• Complain

T. Scott Womble - Bringing the Depths Into Focus: Engaging Difficulties in Biblical Interpretation

Here you can read online T. Scott Womble - Bringing the Depths Into Focus: Engaging Difficulties in Biblical Interpretation full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2021, publisher: Wipf and Stock Publishers, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Bringing the Depths Into Focus: Engaging Difficulties in Biblical Interpretation
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Wipf and Stock Publishers
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2021
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Bringing the Depths Into Focus: Engaging Difficulties in Biblical Interpretation: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Bringing the Depths Into Focus: Engaging Difficulties in Biblical Interpretation" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The Bible is a frustrating book to many Christians. Its not uncommon to hear that its difficult to understand. To complicate the matter, we live in a culture that dismisses the importance of Gods word altogether and we are left to wonder if Scripture has lost its impact. At a time when the world needs the wisdom of Gods word, many are skeptical as to why they should bother reading the Bible at all.
Scott Womble brings hope to this bleak situation by showing how we can not only learn to read and interpret the Bible more skillfully, but also enjoy our time in study. In addition to discussing critical issues such as literary context, genre identification, and background study, Womble breaks new ground by encouraging us to both hear and see the text (semiotics). This incorporation of semiotics into the interpretive process helps us more fully interact with the word.
While sound interpretation is of great importance, the end goal of Bible reading is application. For Womble, this is the crux of the matter. Scanning prominent theories of application and concluding with seven guidelines, this book is sure to help Jesus followers become more intentional doers of the word.

T. Scott Womble: author's other books


Who wrote Bringing the Depths Into Focus: Engaging Difficulties in Biblical Interpretation? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Bringing the Depths Into Focus: Engaging Difficulties in Biblical Interpretation — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Bringing the Depths Into Focus: Engaging Difficulties in Biblical Interpretation" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Bringing the Depths into Focus

Engaging Difficulties in Biblical Interpretation

T. Scott Womble

Foreword by Leonard Sweet

Bringing the Depths into Focus Engaging Difficulties in Biblical - photo 1

Bringing the Depths into Focus

Engaging Difficulties in Biblical Interpretation

Copyright 2021 T. Scott Womble. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in critical publications or reviews, no part of this book may be reproduced in any manner without prior written permission from the publisher. Write: Permissions, Wipf and Stock Publishers, W. th Ave., Suite , Eugene, OR 97401 .

Wipf & Stock

An Imprint of Wipf and Stock Publishers

W. th Ave., Suite

Eugene, OR 97401

www.wipfandstock.com

paperback isbn: 978-1-6667-1670-2

hardcover isbn: 978-1-6667-1671-9

ebook isbn: 978-1-6667-1672-6

New American Standard Bible (NASB), Copyright 1960 , 1962 , 1963 , 1968 , 1971 , 1972 , 1973 , 1975 , 1977 , 1995 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission. www.Lockman.org.

08/20/21

For my grandchildren Elaina, Vivian, Asa, Ezra, and Jordan

may the Word of God be a light unto your path.

Foreword

C ulture is a language. Learning to read that language is what is called semiotics. We are perpetually signaling our intentions toward one another and expecting those signals to be picked up, translated, and processed. Growing up is learning to read that signaling. Since % of communication is nonverbal (facial expression, body language, energy flow, etc.) everyone needs semiotic training. Thats why, in a sense, to breathe is to be a semiotician.

Reading The Times is not the same thing as reading The New York Times. It takes more than cable news or The New York Times to hear what the Spirit is saying to the churches (Rev :). In fact, in some ways these rolling news feeds and noisy notifications are hindrances more than helps. It takes prayer, study, discipline, silence, praise, and worship to connect the red-skiy to the blue-heaven. A biblical semiotics mandates a pneumatological hermeneutics. The Spirit teaches us how to read the signs. As Scott Womble seamlessly and subtly weaves throughout this book, a Jesus semiotics requires a Spirit hermeneutics.

Jesus answered hermeneutic questions with semiotic stories. For example, when quizzed about how his followers should handle Caesar, especially the payment of taxes, Jesus answered the question with a question. Whats in your pocket? They pulled out a coin. What image is on that coin? Caesars image, they replied. Bingo, Jesus said, or something like that. Give to Caesar whats Caesars and give to God whats Gods. In other words, Caesars image is on his coins, so give Caesar whats his: coinage. Gods image is in you, so give God whats Gods: YOU.

Or take the disciples query to Jesus in Luke : Increase our faith. Jesus, who had a nickname for each of the disciples Rocky, Bonarges (Sons of Thunder), Didymus (My Twin), etc. also has a nickname for them collectively: little faiths. When they ask how they might become big faith disciples, Jesus responds how? No three-point plan or draught of a blueprint. He gives them a semiotic story of a mustard seed: If you had the faith of a mustard seed, you could move a mulberry tree, or move mountains. Increase your trust in God, from little faiths to big faiths, and see the impossible happen.

Or for a showcase case-study of Jesus use of reframing and re-signing, read Luke :. Notice how Jesus story of the Good Samaritan is his response to a lawyer asking a lawyerly question but with Jesus inviting him to look at the same question from another frame to re-sign and recode his question. Our lives change, not when we read different things in the Bible but when we read the same things differently. Jesus didnt reject the past or reject the law, but re-framed re-coded, re-signed our reading of the past and refocused the lens by which we are to read the Scriptures. The same change happened to this lawyer in his exchange with Jesus.

Plants are masters of semiotics. When they are under attack, they immediately start sending signals of help and warning to neighboring foliage and fauna. They secrete hormones that trigger the release of compounds that gird up its immune system, and these hormones are invasion specific, depending on the insect. Not just on Avatar do plants communicate with each other.... They send biochemical messages via the root system, or they deploy symbiotic fungal connections in the soil. They also release chemicals in the air. These signs and signals of the Wood Wide Web are read by the whole forest family.

In the mountain culture where I grew up, they took seriously the signs of nature as described in Genesis :, : And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years... And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.

When springtime came you would wait to plant your crops until, in Appalachian phraseology, the signs is right. A planting by the signs is based on the reading of the signs and seasons: plant crops that will produce their fruits above the ground during the waxing moon (the time between a new moon and a full moon, when the moon is getting bigger), while plants that produce their crop below the ground must be planted during a waning moon (the time between a full moon and a new moon, when the moon is shrinking).

You dont get a drivers license without passing a semiotics test: a drivers test is all about reading the signs of the highway. Semiotics requires intense workouts of cerebral muscle, both right and left brain. One of the hardest things for a computer to learn is reading signs, the one piece missing so long in the development of self-driving vehicles.

Scott Wombles book is an indispensable drivers manual for better sign-reading, both as semiotics and hermeneutics. Dont leave home without it.

Leonard Sweet

George Fox University

Drew University

Tabor College Evangelical Seminary

Acknowledgments

M any people were willing to sacrifice their time so that I could bring this project to the finish line. Id like to thank the following: Norma Baker, Penny Shadow, Jeff Miller, Kevin Vanhoozer, Jack Kuhatschek, Leonard Sweet, and my wife Lisa. Their input was indispensable and greatly appreciated.

Id also like to thank Ron Oakes for providing me the opportunity to teach at St. Louis Christian College. Back in 2001 , Ron gave me a tremendous gift that keeps givingthe assignment to teach hermeneutics. Its a course I never grow tired of teaching.

Over the years, Ive had a lot of great teachers. Without their willingness to pour into students, I would never have been able to write this book. Im forever indebted to their service. In particular, Id like to acknowledge the contributions of Robert Kurka, William Baker, Robert Lowery, Gary Hall, and Leonard Sweet. While three of these godly men are now with the Lord, their contribution to the kingdom persists through their students.

Finally, Id like to thank my students who have made teaching hermeneutics so enjoyable over the years. Its their eagerness to learn that stokes the fire and challenges me to keep refining my own interpretive skills.

Introduction

I love to laugh. In fact, I love to laugh so much that I actually try to watch a sitcom every day. I probably dont want to know how many times Ive watched Frasier , Wings , The Office , and my personal favorite, Seinfeld . Besides its outlandish and very clever story lines, Seinfeld is well-known for its long list of great side characters. The very mention of guys like Frank Costanza, Uncle Leo, David Puddy, Kenny Bania, or Jackie Chiles gets me laughing.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Bringing the Depths Into Focus: Engaging Difficulties in Biblical Interpretation»

Look at similar books to Bringing the Depths Into Focus: Engaging Difficulties in Biblical Interpretation. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Bringing the Depths Into Focus: Engaging Difficulties in Biblical Interpretation»

Discussion, reviews of the book Bringing the Depths Into Focus: Engaging Difficulties in Biblical Interpretation and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.