• Complain

Salerno Joe - New Essays on the Knowability Paradox

Here you can read online Salerno Joe - New Essays on the Knowability Paradox full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2009, publisher: Oxford University Press, Incorporated, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    New Essays on the Knowability Paradox
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Oxford University Press, Incorporated
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2009
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

New Essays on the Knowability Paradox: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "New Essays on the Knowability Paradox" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

In 1945 Alonzo Church issued a pair of referee reports in which he anonymously conveyed to Frederic Fitch a surprising proof showing that wherever there is (empirical) ignorance there is also logically unknowable truth. Fitch published this and a generalization of the result in 1963. Ever since, philosophers have been attempting to understand the significance and address the counter-intuitiveness of this, the so-called paradox of knowability.This collection assembles Churchs referee reports, Fitchs 1963 paper, and nineteen new papers on the knowability paradox. The contributors include logicians and philosophers from three continents, many of whom have already made important contributions to the discussion of the problem. The volume contains a general introduction to the paradox and the background literature, and is divided into seven sections that roughly mark the central points of debate. The sections include the history of the paradox, Michael Dummetts constructivism, issues of paraconsistency, developments of modal and temporal logics, Cartesian restricted theories of truth, modal and mathematical fictionalism, and reconsiderations about how, and whether, we ought to construe an anti-realist theory of truth.

Salerno Joe: author's other books


Who wrote New Essays on the Knowability Paradox? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

New Essays on the Knowability Paradox — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "New Essays on the Knowability Paradox" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

NEW ESSAYS ON THE KNOWABILITY PARADOX

New Essays on the Knowability Paradox

Edited by
JOE SALERNO

New Essays on the Knowability Paradox - image 1

New Essays on the Knowability Paradox - image 2

Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6DP

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the Universitys objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in

Oxford New York

Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi
Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi
New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto

With offices in

Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece
Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore
South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam

Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press
in the UK and in certain other countries

Published in the United States
by Oxford University Press Inc., New York

the several contributors 2009

The moral rights of the authors have been asserted
Database right Oxford University Press (maker)

First published 2009

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above

You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover
and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer

British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data

Data available

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data

Data available

Typeset by Laserwords Private Limited, Chennai, India
Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by
Biddles Ltd., Kings Lynn, Norfolk

ISBN 9780199285495

1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2

for Rebecca

List of Contributors

Jc Beall is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Connecticut, and Arch Associate Fellow at the University of St Andrews.

Johan van Benthem is University Professor of Logic at the University of Amsterdam and Professor of Philosophy at Stanford University.

JosLuis Bermdez is Professor and Director of Philosophy, Neuroscience and Psychology at Washington University in Saint Louis.

Berit Brogaard is Research Fellow at the RSSS Philosophy Program and Centre for Consciousness at the Australian National University, and Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Missouri-Saint Louis.

Otvio Bueno is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Miami.

John Burgess is Professor of Philosophy at Princeton University.

Alonzo Church was Associate Professor of Mathematics (without tenure) at Princeton University when his contribution to this volume was written in 1945. He was Professor of Mathematics and Philosophy at Princeton, 19617, and then Professor of Philosophy and Mathematics at UCLA until he retired in 1990. Church died in 1995.

Sir Michael Dummett is Emeritus Professor at the University of Oxford. He was knighted for service to philosophy and racial justice.

Frederic B. Fitch was Sterling Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at Yale University when he died in 1987.

Michael Hand is Professor of Philosophy at Texas A&M University.

W. D. Hart is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

C. S. Jenkins is Arch Associate Fellow at the University of St Andrews, Associate Fellow of the Centre for Metaphysics and Mind at the University of Leeds, and Lecturer at the University of Nottingham.

Christoph Kelp has recently completed his doctoral dissertation at the University of Stirling.

Jonathan L. Kvanvig is Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at Baylor University.

Bernard Linsky is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Alberta.

Graham Priest is the Boyce Gibson Professor of Philosophy at the University of Melbourne, and Arch Professorial Fellow at the University of St Andrews.

Duncan Pritchard is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Edinburgh.

Stig Alstrup Rasmussen has formerly held positions at the Universities of Edinburgh and Copenhagen. He obtained his habilitation at the University of Copenhagen in 2004.

Greg Restall is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Melbourne.

Joe Salerno is Research Fellow at the Australian National University and Associate Professor of Philosophy at Saint Louis University.

Neil Tennant is Humanities Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the Ohio State University.

Timothy Williamson is the Wykeham Professor of Logic at the University of Oxford.

Acknowledgements

I am indebted to the contributors for their hard work and their patience with the editorial process. Each of them has furthered my understanding of the knowability proofs and other matters modal epistemic. I am extremely grateful to the graduate students that have served as my research assistants: Amy Broadway (Missouri), Heidi Lockwood (Yale), Julien Murzi (Sheffield), Jonathan Nelson (Saint Louis) and Nick Zavidiuk (Saint Louis). They helped me enormously with various aspects of the projectamong them, plundering archives, transcribing, compiling the bibliography, typesetting, and proof-reading for typographical and philosophical errors. Thanks also to my graduate students at Saint Louis University for stimulation, and to those grads at the Goethe University of Frankfurt who attended my seminar on the knowability paradox in May 2006. I thank the editor, Peter Momtchiloff, and supporting editors for their assistance and dedication to the project and to two anonymous Oxford University Press readers for their exceedingly helpful comments and suggestions. Many people have helped to improve the volume in one way or another, including Aldo Antonelli, Jc Beall, Scott Berman, Jim Bohman, Susan Brower-Toland, John Burgess, David Chalmers, Roy Cook, Judy Crane, Michael Della Rocca, Herbert Enderton, Saul Feferman, Bas van Fraassen, Anne-Sophie Gintzburger, John Greco, Nick Griffin, Michael Hand, Monte Johnson, John Kearns, Jon Kvanvig, Bernard Linsky, Heidi Lockwood, Ruth Barcan Marcus, Robert Meyer, Gualtiero Piccinini, Graham Priest, Krister Segerberg, Wilfried Sieg, Roy Sorensen, Kent Staley, Jim Stone, Eleonore Stump, Neil Tennant, Achille Varzi and Ted Vitali. Berit Brogaard deserves special mention for being a constant source of feedback. My daughter, Rebecca, has been an endless source of sleepless nights but also inspiration, both of which were needed to complete this project. It is to her that I dedicate the volume.

J.S.

Introduction

Joe Salerno

The Knowability Paradox

In his seminal paper A Logical Analysis of Some Value Concepts (1963; reprinted, of this volume), Frederic Fitch articulates an argument that threatens to collapse a number of modal epistemic distinctions. Most directly, it threatens to collapse the existence of fortuitous ignorance into the existence of necessary unknowability. For it shows that there is an unknown truth, only if there is a logically unknowable truth. Fitch called this Theorem 5, which usually is represented formally as follows:

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «New Essays on the Knowability Paradox»

Look at similar books to New Essays on the Knowability Paradox. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «New Essays on the Knowability Paradox»

Discussion, reviews of the book New Essays on the Knowability Paradox and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.