The Value and Limits of Academic Speech
Free speech has been a historically volatile issue in higher education. In recent years, however, there has been a surge of progressive censorship on campus. This wave of censorship has been characterized by the explosive growth of such policies as trigger warnings for course materials; safe spaces where students are protected from speech they consider harmful or distressing; micro-aggression policies that often strongly discourage the use of words that might offend sensitive individuals; new bias-reporting programs that consist of different degrees of campus surveillance; the dis-invitation of a growing list of speakers, including many in the mainstream of American politics and values; and the prominent shouting down or disruption of speakers deemed inconsistent with progressive ideology. Not to be outdone, external forces on the right are now engaging in social media bullying of speakers and teachers whose views upset them.
The essays in this collection, written by prominent philosophers, political scientists, sociologists, and legal scholars, examine the issues at the forefront of the crisis of free speech in higher education. The contributors address the broader historical, cultural, legal, and normative contexts of the current crisis, and take care to analyze the role of due process in protecting academic freedom and individuals accused of misconduct. Additionally, the volume is unique in that it advances practical remedies to campus censorship, as the editors and many of the contributors have participated in movements to remedy limitations on free speech and open inquiry. The Value and Limits of Academic Speech will educate academic professionals and informed citizens about the phenomenon of progressive censorship and its implications for higher education and the republic.
Donald Alexander Downs is the Alexander Meiklejohn Professor of Political Science, Law, and Journalism at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and the Glenn B. and Cleone Orr Hawkins Professor of Political Science at the University. He is also the director and co-founder of the Universitys Wisconsin Center for the Study of Liberal Democracy.
Chris W. Surprenant is an associate professor of philosophy at the University of New Orleans, where he is the founding director of the Alexis de Tocqueville Project, an interdisciplinary center for research and programming focusing on issues at the intersection of ethics, individual freedom, and the law.
Routledge Studies in Contemporary Philosophy
101Formal Epistemology and Cartesian Skepticism
In Defense of Belief in the Natural World
Tomoji Shogenji
102Epistemic Rationality and Epistemic Normativity
Patrick Bondy
103From Rules to Meanings
New Essays on Inferentialism
Edited by Ondej Beran, Vojtch Kolman, and Ladislav Kore
104Toleration and Freedom from Harm
Liberalism Reconceived
Andrew Jason Cohen
105Voicing Dissent
The Ethics and Epistemology of Making Disagreement Public
Edited by Casey Rebecca Johnson
106New Directions in the Philosophy of Memory
Edited by Kourken Michaelian, Dorothea Debus, and Denis Perrin
107A Pragmatic Approach to Libertarian Free Will
John Lemos
108Consciousness and Physicalism
A Defense of a Research Program
Andreas Elpidorou and Guy Dove
109The Value and Limits of Academic Speech
Philosophical, Political, and Legal Perspectives
Edited by Donald Alexander Downs and Chris W. Surprenant
The Value and Limits of Academic Speech
Philosophical, Political, and Legal Perspectives
Edited by Donald Alexander Downs and Chris W. Surprenant
First published 2018
by Routledge
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017
and by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
2018 Taylor & Francis
The right of the editors to be identified as the authors of the editorial material, and of the authors for their individual chapters, has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
A catalog record for this book has been requested
ISBN: 978-1-138-47989-0 (hbk)
ISBN: 978-1-351-06450-7 (ebk)
Typeset in Sabon
by Apex CoVantage, LLC
Contents
DONALD ALEXANDER DOWNS AND CHRIS W. SURPRENANT
PETER SINGER
BRIAN LEITER
KEITH E. WHITTINGTON
JAMES R. STONER, JR.
JOHN HASNAS
JASON BRENNAN
ANDREW J. COHEN
MICHAEL JOEL KESSLER
SHANE D. COURTLAND
CHRISTINA EASTON
BURKAY T. OZTURK AND BOB FISCHER
FRANK FUREDI
EDWARD JOHNSON
EVAN GERSTMANN
J.K. MILES
ARIANNE SHAHVISI
RYAN MULDOON
SARAH CONLY
CALUM MILLER
RIMA NAJJAR KAPITAN
This publication volume would not have been possible without a generous grant from the Institute for Humane Studies at George Mason University. We are incredibly thankful for their support of this project and the scholars who have contributed to this volume, as well as their support for other scholars working on a wide range of projects in the area of free speech and open inquiry.
Donald Alexander Downs and Chris W. Surprenant
This book addresses a matter that has provoked much attention and debate in recent years: the status and fate of free speech, open inquiry, and academic freedom in higher education. While the recent string of inviting, and then either disinviting, protesting, or otherwise interfering with a controversial speaker being brought to campus has drawn public attention to this issue, at its heart is a more fundamental concern about the appropriate function (or functions) of colleges and universities as institutions and what types of rules or safeguards must be in place to allow them to fulfill this aim. In this discussion, we (the editors of this volume) are not impartial observers, having taken speech-libertarian positions in writing and action. But our motivation for gathering together this collection of essays is to draw more attention to a discussion that seems to be going in the wrong direction. And as advocates of free speech and intellectual diversity, we feel obligated to include a variety of points of view from respected scholars and practitioners whose diverse ideas can help citizens in liberal democracies come to more informed conclusions regarding the present controversy. Rather than staking out our own positions, in this Introduction we strive to place the debate in a broader historical context while addressing the major points raised by our contributors.
Most universities and colleges remain publicly committed to long-established liberal principles of academic freedom and freedom of speech. Princetons Keith E. Whittington captures the essence of what we will call the liberal model in his contribution to this volume: