• Complain

Fort Charles - Authors of the impossible : the paranormal and the sacred

Here you can read online Fort Charles - Authors of the impossible : the paranormal and the sacred full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Chicago, London, year: 2011,2010, publisher: The University of Chicago Press, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Fort Charles Authors of the impossible : the paranormal and the sacred

Authors of the impossible : the paranormal and the sacred: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Authors of the impossible : the paranormal and the sacred" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Most scholars dismiss research into the paranormal as pseudoscience, a frivolous pursuit for the paranoid or gullible. Even historians of religion, whose work naturally attends to events beyond the realm of empirical science, have shown scant interest in the subject. But the history of psychical phenomena, Jeffrey J. Kripal contends, is an untapped source of insight into the sacred and by tracing that history through the last two centuries of Western thought we can see its potential centrality to the critical study of religion.
Kripal grounds his study in the work of four major figures in the history of paranormal research: psychical researcher Frederic Myers; writer and humorist Charles Fort; astronomer, computer scientist, and ufologist Jacques Vallee; and philosopher and sociologist Bertrand Mheust. Through incisive analyses of these thinkers, Kripal ushers the reader into a beguiling world somewhere between fact, fiction, and fraud. The cultural history of telepathy, teleportation, and UFOs; a ghostly love story; the occult dimensions of science fiction; cold war psychic espionage; galactic colonialism; and the intimate relationship between consciousness and culture all come together in Authors of the Impossible, a dazzling and profound look at how the paranormal bridges the sacred and the scientific.

Fort Charles: author's other books


Who wrote Authors of the impossible : the paranormal and the sacred? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Authors of the impossible : the paranormal and the sacred — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Authors of the impossible : the paranormal and the sacred" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

AUTHORS OF THE IMPOSSIBLE

The Paranormal and the Sacred

JEFFREY J. KRIPAL

THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS

CHICAGO AND LONDON

The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637

The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London

2010 by The University of Chicago

All rights reserved. Published 2010.

Paperback edition 2011

Printed in the United States of America

20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 2 3 4 5 6

ISBN-13: 978-0-226-45386-6 (cloth)

ISBN-10: 0-226-45386-3 (cloth)

ISBN-13: 978-0-226-45387-3 (paper)

ISBN-10: 0-226-45387-1 (paper)

ISBN-13: 978-0-226-45389-7 (e-book)

Frontispiece: Ailleurs (circa 1960) by Arthur-Maria Rener (191291). Vallee private collection, hanging over the Vallee-Hynek parapsychological library. Used with permission.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data:

Kripal, Jeffrey John, 1962

Authors of the impossible : the paranormal and the sacred / Jeffrey J. Kripal.

p. cm.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

ISBN-13: 978-0-226-45386-6 (cloth: alk. paper)

ISBN-10: 0-226-45386-3 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. ParapsychologyHistory. 2. ReligionPsychic aspects. 3. Myers, Frederic William Henry, 18431901. 4. Society for Psychical Research (Great Britain) 5. Fort, Charles, 18741932. I. Title.

BF1028.K75 2010

130dc22

2009029969

Picture 1 This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper).

for David

for taking many chances on an aspiring author of the impossible who has tried his best not to become an impossible author

Read a book, or look at a picture. The composer has taken a wild talent that nobody else in the world believed in; a thing that came and went and flouted and deceived him; maybe starved him; almost ruined himand has put that damn thing to work.

CHARLES FORT, Wild Talents

DIMENSIONS

.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

All things cut an umbilical cord only to clutch a breast.

CHARLES FORT, The Book of the Damned

Professionally speaking, ones intellectual and personal debts are inscribed in ones footnotes, but such secreted allusions seldom carry the full force of all those connections of person, place, and project that make a work of scholarship finally pop into view. Nor, alas, do long lists of names on an acknowledgments page. So I will try to write sentences here, and keep things short and to the point, which is to say, to the person.

The book is dedicated to T. David Brent, the editor of all six of my Chicago monographs (the sixth still coming to be). I do not underestimate, and I cannot overestimate, what David and the presss support have meant to me over the years, both those of the past and those spread out into the future (for publishing books is very much about the future). I mean every word of the dedication, and then some.

Michael Murphy and the Esalen Institutes Center for Theory and Research have generously supported an annual symposia series that I conceived and subsequently direct on the paranormal and popular culture in Big Sur each May. The latter is part of Esalens Sursem research group on postmortem survival, of which I am deeply honored to be a part. Much of the talent of these two symposia series, and particularly Sursem, is represented in the pages that follow. Of special note are Stephen Braude, Adam Crabtree, Edward Kelly, Emily Williams Kelly, Dean Radin, Russell Targ, and Charles Tart.

Two of my four authors of the impossible, Jacques Vallee and Bertrand Mheust, also deserve special mention. Jacques went out of his way to welcome me into the inner sanctum of his home and library, shared with me many unpublished materials and secret stories, and responded to my thoughts about his work with helpful criticism and further insight. Bertrand was gracious and patient with an American English speaker struggling through thousands of pages of his erudite French. He even went so far as to declare what were clear translation errors on my part philosophical insights. This was very flattering. And very funny. Ive fixed those errors. The reader can draw his or her own conclusion about what that means. I have also laughed a great deal with Bertrand, mostly in Big Sur, where he was once attacked by the dreaded black Spider-Man. That was very funny too. I deny everything.

I must also mention Victoria Nelson, whose work in The Secret Life of Puppets (Harvard, 2001) played a special role in the inspirationit is really more of an uncanny hauntingfor this book. Vicki has been a constant source of support, advice, and mind-bogglingly detailed editorial help. She also helped introduce me to other academics and professional writers more or less secretly working on such matters. One of the main goals of the present work is to help create a safe, or at least a safer, intellectual space within the humanities and the arts so that such writers working off the page can come back on the page and enlighten us about the deeper dialectics of consciousness and culture.

In terms of the Fort materials, I must thank Jim Steinmeyer, Forts recent talented biographer. Fort is a veritable ocean in which one can easily get lost and drown. Jims biography came at a crucial time for me and showed me my own way through the waves and fishes. The following individuals have also played key roles in one way or another: Kelly Bulkeley, who generously described (or compassionately lied about) my treatment of the neuroscientific materials as just right; Brenda Denzler, who taught me about the history of ufology and the professional costs involved in such anomalous interests; David Hufford, who taught me that materialism and rationalism are not the same thing, at all; Chad Pevateaux, my graduate student who has accomplished innumerable source-checking, editing, and indexing tasks for me with his usual Derridean verve and Blakean grace; and Jody Radzik, whose nondual experiences have long functioned for me as a kind of living mirror in which I can catch a fleeting glimpse of my own X. Thank you all.

Finally, I must thank Scott Jones of XL Films. XL Films has optioned this book for a feature documentary now in process. Scott showed great enthusiasm for the cinematic potentials of my thought and is presently teaching me that the paranormal mysteries of reading and writing extend into the acts of viewing and seeing as well. We are back to Platos Cave and those shadows of social, historical, and religious truth projected on the cave wall now called a theater screen. Happily, there is also a way out of the cavelike theatre, always, of course, through that back door and sticky floor behind the projector.

Only spilled soda pop and bad carpet block our way out now...

An Impossible Opening

THE MAGICAL POLITICS OF BOBBY KENNEDY

A dear friend, a great scientist, now dead, used to tease me by saying that because politics is the art of the possible, it appeals only to second-rate minds. The first-raters, he claimed, were only interested in the impossible.

ARTHUR C. CLARKE, The Fountain of Paradise

An opening is a beginning, but it is also a hole.

I want to open with a story that could not have possibly happened, which happened. I have chosen this story carefully. It is neither abstract nor distant to me. I know the central visionary well and can vouch for his complete integrity and honesty. I have absolutely no doubt that this event happened to this individual as described below. What it, and countless other stories like it, mean is quite another matter. Which is why I wrote this book.

I will suggest no adequate explanation for this impossible possibility. The simple truth is that I do not have one. Nor, I suspect, do you, or anyone else for that matter, other than, of course, the professional debunker, whose ideological denials boil down to the claim that such things never happened or, if they did, that they are just anecdotes unworthy of our serious attention and careful thought. Such mock rationalisms, such defense mechanisms, such cowardly refusals to think before the abyss will win nothing here but my own mocking laughter. Each of us, after all, is just such an irreducible, unrepeatable, unquantifiable Anecdote.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Authors of the impossible : the paranormal and the sacred»

Look at similar books to Authors of the impossible : the paranormal and the sacred. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Authors of the impossible : the paranormal and the sacred»

Discussion, reviews of the book Authors of the impossible : the paranormal and the sacred and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.