Extraordinary International Acclaim for Richard Dawkins and The God Delusion
If I had to identify Dawkins cardinal virtues, I would say that he is brilliant, articulate, impassioned, and impolite The God Delusion is a fine and significant book. irreverent and penetrating.
San Francisco Chronicle
Dawkins is frequently dismissed as a bully, but he is only putting theological doctrines to the same kind of scrutiny that any scientific theory must withstand.
Scientific American
The God Delusion deserves multiple readings, not just as an important work of science, but as a great work of literature.
Steven Weinberg, Times Literary Supplement (UK)
The most coherent and devastating indictment of religion I have ever read.
Mail on Sunday (UK)
This thoroughly engaging thesis on atheism cajoles, bullies, persuades and dazzlesSome of it is hard to disagree with, some of it will make you hopping mad. Perfect, really.
Sunday Times (Australia)
Fascinatingexpressed in sparkling language which makes the book not only a pleasure to read but also a stimulus to thinking across this widest of spectrums.
Financial Times
Engrossingthis is an elegant, engaging and persuasive writer The God Delusion is a good, strong argumentative challenge to any thoughtful believer with the courage to read it with care and try to dispute it.
The Globe and Mail (Canada)
A lively writeran entertaining readDawkinss outrage at the persistence of medieval ideas in the modern era is warranted. In fact, its overdue.
The Nation
Dawkins is Britains most famous atheist and in The God Delusion he gives eloquent vent to his uncompromising viewsif you want an understanding of evolution or an argument for atheism, there are few better guides than Richard Dawkins.
Sunday Telegraph (UK)
A surprisingly elegant and gracious conclusion, depicting science as exactly the kind of glorious expansion of our perceptions that we once thought only God could provide.
New York magazine
[A] well-stocked arsenal of anti-religious thought.
U.S. News and World Report
Passionate, clever, funny, uplifting and above all, desperately needed.
Daily Express (UK)
Lots of good, hard-hitting stuff about the imbecilities of religious fanatics and frauds of all stripes.
New York Times Book Review
You neednt buy the total Dawkins package to glory in his having the guts to lay out the evils religions can do.
Kirkus Reviews, starred review
A rallying cry to those who want to come out as non-believers, but are not quite sure if they dare.
Daily Mail (UK)
A gloriously belligerent attack on the foaming tide of superstition that is washing over the world once again, from a great scientist who has demonstrated throughout his career the power of cool, hard reason to explain life itself.
The Independent (UK)
Oh, its so refreshing, after being told all your life that it is virtuous to be full of faith, spirit, and superstition, to read such a resounding trumpet blast for truth instead. It feels like coming up for air.
Matt Ridley, author of Genome
A spirited and exhilarating readDawkins comes roaring forth in the full vigor of his powerful arguments.
Guardian (UK)
A wonderful bookjoyous, elegant, fair, engaging, and often very funnyinformed throughout by an exhilarating breadth of reference and clarity of thought.
Michael Frayn, author of The Human Touch
The God Delusion is written with all the clarity and elegance of which Dawkins is a master. It is so well written, in fact, that children deserve to read it as well as adults.
Philip Pullman, author of His Dark Materials trilogy
A brave and important book.
Desmond Morris, author of The Naked Ape
Richard Dawkins is the leading soothsayer of our time. Through his exploration of gene-based evolution of life his work has had a profound effect on so much of our collective thinking and The God Delusion continues his thought-provoking tradition.
J. Craig Venter, decoder of the human genome
Passionate religious irrationality too often poses serious obstacles to human betterment. To oppose it effectively, the world needs equally passionate rationalists unafraid to challenge long accepted beliefs. Richard Dawkins so stands out through the cutting intelligence of The God Delusion.
James D. Watson, co-discoverer of DNA, author of The Double Helix
Should be read by everyone from atheist to monk. If its merciless rationalism doesnt enrage you at some point, you probably arent alive.
Julian Barnes, author of Arthur and George
A magnificent book, lucid and wise, truly magisterial.
Ian McEwan, author of Atonement
Books by Richard Dawkins
THE SELFISH GENE
THE EXTENDED PHENOTYPE
THE BLIND WATCHMAKER
RIVER OUT OF EDEN
CLIMBING MOUNT IMPROBABLE
UNWEAVING THE RAINBOW
A DEVILS CHAPLAIN
THE ANCESTORS TALE
THE GOD DELUSION
Richard Dawkins
THE GOD DELUSION
A MARINER BOOK
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY
Boston New York
Copyright 2006 by Richard Dawkins
Preface 2008 by Richard Dawkins
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
First published in Great Britain by Bantam Press, a division of Transworld Publishers, 2006
For information about permission to reproduce selections from this book, write to Permissions, Houghton Mifflin Company, 215 Park Avenue South, New York, New York 10003.
www.houghtonmifflinbooks.com
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Dawkins, Richard, date.
The God delusion / Richard Dawkins.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN: 978-1-931498-23-4
1. Irreligion. 2. Atheism. 3. God. 4. Religion. I. Title.
bl2775.3.d39 2006
211'.8dc22 2006015506
IN MEMORIAM
Douglas Adams
(19522001)
Isnt it enough to see that a garden is beautiful
without having to believe that there are
fairies at the bottom of it too?
Contents
Preface to the paperback edition
The God Delusion in the hardback edition was widely described as the surprise bestseller of 2006. It was warmly received by the great majority of those who sent in their personal reviews to Amazon (more than 1,000 at the time of writing). Approval was less overwhelming in the printed reviews, however. A cynic might put this down to an unimaginative reflex of reviews editors: It has God in the title, so send it to a known faith-head. That would be too cynical, however. Several unfavourable reviews began with the phrase, which I long ago learned to treat as ominous, Im an atheist BUT As Daniel Dennett noted in Breaking the Spell , a bafflingly large number of intellectuals believe in belief even though they lack religious belief themselves. These vicarious second-order believers are often more zealous than the real thing, their zeal pumped up by ingratiating broad-mindedness: Alas, I cant share your faith but I respect and sympathize with it.
Im an atheist, BUT The sequel is nearly always unhelpful, nihilistic or worse suffused with a sort of exultant negativity. Notice, by the way, the distinction from another favourite genre: I used to be an atheist, but That is one of the oldest tricks in the book, much favoured by religious apologists from C. S. Lewis to the present day. It serves to establish some sort of street cred up front, and it is amazing how often it works. Look out for it.
I wrote an article for the website RichardDawkins.net called Im an atheist BUT and I have borrowed from it in the following list of critical or otherwise negative points from reviews of the hardback. That website, conducted by the inspired Josh Timonen, has attracted an enormous number of contributors who have effectively eviscerated all these criticisms, but in less guarded, more outspoken tones than my own, or than those of my academic colleagues A. C. Grayling, Daniel Dennett, Paul Kurtz, Steven Weinberg and others who have done so in print (and whose comments are reproduced on the same website).