• Complain

James A. Herrick - The Radical Rhetoric of the English Deists: The Discourse of Skepticism, 1680-1750 (Studies in Rhetoric Communication)

Here you can read online James A. Herrick - The Radical Rhetoric of the English Deists: The Discourse of Skepticism, 1680-1750 (Studies in Rhetoric Communication) full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 1997, publisher: University of South Carolina Press, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    The Radical Rhetoric of the English Deists: The Discourse of Skepticism, 1680-1750 (Studies in Rhetoric Communication)
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    University of South Carolina Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    1997
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Radical Rhetoric of the English Deists: The Discourse of Skepticism, 1680-1750 (Studies in Rhetoric Communication): summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Radical Rhetoric of the English Deists: The Discourse of Skepticism, 1680-1750 (Studies in Rhetoric Communication)" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

James A. Herrick: author's other books


Who wrote The Radical Rhetoric of the English Deists: The Discourse of Skepticism, 1680-1750 (Studies in Rhetoric Communication)? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Radical Rhetoric of the English Deists: The Discourse of Skepticism, 1680-1750 (Studies in Rhetoric Communication) — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Radical Rhetoric of the English Deists: The Discourse of Skepticism, 1680-1750 (Studies in Rhetoric Communication)" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
title The Radical Rhetoric of the English Deists The Discourse of - photo 1

title:The Radical Rhetoric of the English Deists : The Discourse of Skepticism, 1680-1750 Studies in Rhetoric/communication
author:Herrick, James A.
publisher:University of South Carolina Press
isbn10 | asin:1570031665
print isbn13:9781570031663
ebook isbn13:9780585350653
language:English
subjectDeism--Great Britain--History.
publication date:1997
lcc:BL2765.G7H47 1997eb
ddc:211/.5/0941
subject:Deism--Great Britain--History.
Page i
The Radical Rhetoric of the English Deists
Page ii
Studies in Rhetoric/Communication
Thomas W. Benson, Series Editor
Page iii
The Radical Rhetoric of the English Deists
The Discourse of Skepticism, 16801750
James A. Herrick
Page iv 1997 University of South Carolina Published in Columbia South - photo 2
Page iv
1997 University of South Carolina
Published in Columbia, South Carolina, by the
University of South Carolina Press
Manufactured in the United States of America
01 00 99 98 97 5 4 3 2 1
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Herrick, James A.
The radical rhetoric of the English Deists : the discourse of
skepticism, 16801750 / James A. Herrick.
p. cm. (Studies in rhetoric/communication)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 1-57003-166-5
1. DeismGreat BritainHistory. I. Title. II. Series.
BL2765.G7H47 1997
211'.5'0941dc21 97-4864
Page v
Contents
Editor's Preface
vii
Acknowledgments
ix
1. The Social and Religious Context of the Deist Controversy
1
2. Characteristics of British Deism
23
3. The Rhetoric of Subterfuge and Characterization
51
4. The Rhetorical Career of Thomas Woolston
77
5. Tolerance, Expression, and Prosecution
103
6. Peter Annet: Radical Deism in the 1740s
125
7. Reason, Revelation, and Miracle: The Christian Response
145
8. Miracles and Method in Christian Apologetic
161
9. The Religious Rhetoric of Jacob Ilive
181
10. Conclusion
205
Notes
213
Bibliography
223
Index
237

Page vii
Editor's Preface
In The Radical Rhetoric of the English Deists, James Herrick of Hope College presents the first full length rhetorical study of a remarkable group of controversialists. The English Deists of the seventeenth and eighteenth century engaged in a heated, high-stakes public debate with defenders of traditional religious doctrines. Herrick demonstrates that the doctrines of the Deists, though highly varied, are best understood as rhetoricthat is, as addressed to readers in a particular historical circumstance and in the context of a bitter public controversy.
The Deists argued that religion must be based on free, critical rationality and that any doctrine that could not hold up to rational inspection was untenable. From the advocacy of rationality in religious reflection, the Deists concluded that religious thinking must be free of coercion, intolerance, and violence. If all true religion is based on what is evident to common reason, then it follows, argued the Deists, that any religion, and not exclusively Christianity, has a claim to spiritual truth. The Deists typically rejected the Bible, which they regarded as exclusive and restricted. Priests and priestcraft were rejected as self-serving mystification. Miracles were rejected as incompatible with reason and experience. An important cultural legacy of the Deists is their early work in biblical criticism, which, according to Herrick, is in itself a considerable achievement, but an invention that is more strategic and rhetorical than scholarly.
The radical English Deists were indefatigable arguers, using a powerful arsenal of reason and ridicule to attack established religion. They were met by a sustained counterattack from the defenders of religion. Professor Herrick engages in a detailed analysis of the rhetorics of leaders and debaters on both sides. The form and consequences of Deism were part of a larger social upheaval in which the power of a conservative class was under challenge. Because they were in a position of genuine risk, the Deists, according to Herrick, typically disguised or outright
Page viii
lied about their own religious views, pretending, for strategic reasons, to loyalty to a Christianity in which they did not actually believe. Because of the class antagonisms that were an inseparable part of the Deist controversy, the debate over religion spilled over into a more general political debate.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Radical Rhetoric of the English Deists: The Discourse of Skepticism, 1680-1750 (Studies in Rhetoric Communication)»

Look at similar books to The Radical Rhetoric of the English Deists: The Discourse of Skepticism, 1680-1750 (Studies in Rhetoric Communication). We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Radical Rhetoric of the English Deists: The Discourse of Skepticism, 1680-1750 (Studies in Rhetoric Communication)»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Radical Rhetoric of the English Deists: The Discourse of Skepticism, 1680-1750 (Studies in Rhetoric Communication) and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.