• Complain

Smith C. U. M. - Brain, Mind and Consciousness in the History of Neuroscience

Here you can read online Smith C. U. M. - Brain, Mind and Consciousness in the History of Neuroscience full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Dordrecht, year: 2014, publisher: Imprint, Springer, Springer Netherlands, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Smith C. U. M. Brain, Mind and Consciousness in the History of Neuroscience
  • Book:
    Brain, Mind and Consciousness in the History of Neuroscience
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Imprint, Springer, Springer Netherlands
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2014
  • City:
    Dordrecht
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Brain, Mind and Consciousness in the History of Neuroscience: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Brain, Mind and Consciousness in the History of Neuroscience" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Introduction; C.U.M. Smith and H.A. Whitaker -- Chapter 1. Beginnings: ventricular neuropsychology; C.U.M. Smith -- Chapter 2. Return of the Repressed: Spinozan Ideas in the History of Mind and Brain Sciences; William Meehan -- Chapter 3. Struck, As It Were, With Madness: The Phenomenology of Animal Spirits in the Neurology of Thomas Willis; Kathryn Tabb -- Chapter 4. Hookes mechanical mind; J.J. MacIntosh -- Chapter 5. Joseph Priestley: An instructive 18th century perspective on the mind-body problem; Alan Beretta -- Chapter 6. Reflections of western thinking on 19th C Ottoman thought: A critique of the hard-problem by Spyridon Mavrogenis; George Anogianakis -- Chapter 7. George Henry Lewes (1817--1878): Embodied Cognition, Vitalism, and the Evolution of Symbolic Perception; Huw Price -- Chapter 8. Herbert Spencer: brain, mind and the hard problem; C.U.M. Smith -- Chapter 9. Problems of Consciousness in Nineteenth Century British and America Neurology; J Wayne Lazar -- Chapter 10. Emil du Bois-Reymonds Reflections on Consciousness ; Gabriel Finkelstein -- Chapter 11. William James and the {esc}(3z{esc}(BTheatre{esc}(3y{esc}(B of Consciousness; Stephanie L. Hawkins -- Chapter 12. The enigmatic deciphering of the neuronal code of word meaning; Andrew C. Papanicolaou -- Chapter 13. Alfred North Whitehead and the history of consciousness; Laura Hyatt Edwards -- Chapter 14. The hard problem and the Cartesian strand in British neurophysiology: Huxley, Foster, Sherrington, Eccles; C.U.M. Smith -- Chapter 15. Is there a link between quantum mechanics and consciousness?; Barry K Ward -- Chapter 16. Consciousness and neuronal microtubules: the Penrose-Hameroff quantum model in retrospect; Eugenio Frixione -- Chapter 17. Zombie Dawn: Slavery and the Self in the Twenty-first Century; David Hawkes -- Chapter 18. Mind and Brain: Toward an Understanding of Dualism; Kristopher Phillips, Alan Beretta and Harry Whitaker.;This volume of essays examines the problem of mind, looking at how the problem has appeared to neuroscientists (in the widest sense) from classical antiquity through to contemporary times. Beginning with a look at ventricular neuropsychology in antiquity, this book goes on to look at Spinozan ideas on the links between mind and body, Thomas Willis and the foundation of Neurology, Hookes mechanical model of the mind and Joseph Priestleys approach to the mind-body problem. The volume offers a chapter on the 19th century Ottoman perspective on western thinking. Further chapters trace the work of nineteenth century scholars including George Henry Lewes, Herbert Spencer and Emil du Bois-Reymond. The book covers significant work from the twentieth century, including an examination of Alfred North Whitehead and the history of consciousness, and particular attention is given to the development of quantum consciousness. Chapters on slavery and the self and the development of an understanding of Dualism bring this examination up to date on the latest 21st century work in the field. At the heart of this book is the matter of how we define the problem of consciousness itself: has there been any progress in our understanding of the working of mind and brain? This work at the interface between science and the humanities will appeal to experts from across many fields who wish to develop their understanding of the problem of consciousness, including scholars of Neuroscience, Behavioural Science and the History of Science.

Smith C. U. M.: author's other books


Who wrote Brain, Mind and Consciousness in the History of Neuroscience? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Brain, Mind and Consciousness in the History of Neuroscience — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Brain, Mind and Consciousness in the History of Neuroscience" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
C.U.M. Smith and Harry Whitaker (eds.) History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences Brain, Mind and Consciousness in the History of Neuroscience 2014 10.1007/978-94-017-8774-1_1
Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014
1. Beginnings: Ventricular Psychology
C. U. M. Smith 1
(1)
Emeritus, Department of Vision Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, B4 7ET Birmingham, UK
C. U. M. Smith
Email:
Deceased
Abstract
From Platonic and Galenic roots, the first well developed ventricular theory of brain function is due to Bishop Nemesius, fourth century C.E. Although more interested in the Christian concept of soul, St. Augustine, too addressed the question of the location of the soul, a problem that has endured in various guises to the present day. Other notable contributions to ventricular psychology are the ninth century C.E. Arabic writer, Qusta ibn Lq, and an early European medical text written by the twelfth century C.E. author, Nicolai the Physician. By the time of Albertus Magnus, so-called medieval cell doctrine was a well-developed model of brain function. By the sixteenth century, Vesalius no longer understands the ventricles to be imaginary cavities designed to provide a physical basis for faculty psychology but as fluid-filled spaces in the brain whose function is yet to be determined.
Author was deceased at the time of publication.
... this part which must be such as to control and govern the passage of the pneuma ... is not the pineal body but the epiphysis that is very like a worm and is extended along the whole canal (Galen: De usu partium corporis humani (Transl. M.T. May))
Alfred North Whitehead famously said that all Western thought is but a series of footnotes to Plato. So let us start with Plato and, in particular, with that curious Pythagorean tract he published as a sort of addendum to the Republic . The Timaeus was in fact the only one of Platos works known to the Latin West until the translation surge of original Greek texts after the fall of Constantinople in 1453 ushered in the Renaissance. It describes in a dreamy manner a primitive neurophysiology to set alongside the poetical psychology of the Republic and the Phaedrus . Thus in the Timaeus we find a tripartite neurophysiology to parallel the tripartite sociology of the Republic : the proletariat, the warriors and the philosophers being represented in the body by a concupiscent soul beneath the diaphragm, a warrior soul in the thorax, and an intellectual soul in the head. It is only the latter soul that has the prospect of immortality, returning in a Buddhist-like cycle, through the forms of lesser animals, depending on its performance during life. The two lower souls are not offered this opportunity and perish when the body dies. The point being made here is that from remote antiquity (and Platos likely story is derived from yet earlier Pythagorean thought) a distinction was made between an immortal and a mortal soul.
Platos greatest pupil, Aristotle, was also clear that the intellect was something different from the other forces that motivated the human body. He also divided these indwelling forces or souls into three kinds: vegetable, animal and rational. Although he does not follow Plato in assigning immortality to the rational soul, he nevertheless points out that it cannot be blended with the body, else it would acquire one or other of the bodys characteristics, (warmth, cold etc.) and this is not the case. In addition, whilst sensations fade with repetition (habituate, we would say), thought only becomes clearer with practice ( De anima 429b1 ).
When we come to the Alexandrian neurophysiologists, Herophilus and Erasistratus, or what fragments of their work that have come down to us, we do not find this philosophical concern with the immortality or otherwise of the ratiocinative soul. Instead we find a more focused approach on the bodys physiology. Nevertheless, a tripartite classification still obtains. Blood, nutritive spirit, is contained in the veins, vital spirit or pneuma zotikon in the arteries, and animal spirit or pneuma psychikon in the nerves. These vessels, intertwined down to and below the level of ordinary visibility, form the substance of the flesh.
The last great alumnus of the Alexandrian medical school, Claudius Galen, half a millennium after Herophilus and Erasistratus, developed the Alexandrian neurophysiology by showing experimentally that the arteries did not contain pneuma zotikon but, as William Harvey, was later to put it, nothing but the equivocal gore. He also dissected the brain to show that it contained four ventriclestwo anterior ventricles (our lateral ventricles), a middle ventricle (our third) and a posterior ventricle (our fourth). These cavities he observed to be full of spirit which, he argued, had been distilled from the blood. This spirit, pneuma psychikon or animal spirit, was destined to play a long and significant role in neuropsychology.
Galen also described two other structures which were to have similarly long and significant roles in medieval neuropsychology. One was the pineal gland or conarium , the other was a worm-like structure that, he says, extends along the wall of the whole passage between the middle and posterior ventricle.
Before his time the pineal was thought, he says, to have the same function as the pylorus of the stomach. Just as the pyloric valve controls the flow of nutrients from the stomach to the small intestine, so the pineal was thought to control the flow of pneuma from the middle to the posterior ventricle. In spite of Galens vehemence we shall see that the pineal made a remarkable come-back in late medieval and Renaissance neuropsychology.
Nevertheless, Galen felt the need of some ventricular structure to control the flow of pneuma from the anterior to the posterior ventricles. This valving action was, he believed, undertaken by the worm-like structure that he had found to line the passage between the two ventricles. Those versed in anatomy he writes, have named it for its shape alone and call it the vermiform epiphysis [ vermis superior cerebelli ]. It is this, he writes, that regulates the flow of animal spirit from the middle to the posterior ventricle. We touch later on the problem of where and how and when Galens epiphysis became confused with the pineal or conarium.
In addition to being an anatomist Galen was also an experimentalist. A famous piece of serendipity resulted in his discovery of one of the functions of the recurrent laryngeal nerve when he accidentally cut it and found that his experimental animalin this case a pigstopped squealing. Evidently the brain controlled the voice, that most expressive signature of the soul. He also investigated the significance of the ventricles. In his short work on breathing he remarks that:
Since the emptying of the pneuma from the hollows of the brain, when it is wounded, at once makes men motionless and without sense, it must be surely that this pneuma is either the very substance of the soul or its primary organ.
This uncertainty over whether the pneuma psychikon or animal spirit is the very substance of the soul or its primary organ persists, as we shall see, for a millennium. Galen next proceeded to investigate the significance of the different ventricles. Pressing down on each in turn he showed that the posterior, our fourth, was the most important. Its destruction, he found, invariably led to the death of the animal. The importance of this ventricle was also emphasized by his observation that the cranial nerves originated from the medulla or from the floor of the fourth ventricle beneath the parencephalon, our cerebellum. He noted the pulsations of the brain when the skull had been removed and concluded that the brain, like the heart, acted as a pump to force fluid, in this case the pneuma psychikon within the ventricles, to flow out along the nerves. The significance of the vermiform valve is now apparent. This, of course, was long before Harvey established the true rate at which blood flows around the circulatory system. For Galen and the ancients the flow was only sluggish, so the analogy with the imagined flow of animal spirit was not far-fetched.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Brain, Mind and Consciousness in the History of Neuroscience»

Look at similar books to Brain, Mind and Consciousness in the History of Neuroscience. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Brain, Mind and Consciousness in the History of Neuroscience»

Discussion, reviews of the book Brain, Mind and Consciousness in the History of Neuroscience and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.