• Complain

Shabnum Tejani - Indian Secularism: A Social and Intellectual History, 1890-1950

Here you can read online Shabnum Tejani - Indian Secularism: A Social and Intellectual History, 1890-1950 full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2008, publisher: Indiana University Press, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Shabnum Tejani Indian Secularism: A Social and Intellectual History, 1890-1950
  • Book:
    Indian Secularism: A Social and Intellectual History, 1890-1950
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Indiana University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2008
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Indian Secularism: A Social and Intellectual History, 1890-1950: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Indian Secularism: A Social and Intellectual History, 1890-1950" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Shabnum Tejani: author's other books


Who wrote Indian Secularism: A Social and Intellectual History, 1890-1950? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Indian Secularism: A Social and Intellectual History, 1890-1950 — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Indian Secularism: A Social and Intellectual History, 1890-1950" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Indian Secularism
Indian Secularism
A Social and Intellectual History 18901950
SHABNUM TEJANI
Indiana University Press
Bloomington & Indianapolis
This book is a publication of
Indiana University Press
601 North Morton Street
Bloomington, Indiana 47404-3797 USA
http://iupress.indiana.edu
Telephone orders
Fax orders
Orders by e-mail
800-842-6796
812-855-7931
2008 by Shabnum Tejani
All rights reserved
No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The Association of American University Presses Resolution on Permissions constitutes the only exception to this prohibition.
The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information SciencesPermanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984.
Manufactured in the United States of America
Cataloging information is available from the Library of Congress.
ISBN 978-0-253-35256-9 (cl.)
ISBN 978-0-253-22044-8 (pbk.)
12345131211100908
Contents
M APS
Acknowledgements
T he debts I have incurred in the years it has taken me to bring this book to completion are many. The book grows out of my doctoral work at Columbia University and so my first debt is to my supervisor, Ayesha Jalal. Ayesha has been friend and mentor over many years. The intensity of her intellectual engagement as well as the affection underlying her belief in this work is a lesson I aim to take forward. Ayesha has engaged with this project at all stages. I hope she sees her imprint on it. Thanks also go to David Armitage, Talal Asad, Dennis Dalton, and Nicholas Dirks, with whom I had the privilege of working for some time. Each of their contributions enabled me move the project forward.
I am grateful to the staff at libraries in India and Britain from which I drew the material for this study: the National Archives of India and the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library in New Delhi; the Maharashtra State Archives, the Deputy Inspector Generals Office, Bombay University Library and the Asiatic Library in Mumbai; the Oriental and India Office Collections in London; and the library of the Centre for South Asian Studies in Cambridge. Conversations with scholars in India in the initial stages of research helped formulate my methodological approach: Mushirul Hasan, Asghar Ali Engineer, the late Ravinder Kumar, Y.D. Phadke, Asiya Siddiqi, and the late Rafiq Zakaria.
I received support from a number of different sources to pursue this project. I would like to acknowledge, in order of receipt, a multi-year fellowship from the History Department at Columbia University, a junior research fellowship from the American Institute of Indian Studies, an alumni grant from Oberlin College, a travel grant from the Old Bancroftians Association, a Whiting dissertation writing fellowship from Columbia University, and a fellowship from the Arts and Humanities Research Council in Britain which my employing institution, the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), very generously agreed to match.
The research time in India was perhaps the most enjoyable part of this process. But it would not have been as productive or rewarding had it not been for the many people who generously took me into their homes. In Delhi, my cousin Anis Raza and her family took care of me in the way that only family can. I also befriended Kavita Misra. I am especially grateful to her parents, Soumendra and Chandramohini Misra, who have taken me in and treated me like a daughter on many occasions. I was equally fortunate in Bombay. Despite many other pressing demands, Indubhushan, Indira and Mona Doctor welcomed me into their home for several months and on many subsequent visits.
I am lucky to have colleagues and friends with whom I have been able to talk through many of my ideas and from whom I have learned immensely. Daud Ali, Chetan Bhatt, Durba Ghosh, Sangeeta Kamat, Biju Mathew, Rajit Mazumder, Ali Mir, Sanghamitra Misra, Anu Needham, Rochelle Pinto, Subir Sinha, Deborah Sutton, Mridu Rai, Siddharth Varadarajan, and Rashmi Varma among others have provided an engaging intellectual environment over the years. Peter Robb and Tom Tomlinson at SOAS read the dissertation and provided invaluable advice on how to find the book that was buried in there. Many thanks go to Rukun Advani for believing in this book and for going above and beyond the call of duty to ensure its production was as rapid and wrinkle-free as one could ever hope.
In the solitary endeavour of writing, one becomes acutely aware of the importance of friendship. In this, my acknowledgements go to Aaron Agnee, Naomi Burns, Valerie De Cruz, Anene Ejikeme, Nelida Fuccaro, Shaalan Farouk, Amy Hsi, Sangeeta Kamat, Emanuelle Kihm, Biju Mathew, Rachel Mattson, Carol Miles, Kavita Misra, Joey Mogul, Renu Nahata, Sonali Sathaye, Sam Shinn, Mohan Sikka, and Vinay Swamy for their unswerving affection and for providing welcome distraction from my work. Thank you to Mike Spencer for teaching me the importance of non-intellectual work. My debt to John Parker is of a different order. Without his encouragement, advice, and critical editorial interventions, the book would have been far less than it is.
My greatest acknowledgement, however, is to my family, for without them this would not have been possible. In particular, my thanks go to my two aunts, Malika Amin and Gulbanu Mavany; my mother Sakkar Tejani; and my brother, Abbas, who have always provided a loving environment and a sane perspective. It is to my mother that I dedicate this book.
Glossary
Adivasi
term for Indias tribals
Anjuman
an association, usually of Muslims
Arya
here refers to Indo-European tribes who are meant to have invaded the Indian subcontinent around the second millennium BC
Bahujan Samaj
Marathi phrase, loosely meaning the society of the majority, commonly used to denote Dalits in the Hindi belt
Bania
term used for members of castes associated with commerce, trade, or moneylending
Bhadralok
decent folk (Bengali); educated high-caste Bengali Hindus
Bhatia
Bania trading caste from Gujarat
Chaturvarna
the system of the four varnas (see varna)
Chitpavan
a subcaste of Brahmans from the Konkan; the caste of the peshwas, who played an important role in Maharashtra as governors and administrators
Dalit
Marathi/Hindi term meaning the oppressed; term for untouchable groups, now used in preference to the Gandhian appellation harijan
Dar-ul-harb
Arabic term meaning land of war; a territory in which the sharia is not observed and in which, according to classical Muslim jurisprudence, believers should choose between jihad and hijrat
Dar-ul-Islam
Arabic term meaning abode of Islam; a territory in which the sharia is observed
Deshastha
Brahman caste of Maharashtra
Deshmukh
Marathi term for the head of an armed elite family vested by Maratha rulers with authority over a grouping of villages; a revenue official under the British
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Indian Secularism: A Social and Intellectual History, 1890-1950»

Look at similar books to Indian Secularism: A Social and Intellectual History, 1890-1950. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Indian Secularism: A Social and Intellectual History, 1890-1950»

Discussion, reviews of the book Indian Secularism: A Social and Intellectual History, 1890-1950 and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.