• Complain

Howard Burton - Quest for Freedom: A Conversation with Quentin Skinner

Here you can read online Howard Burton - Quest for Freedom: A Conversation with Quentin Skinner full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2020, publisher: Open Agenda Publishing, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Quest for Freedom: A Conversation with Quentin Skinner
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Open Agenda Publishing
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2020
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Quest for Freedom: A Conversation with Quentin Skinner: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Quest for Freedom: A Conversation with Quentin Skinner" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

This book is based on an in-depth conversation between Howard Burton and intellectual historian Quentin Skinner, Barber Beaumont Professor of the Humanities at Queen Mary University of London. Quentin Skinner is considered to be one of the founders of the Cambridge School of the history of political thought. This thoughtful, detailed conversation examines how Quentin Skinner came to appreciate the importance of the distinction between the modern view of freedom and the so-called neo-Roman view, together with what it implies for our current and future political understanding.

This carefully-edited book includes an introduction, Status Symbols, and questions for discussion at the end of each chapter:

  • Paradoxical Origins - Puzzled by Machiavelli
  • Presupposing the State - The triumph of the modern liberal view
  • The Perils of Arbitrary Power - Becoming a slave
  • Freedom, Applied - Contemporary politics through the lens of arbitrary power
  • Rhetoric - Closely examining another classical Roman idea
  • Reshaping a Moral World - Recovering important ideas
  • Question and Answer - Resisting the lure of the canonical
  • About Ideas Roadshow Conversations Series (100 books):

    Presented in an accessible, conversational format, Ideas Roadshow books not only explore frontline academic research featuring world-leading researchers, including 3 Nobel Laureates, but also reveal the inspirations and personal journeys behind the research. Howard Burton holds a PhD in physics and an MA in philosophy, and was the Founding Director of Canadas Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics.

    Howard Burton: author's other books


    Who wrote Quest for Freedom: A Conversation with Quentin Skinner? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

    Quest for Freedom: A Conversation with Quentin Skinner — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

    Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Quest for Freedom: A Conversation with Quentin Skinner" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

    Light

    Font size:

    Reset

    Interval:

    Bookmark:

    Make
    Ideas Roadshow conversations present a wealth of candid insights from some of - photo 1
    Ideas Roadshow conversations present a wealth of candid insights from some of - photo 2

    Ideas Roadshow conversations present a wealth of candid insights from some of the worlds leading experts, generated through a focused yet informal setting. They are explicitly designed to give non-specialists a uniquely accessible window into frontline research and scholarship that wouldnt otherwise be encountered through standard lectures and textbooks.

    Over 100 Ideas Roadshow conversations have been held since our debut in 2012, covering a wide array of topics across the arts and sciences.

    See www.ideas-on-film.com/ideasroadshow for a full listing.

    Copyright 2014, 2020 Open Agenda Publishing. All rights reserved.

    ISBN: 978-1-77170-085-6

    Edited with an introduction by Howard Burton.

    All Ideas Roadshow Conversations use Canadian spelling.

    Contents
    A Note on the Text

    The contents of this book are based upon a filmed conversation between Howard Burton and Quentin Skinner in Princeton, New Jersey, on June 5, 2014.

    Quentin Skinner is Barber Beaumont Professor of the Humanities at Queen Mary University of London.

    Howard Burton is the creator and host of Ideas Roadshow and was Founding Executive Director of Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics.

    Introduction
    Status Symbols

    What does it mean to be free?

    That hardly seems like a terribly difficult question to answer. Im free if Im unconstrained, unimpeded, allowed to act as I see fit. Simple, right?

    Well, maybe.

    Quentin Skinner, one of the worlds foremost intellectual historians, admits that the concept of freedom had long befuddled him.

    It began with historical work that I was doing when I was writing my first book, The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. I was working on questions about Renaissance moral and political philosophy and came upon some ideas that, quite frankly, puzzled me, because I was assuming that there would be great continuity in thinking about questions of freedom and citizenship, but there wasnt. I was coming upon a view that suggested that you could not be a free citizen unless you were a politically engaged citizen.

    Its not difficult to see the problem. For most of us, being politically active simply has nothing to do with our sense of being free.

    In his customarily forthright fashion, Quentin shared with me his intellectual meanderings. Could it be that what he was grappling with was simply a rehashed view of Aristotles famous dictum that man was a political animal? That, as a naturally political creature, the free man was the exemplar of the species, the one who best realized his potential and thus was somehow maximally political? That freedom in some way represented some sort of acme of human moral potential?

    Perhaps. After all, he admits, there was a good deal of modern precedent for such neo-Aristotelian thinking. The renowned 20th-century philosopher Hannah Arendt, in particular, makes an essential equivalence between freedom and politics.

    For her, freedom just is politics. That is to say, the democratic project of people being thoroughly engaged as citizens is an instantiation and a declaration of freedom. So I started to think that that was what I was confronting.

    But still, things didnt quite fit. He couldnt help feeling that the proper way to look at things wasnt so much a description of human potential, but rather a societal prescription for ensuring that you dont lose what youve already got. In other words, as Quentin puts it:

    The more I read, the more I saw that the claim that was being made was a causal claim. In a way, that seemed more intuitive when I thought about it. The claim seemed to be that if you want to remain free as a citizen, then its a causal condition of the maintenance of that freedom that you should actively participate in the life of your community.

    This, Quentin recognized, was a very different kettle of fish than the notion of the free person being unencumbered to perform this or that action. While the wordfreedomwas clearly the same, writers in the Renaissance and Ancient Rome were actually using it in an entirely different way.

    What the writers I was finding in the Renaissance, and then back to Romanas opposed to Greekantiquity wanted to say, is that freedom should not be understood as a predicate of actions, essentially, at all. Freedom is the name of a status. Thats what they wanted us to understand. Their emphasis was not on whether Im free to do this or that. Of course that was important to them. But what was fundamental to them was the question, Do you have the status of being a free person? Thats the question theyre asking.

    So score one for Professor Skinners literary detective skills. But why should we care whether or not classical Romans or Renaissance thinkers used terms like freedom differently from the way we do now? Isnt that just all ancient history?

    No. Because Quentin believes truly understanding these classical thinkers might significantly inform our judgements as we grapple with some of todays pressing issues. When governments spy on our emails, for instance, they dont just violate our privacy (although they surely do that as well), they cause usever so slightlyto think differently, to act differently. We begin to consider leaving things out of our correspondence that could conceivably be regarded as incriminating. We begin to write different sorts of messages altogetherperhaps dont bother to write them at all. In other words, we start censoring ourselves.

    To an ancient Roman, such behaviour could be categorized quite simply: we start acting slavishly, rather than as free men.

    Nobody is stopping me, no one is interfering directly with me writing the emails I want to write. But again, thats the way of thinking about freedom superficially. Thats surface stuff.

    What were talking about is something much more fundamental, a democratic citizen thinking, Well, I dont know if I can really say this anymore . And thats the point: I dont know. Thats what it is to live like a slave in a certain domain: you dont know what might happen to you.

    And if never knowing what might happen to you is the lot of the slave, how can the free citizen guarantee that this never happens to herthat her free status is protected? By ensuring that she lives in a society with no arbitrary powers beyond her controlby ensuring that the rule of law applies in all circumstances, and that the law itself is a clear expression of the free citizens will.

    What this mandates is a particular form of a very active democratic citizenship as a condition of upholding freedom, but not as a condition of upholding freedom as being left alone to do whatever I want. The freedom that is being upheld is freedom from arbitrary power, because if youre not free from arbitrary power, you dont have freedom in this absolutely fundamental sense.

    Weve arrived, then, at the claim that safeguarding our civil liberties and protecting ourselves from the encroachment of arbitrary powers requires an active participation in the democratic process.

    Somehow, from ruminating on the precise motivations of celebrated Renaissance thinkers, were led to a core belief about the importance of civic action that you could easily imagine hearing at any Black Lives Matter protest.

    If thats not a palpable demonstration of the ongoing relevance of the history of ideas, Im not sure what is.

    Next page
    Light

    Font size:

    Reset

    Interval:

    Bookmark:

    Make

    Similar books «Quest for Freedom: A Conversation with Quentin Skinner»

    Look at similar books to Quest for Freedom: A Conversation with Quentin Skinner. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


    Reviews about «Quest for Freedom: A Conversation with Quentin Skinner»

    Discussion, reviews of the book Quest for Freedom: A Conversation with Quentin Skinner and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.