• Complain

Charles Fernyhough - Pieces of Light: How the New Science of Memory Illuminates the Stories We Tell About Our Pasts

Here you can read online Charles Fernyhough - Pieces of Light: How the New Science of Memory Illuminates the Stories We Tell About Our Pasts full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2013, publisher: Harper, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Charles Fernyhough Pieces of Light: How the New Science of Memory Illuminates the Stories We Tell About Our Pasts
  • Book:
    Pieces of Light: How the New Science of Memory Illuminates the Stories We Tell About Our Pasts
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Harper
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2013
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Pieces of Light: How the New Science of Memory Illuminates the Stories We Tell About Our Pasts: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Pieces of Light: How the New Science of Memory Illuminates the Stories We Tell About Our Pasts" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Leading psychologist Charles Fernyhough blends the most current science with literature and personal stories in Pieces of Light: How the New Science of Memory Illuminates the Stories We Tell About Our Pasts.A new consensus is emerging among cognitive scientists: rather than possessing fixed, unchanging memories, they have found that we create recollections anew each time we are called upon to remember. According to psychologist Charles Fernyhough, remembering is an act of narrative imagination as much as it is the product of a neurological process.An NPR and Psychology Today contributor, Dr. Fernyhough guides readers through the fascinating new science of autobiographical memory, covering topics such as: navigation, imagination, and the power of sense associations to cue remembering. Exquisitely written and meticulously researched, Pieces of Light brings together science and literature, the ordinary and the extraordinary, to help us better understand our powers of recall and our relationship with the past.

Charles Fernyhough: author's other books


Who wrote Pieces of Light: How the New Science of Memory Illuminates the Stories We Tell About Our Pasts? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Pieces of Light: How the New Science of Memory Illuminates the Stories We Tell About Our Pasts — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Pieces of Light: How the New Science of Memory Illuminates the Stories We Tell About Our Pasts" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
For Martha George CONTENTS CAN YOU REMEMBER It starts with a question from - photo 1

For Martha George

CONTENTS

CAN YOU REMEMBER?

It starts with a question from my seven-year-old son. We are on the grounds of our rented cottage in the Baixa Alentejo, killing time before we head to the Algarve coast for a boat trip. With his holiday money, Isaac has bought himself a handheld toy that fires little foam rockets prodigious distances up into the air, and he has lost one of them on the graveled ground behind the swimming pool. As we search, he has been chattering away about how he wants to go fishing with me when we get home from Portugal. I have told him that I used to go fishing, as a child of about his age, with my uncle in the lake in the grounds of my grandparents house in Essex. Then, out of the blue, he asks the question:

Can you remember the first fish you ever caught?

I stand straight and look out at the farmland that slopes away from our hillside vantage point. I have not been fishing in thirty-five years, but my thoughts have occasionally returned to my outings with my uncle. When they do, certain images rise out of the past. I can picture the greenish lake with its little island in the middle, how mysterious and unreachable that weeping-willowed outcrop looked to my small-scale imaginings. I can sense my jocular young uncle next to me, his stretches of silence punctuated with kindly teasing. I remember the feel of the crustless bits of white bread soaked in pond water that we used to squidge onto the fishhooks as bait, and the excitement (for a keen young amateur naturalist) of an afternoon visitation from a stoat, scurrying along by the bullrushes with its black-tipped tail bobbing. I remember the weird, faintly gruesome exercise of extracting the hook from a rudds mouth and then throwing the muscular sliver back into the lake to restart its perforated life. But I have never thought about the moment of feeling the tug on the line, the thrill that prefigured the landing of a fish. And I have certainly not had the question framed like this, narrowing my remembering down to the first time it ever happened.

I dont know, I reply. I think so.

What accounts for my uncertainty? The image of lifting a fish from the water was not there in my collection of ready-made fishing memories. Because I have never (as far as I can remember) been asked this question, I have never had to come up with a corresponding memory. But I try. I ask myself: What would that first-catch moment look like? Into the well-remembered scene of the lake I insert the detail of an extended fishing rod, seen from the perspective of my childhood self, with something silvery dangling from the end of the line. I feel a pang of recognition, and then a shiver of boyish excitement. And then I ask myself: Did it happen? I feel that it did. It seems to me that the event really took place; it feels as though it belongs in the past; it comes with appropriate corresponding emotions; and it feels as though it happened to me rather than to anyone else. When I think of the memory now, a month or two after our conversation in Portugal, it has taken on an independent existence. I no longer agonize about whether it was a product of imagination, generated on demand to satisfy a small childs curiosity.

What is it like to have a memory? What is a memory? How is it possible to have new memories, like this one of catching my first fish? Have I always had the memory, but only just unearthed it, or have I somehow created it out of something else? What about all the other potential memories I could conjure up from that period of my lifethose that are not in my consciousness right now, but that could become so, with the appropriate cues? Do I have them or not? What status do they have, before and after they come into my mind?

The list of questions goes on. Why did I remember this particular event and not some other? Presumably it was because my memory was clearly cued. I remembered the first fish I caught because I was specifically asked about it. But what about when a memory simply pops into my head for no apparent reason? Yesterday, for example, I suddenly had an exasperatingly random memory of the little blue-and-white-striped plastic carrier bags that were common when I was a child. We are often struck by the randomness of what we remember, and dismayed by our forgetfulness for the really important stuff. In the words of the American writer Austin OMalley, memory is a crazy woman that hoards colored rags and throws away food. This randomness determines what information we choose to encode about an experience, how we recall what we do actually store, and the triggers that can elicit such memories. Memories that are resistant to the ordinary processes of cueing might nevertheless be flushed out by trivial, apparently disconnected cues. Even spontaneous memories, which flash into our heads for no apparent reason, may be triggered by some subtle internal or external connections.

For all these reasons, its impossible to answer the question of whether I had my first-catch memory before Isaac asked me about it. In this book, I want to show that the question is impossible because it relies on a mistaken view of what memories are.

HERES A MEMORY, FROM AN accomplished writer with a special interest in the topic:

It is seen from the point of view of a small person just seeing over the wall of a playground in East Hardwick Elementary School. The stone is hot, and is that kind that flakes into gold slivers. The sun is very bright. There is a tree overhead, and the leaves catch the light and are golden, and in the shade they are blue-green. Over the wall, and across the road, is a field full of daisies and buttercups and speedwell and shepherds-purse. On the horizon are trees with thick trunks and solid branches. The sky is very blue and the sun is huge. The child thinks: I am always going to remember this. Then she thinks: why this and not another thing? Then she thinks: what is remembering? This is the point where my self then and my self now confuse themselves into one. I know I have added to this Memory every time I have thought about it, or brought it out to look at it... It has got both further away and brighter, more and less real.

The writer is the novelist A. S. Byatt. The Memory, as she dubs it, is an example of an autobiographical memory , which psychologists define as those acts of remembering that relate to events and details from our own lives. You could call on anyone to recount a memory from their childhood, and they would come up with something like this. At one level, Byatts account illustrates the predominant view of what a memory is: a more or less stable depiction of a past event. Memories are not always as accessible as we might likethey dont always come when they are calledbut they are essentially enduring representations that you carry with you, claim as your own and guard jealously. Some remember their first day at school, first kiss or first wedding day, and some dont. No one would doubt, though, that the question of whether you possess a particular memory makes sense.

It could surely not be otherwise. Without our memories, we would be lost to ourselves, amnesiacs flailing around in a constant, unrelenting present. It is hard to imagine being able to hang on to your personal identity without a store of autobiographical memories. To attain the kind of consciousness we all enjoy, we probably rely on a capacity to make links between our past, present and future selves. Memory shapes everything that our minds do. Our perceptions are funneled by information that we laid down in the past. Our thinking relies on short-term and long-term storage of information. As many artists have noted, memory underpins imagination. Creating new artistic and intellectual works depends critically on the reshaping of what has gone before. We need our memories, and we find ways of hanging on to them. According to the conventional possession view of memory, we do that by filing them away in a kind of internal library, ready to be retrieved as soon as they are needed.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Pieces of Light: How the New Science of Memory Illuminates the Stories We Tell About Our Pasts»

Look at similar books to Pieces of Light: How the New Science of Memory Illuminates the Stories We Tell About Our Pasts. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Pieces of Light: How the New Science of Memory Illuminates the Stories We Tell About Our Pasts»

Discussion, reviews of the book Pieces of Light: How the New Science of Memory Illuminates the Stories We Tell About Our Pasts and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.