• Complain

John H. Stone - A Clinicians Pearls & Myths in Rheumatology

Here you can read online John H. Stone - A Clinicians Pearls & Myths in Rheumatology full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2009, publisher: Springer Science & Business Media, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

John H. Stone A Clinicians Pearls & Myths in Rheumatology
  • Book:
    A Clinicians Pearls & Myths in Rheumatology
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Springer Science & Business Media
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2009
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

A Clinicians Pearls & Myths in Rheumatology: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "A Clinicians Pearls & Myths in Rheumatology" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Important strides have been made in understanding the pathophysiologic basis of many inflammatory conditions in recent years, but rheumatology remains a discipline in which diagnosis is rooted in the medical history skillfully extracted from the patient, the careful physical examination, and the discriminating use of laboratory tests and imaging. Moreover, selection of the most appropriate therapy for patients with rheumatic diseases also remains heavily reliant upon clinical experience. Medical disciplines such as rheumatology that depend significantly upon clinical wisdom are prone to the development of systems of Pearls and Myths, related to the diseases they call their own, a Pearl being a nugget of truth about the diagnosis or treatment of a particular disease that has been gained by dint of clinical experience and a Myth being a commonly held belief that influences the practice of many clinicians but is false. This book will pool together the clinical wisdom of seasoned, expert rheumatologists who participate in the care of patients with autoimmune diseases, systemic inflammatory disorders, and all other rheumatic conditions.

John H. Stone: author's other books


Who wrote A Clinicians Pearls & Myths in Rheumatology? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

A Clinicians Pearls & Myths in Rheumatology — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "A Clinicians Pearls & Myths in Rheumatology" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
John H. Stone (ed.) A Clinician's Pearls and Myths in Rheumatology 10.1007/978-1-84800-934-9_1 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009
1. Rheumatoid Arthritis
James R. O'Dell 1, Josef S. Smolen 2, Daniel Aletaha 2, Dwight R. Robinson and E. William St. Clair 3
(1)
Department of Internal Medicine Omaha, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska, 68198-3025, USA
(2)
Department of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 1820, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
(3)
Medicine Department, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3874 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects all ethnic groups. Women are nearly three times more likely than men to develop the disease. The pattern of arthritis typically favors distal and symmetrical involvement. The most commonly involved joints are the wrists, metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, and metatarsophalangeal joints. However, many other joints can also be involved. Shoulder, elbow, hip, knee, or neck disease (particularly at the atlanto-axial joint, C1C2) are frequently observed. Most presentations are subacute in nature, with the insidious onset of fatigue, morning stiffness, and arthritis. More explosive onsets of disease are also described. If untreated, RA is a chronic, progressive disorder that leads to joint damage, disability, and early mortality. A variety of extraarticular features are typical of seropositive RA (RA associated with the presence of rheumatoid factor in the serum). These include rheumatoid nodules, secondary Sjgren's syndrome, interstitial lung disease, scleritis, and rheumatoid vasculitis. Approximately 70% of patients with RA are rheumatoid factor positive. An approximately equal percentage has antibodies directed against cyclic citrullinated peptides (i.e., anti-CCP antibodies). There is substantial but not complete overlap between groups of patients who are rheumatoid factor positive and those who have anti-CCP antibodies. Some patients have RA that appears in every way to be typical disease yet do not have either rheumatoid factor or anti-CCP antibodies. These patients are said to have seronegative RA. Radiographic studies in RA reveal joint space narrowing, erosions, deformities, and periarticular osteopenia. Treatment approaches now emphasize early interventions designed to suppress joint inflammation entirely as soon as possible after the onset of clinical disease.
1.1 Overview of Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects all ethnic groups. Women are nearly three times more likely than men to develop the disease.
  • The pattern of arthritis typically favors distal and symmetrical involvement.
  • The most commonly involved joints are the wrists, metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, and metatarsophalangeal joints. However, many other joints can also be involved. Shoulder, elbow, hip, knee, or neck disease (particularly at the atlanto-axial joint, C1C2) are frequently observed.
  • Most presentations are subacute in nature, with the insidious onset of fatigue, morning stiffness, and arthritis. More explosive onsets of disease are also described.
  • If untreated, RA is a chronic, progressive disorder that leads to joint damage, disability, and early mortality.
  • A variety of extraarticular features are typical of seropositive RA (RA associated with the presence of rheumatoid factor in the serum). These include rheumatoid nodules, secondary Sjgren's syndrome, interstitial lung disease, scleritis, and rheumatoid vasculitis.
  • Approximately 70% of patients with RA are rheumatoid factor positive. An approximately equal percentage has antibodies directed against cyclic citrullinated peptides (i.e., anti-CCP antibodies). There is substantial but not complete overlap between groups of patients who are rheumatoid factor positive and those who have anti-CCP antibodies.
  • Some patients have RA that appears in every way to be typical disease yet do not have either rheumatoid factor or anti-CCP antibodies. These patients are said to have seronegative RA.
  • Radiographic studies in RA reveal joint space narrowing, erosions, deformities, and periarticular osteopenia.
  • Treatment approaches now emphasize early interventions designed to suppress joint inflammation entirely as soon as possible after the onset of clinical disease.
1.1.1 Diagnosis
Myth: A patient must fulfill at least four of the seven American Rheumatism Association (now called the American College of Rheumatology; ACR) classification criteria to be diagnosed as having rheumatoid arthritis (RA) .
Reality : Diagnostic criteria do not exist for RA. The ACR classification criteria developed in 1987 were not intended for the purpose of diagnosing individual patients, but rather for defining patient populations that are comparable across different clinical studies (Table ).
Table 1.1
1987 Revised ARA criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis
For classification purposes, a patient is said to have RA if he or she has satisfied at least four of the following seven criteria. Criteria 14 must have been present for at least 6 weeks. Patients with two clinical diagnoses are not excluded. Designation as classic, definite, or probable RA is not to be made
1. Morning stiffness
Morning stiffness in and around the joints, lasting at least 1 h before maximal improvement
2. Arthritis of three or more joint areas
At least 3 joint areas simultaneously have had soft tissue swelling or fluid (not bony overgrowth alone) observed by a physician; the 14 possible joint areas are right or left proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, wrist, elbow, knee, ankle, and metatarsophalangeal (MPT) joints
3. Arthritis of hand joints
At least 1 area swollen (as defined above) in a wrist, MCP or PIP joint
4. Symmetric arthritis
Simultaneous involvement of the same joint areas (see 2 above) on both sides of the body (bilateral involvement of PIPs, MCPs, or MTPs is acceptable without absolute symmetry)
5. Rheumatoid nodules
Subcutaneous nodules, over bony prominences, or extensor surfaces, or in juxta-articular regions, observed by a physician
6. Serum rheumatoid factor
Demonstration of abnormal amounts of serum rheumatoid factor by any method for which the result has been positive in <5% of normal control subjects
7. Radiographic changes
Radiographic changes typical of RA on posteroanterior hand and wrist radiographs, which must include erosions or unequivocal bony decalcification localized to or most marked adjacent to the involved joints (osteoarthritis changes alone do not qualify)
In addition, the RA classification criteria were developed in patients with established RA, not in patients with early inflammatory arthritis. Thus, they have limited applicability for classifying patients with early disease, who may lack several of the relevant criteria (e.g., erosions or rheumatoid nodules) (Aletaha et al. ). The gold standard for the diagnosis of RA continues to be the clinical pronouncement by a rheumatologist.
1.1.2 Clinical Features
Myth: Rheumatoid arthritis patients rarely get gout .
Reality : Adequate data on this association are lacking, but this myth is almost certainly an artifact of mid-twentieth century RA treatment regimens. High-dose aspirin, a uricosuric agent, was used in majority of RA patients in that era. With the development of more effective treatment regimens for RA that do not involve high-dose aspirin, it is not rare to see the two diseases in the same patient.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «A Clinicians Pearls & Myths in Rheumatology»

Look at similar books to A Clinicians Pearls & Myths in Rheumatology. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «A Clinicians Pearls & Myths in Rheumatology»

Discussion, reviews of the book A Clinicians Pearls & Myths in Rheumatology and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.