or Paradise. For most of world history, human beings have seen religious rivals as inferior to themselvespractitioners of empty rituals, perpetrators of bogus miracles, purveyors of fanciful myths. The Age of Enlightenment in the eighteenth century popularized the ideal of religious tolerance, and we are doubtless better for it. But the idea of religious unity is wishful thinking nonetheless, and it has not made the world a safer place. In fact, this naive theological groupthinkcall it Godthinkhas made the world more dangerous by blinding us to the clashes of religions that threaten us worldwide. It is time we climbed out of the rabbit hole and back to reality.

The worlds religious rivals do converge when it comes to ethics, but they diverge sharply on doctrine, ritual, mythology, experience, and law. These differences may not matter to mystics or philosophers of religion, but they matter to ordinary religious people. Muslims do not think that the pilgrimage to Mecca they call the hajj is inessential. In fact, they include it among the Five Pillars of Islam. Catholics do not think that baptism is inessential. In fact, they include it among their seven sacraments. But religious differences do not just matter to religious practitioners. They have real effects in the real world. People refuse to marry this Muslim or that Hindu because of them. And in some cases religious differences move adherents to fight and to kill.

One purpose of the all religions are one mantra is to stop this fighting and this killing. And it is comforting to pretend that the great religions make up one big, happy family. But this sentiment, however well-intentioned, is neither accurate nor ethically responsible. God is not one. Faith in the unity of religions is just thatfaith (perhaps even a kind of fundamentalism). And the leap that gets us there is an act of the hyperactive imagination.

Allergic to Argument

One reason we are willing to follow our fantasies down the rabbit hole of religious unity is that we have become uncomfortable with argument. Especially when it comes to religion, we desperately want everyone to get along. In my Boston University courses, I work hard to foster respectful arguments. My students are good with respectful, but they are allergic to argument. They see arguing as ill-mannered, and even among friends they avoid it at almost any cost. Though they will debate the merits of the latest Coen brothers movie or U2 CD, they agree not to disagree about almost everything else. Especially when it comes to religion, young Americans at least are far more likely to say I feel than I think or (God forbid) I believe.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «God Is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World--and Why Their Differences Matter»

Look at similar books to God Is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World--and Why Their Differences Matter. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «God Is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World--and Why Their Differences Matter»

Discussion, reviews of the book God Is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World--and Why Their Differences Matter and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.