• Complain

Marcelo Gleiser - Great Minds Dont Think Alike: Debates on Consciousness, Reality, Intelligence, Faith, Time, AI, Immortality, and the Human

Here you can read online Marcelo Gleiser - Great Minds Dont Think Alike: Debates on Consciousness, Reality, Intelligence, Faith, Time, AI, Immortality, and the Human full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2022, publisher: Columbia University Press, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Marcelo Gleiser Great Minds Dont Think Alike: Debates on Consciousness, Reality, Intelligence, Faith, Time, AI, Immortality, and the Human
  • Book:
    Great Minds Dont Think Alike: Debates on Consciousness, Reality, Intelligence, Faith, Time, AI, Immortality, and the Human
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Columbia University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2022
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Great Minds Dont Think Alike: Debates on Consciousness, Reality, Intelligence, Faith, Time, AI, Immortality, and the Human: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Great Minds Dont Think Alike: Debates on Consciousness, Reality, Intelligence, Faith, Time, AI, Immortality, and the Human" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Does technology change who we are, and if so, in what ways? Can humanity transcend physical bodies and spaces? Will AI and genetic engineering help us reach new heights or will they unleash dystopias? How do we face mortality, our own and that of our warming planet? Questions like these--which are only growing more urgent--can be answered only by drawing on different kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing. They challenge us to bridge the divide between the sciences and the humanities and bring together perspectives that are too often kept apart.Great Minds Dont Think Alike presents conversations among leading scientists, philosophers, historians, and public intellectuals that exemplify openness to diverse viewpoints and the productive exchange of ideas. Pulitzer and Templeton Prize winners, MacArthur genius grant awardees, and other acclaimed writers and thinkers debate the big questions: who we are, the nature of reality, science and religion, consciousness and materialism, and the mysteries of time. In so doing, they also inquire into how uniting experts from different areas of study to consider these topics might help us address the existential risks we face today. Convened and moderated by the physicist and author Marcelo Gleiser, these public dialogues model constructive engagement between the sciences and the humanities--and show why intellectual cooperation is necessary to shape our collective future.Contributors include David Chalmers and Antonio Damasio; Sean Carroll and B. Alan Wallace; Patricia Churchland and Jill Tarter; Rebecca Goldstein and Alan Lightman; Jimena Canales and Paul Davies; Ed Boyden and Mark OConnell; Elizabeth Kolbert and Siddhartha Mukherjee; Jeremy DeSilva, David Grinspoon, and Tasneem Zehra Husain.

Marcelo Gleiser: author's other books


Who wrote Great Minds Dont Think Alike: Debates on Consciousness, Reality, Intelligence, Faith, Time, AI, Immortality, and the Human? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Great Minds Dont Think Alike: Debates on Consciousness, Reality, Intelligence, Faith, Time, AI, Immortality, and the Human — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Great Minds Dont Think Alike: Debates on Consciousness, Reality, Intelligence, Faith, Time, AI, Immortality, and the Human" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Table of Contents
Great Minds Dont Think Alike Debates on Consciousness Reality Intelligence Faith Time AI Immortality and the Human - image 1
GREAT MINDS DONT THINK ALIKE
GREAT MINDS
DONT THINK ALIKE
DEBATES ON
CONSCIOUSNESS, REALITY,
INTELLIGENCE, FAITH, TIME,
AI, IMMORTALITY, AND
THE HUMAN
Great Minds Dont Think Alike Debates on Consciousness Reality Intelligence Faith Time AI Immortality and the Human - image 2
EDITED AND WITH COMMENTARY BY
MARCELO GLEISER
Columbia University Press
New York
Picture 3
Columbia University Press
Publishers Since 1893
New York Chichester, West Sussex
cup.columbia.edu
Copyright 2022 Marcelo Gleiser
All rights reserved
EISBN 978-0-231-55537-1
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Gleiser, Marcelo, author.
Title: Great minds dont think alike : debates on consciousness, reality,
intelligence, faith, time, AI, immortality, and the human / by Marcelo Gleiser.
Description: New York : Columbia University Press, [2021] | Includes index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2021022050 (print) | LCCN 2021022051 (ebook) |
ISBN 9780231204101 (hardback) | ISBN 9780231204118 (trade paperback) |
ISBN 9780231555371 (ebook)
Subjects: LCSH: Philosophy.
Classification: LCC B53 .G49 2021 (print) | LCC B53 (ebook) | DDC 100dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2021022050
LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2021022051
A Columbia University Press E-book.
CUP would be pleased to hear about your reading experience with this e-book at .
Cover design: Noah Arlow
Contents
THE DIALOGUES
1 The Mystery of Consciousness: A Dialogue
Between a Neuroscientist and a Philosopher
David Chalmers and Antonio Damasio 2 The Nature of Reality A Dialogue - photo 4
David Chalmers and Antonio Damasio
2 The Nature of Reality: A Dialogue Between a
Buddhist Scholar and a Theoretical Physicist
Sean Carroll and B Alan Wallace 3 Future of Intelligence Human Machine - photo 5
Sean Carroll and B. Alan Wallace
3 Future of Intelligence: Human, Machine,
and Extraterrestrial: A Dialogue between an
Astronomer and a Philosopher
Patricia Churchland and Jill Tarter 4 The Nature of Spirituality A dialogue - photo 6
Patricia Churchland and Jill Tarter
4 The Nature of Spirituality: A dialogue on
Science and Religion
Rebecca Goldstein and Alan Lightman 5 The Mystery of Time A Dialogue Between - photo 7
Rebecca Goldstein and Alan Lightman
5 The Mystery of Time: A Dialogue Between
a science historian and a Physicist
Jimena Canales and Paul Davies 6 Cyborgs Futurists Transhumanism A - photo 8
Jimena Canales and Paul Davies
6 Cyborgs, Futurists, & Transhumanism:
A Dialogue Between a Neuroscientist
and an Author
Ed Boyden and Mark OConnell 7 On Human and Planetary Longevity A Dialogue - photo 9
Ed Boyden and Mark OConnell
7 On Human and Planetary Longevity: A Dialogue
Between an Environmentalist and a Doctor
Elizabeth Kolbert and Siddhartha Mukherjee 8 On Being Human A Dialogue on - photo 10
Elizabeth Kolbert and Siddhartha Mukherjee
8 On Being Human: A Dialogue on Literary and
Scientific Perspectives
Jeremy DeSilva David Grinspoon and Tasneem Zehra Husain I n Fall 2016 I - photo 11
Jeremy DeSilva, David Grinspoon,
and Tasneem Zehra Husain
I n Fall 2016, I joined the stage of 92nd Street Y in New York City with neuroscientist Antonio Damasio and philosopher David Chalmers for a conversation on the Mystery of Consciousness. This was the first in a series of public dialogues that I conducted for the next five years in theaters and universities across the United States. They were part of the activities of the Institute for Cross-Disciplinary Engagement at Dartmouth, which I founded with generous funding from the John Templeton Foundation. Our mission was to bring scientists and humanists together, in what I call constructive engagement, to discuss and confront some of the most challenging questions of our times, from the more abstract What is the nature of reality? to the more practical What is the future of humanity in the age of AI? Our motivation was the essential realization that such questions are too complex to be addressed one-dimensionally, either only by the sciences or only by the humanities. As with many questions that define our time, they call for a pluralistic approach, combining different ways of knowing, if we are to make progress in answering them. There are, of course, many questions that are very much within the sole province of either the sciences or the humanities and these, for obvious reasons, were not part of our dialogues. The selection of topics discussed is certainly not complete, but it will hopefully illustrate that the sciences and the humanities have much to say to one another in matters of great import and interest to our collective future.
This volume includes eight of these conversations, in some cases with questions from the audience as well. The topics are broad and timely, and the list of contributors is impressive, from Pulitzer and Templeton Prize winners to MacArthur genius grant fellows and well-known public intellectuals. We live in times when civil discourse is seriously threatened by bigotry and tribal entrenchment. My hope is that the conversations in this book will set an example for how people can engage in a fruitful exchange of ideas, even when there is disagreement.
Beyond the Two Culture Divide
I believe the intellectual life of the whole of western society is increasingly being split into two polar groups. So wrote the British physicist and novelist C. P. Snow in his famous The Two Cultures Rede Lecture delivered at Cambridge University in 1959. Although Snow was mostly concerned with the divisions he felt in his own personal and professional experience between the literary intellectuals and physical scientists, the two-culture split has come to symbolize a wider and ever-growing gulf in academia between the sciences and the humanities. This split, and the strife it often generates, is palpable in most universities, and it speaks directly to the heart of the liberal arts curriculum of schools across the globe, and to the markedly wrong, widespread perception that in a technology-driven world, the humanities are an anachronism.
The roots of this unfortunate split between the two cultures reach back beyond the Enlightenment and its discontents, having been amplified by an increasingly successful scientific enterprise and the consequent technologization of society. The seventeenth century marked a turning point in human intellectual history where what we now call the sciences started to carve their own path away from the Greek philosophical tradition. Kepler, Galileo, Descartes, Newton, Boyle, and many others took off as
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Great Minds Dont Think Alike: Debates on Consciousness, Reality, Intelligence, Faith, Time, AI, Immortality, and the Human»

Look at similar books to Great Minds Dont Think Alike: Debates on Consciousness, Reality, Intelligence, Faith, Time, AI, Immortality, and the Human. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Great Minds Dont Think Alike: Debates on Consciousness, Reality, Intelligence, Faith, Time, AI, Immortality, and the Human»

Discussion, reviews of the book Great Minds Dont Think Alike: Debates on Consciousness, Reality, Intelligence, Faith, Time, AI, Immortality, and the Human and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.