• Complain

Charlotte Sleigh - Ant

Here you can read online Charlotte Sleigh - Ant full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2004, publisher: Reaktion Books, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Charlotte Sleigh Ant

Ant: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Ant" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Ants are legion: at present there are 11,006 species of ant known; they live everywhere in the world except the polar icecaps; and the combined weight of the ant population has been estimated to make up half the mass of all insects alive today.
When we encounter them outdoors, ants fascinate us; discovered in our kitchen cupboards, they elicit horror and disgust. Charlotte Sleighs Ant elucidates the cultural reasons behind our varied reactions to these extraordinary insects, and considers the variety of responses that humans have expressed at different times and in different places to their intricate, miniature societies. Ants have figured as fantasy miniature armies, as models of good behavior, as infiltrating communists and as creatures on the borderline between the realms of the organic and the machine: in 1977 British Telecom hired ant experts to help solve problems with their massive information network.
This is the first book to examine ants in these and many other such guises, and in so doing opens up broader issues about the history of science and humans relations with the natural world. It will be of interest to anyone who likes natural history or cultural studies, or who has ever rushed out and bought a can of Raid.
[Charlotte Sleighs] stylish, engaging and informative study deserves to win new members for the ant fan club.Jonathan Bate, The Times

Charlotte Sleigh: author's other books


Who wrote Ant? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Ant — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Ant" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Ant Animal Series editor Jonathan Burt Already published Crow Boria Sax - photo 1

Ant

Picture 2

Animal

Series editor: Jonathan Burt

Already published

Crow

Boria Sax

Tortoise

Peter Young

Cockroach

Marion Copeland

Forthcoming

Wolf

Falcon

Garry Marvin

Helen Macdonald

Bear

Parrot

Robert E. Bieder

Paul Carter

Horse

Whale

Sarah Wintle

Joseph Roman

Spider

Rat

Leslie Dick

Jonathan Burt

Dog

Hare

Susan McHugh

Simon Carnell

Snake

Bee

Drake Stutesman

Claire Preston

Oyster

Rebecca Stott

Ant

Charlotte Sleigh

REAKTION BOOKS For Mary who is pretty wise for a two-legged animal - photo 3

REAKTION BOOKS

For Mary, who is pretty wise for a two-legged animal.

Published by
REAKTION BOOKS LTD
33 Great Sutton Street
London EC1V 0DX, UK
www.reaktionbooks.co.uk

First published 2003
Copyright Charlotte Sleigh 2003

All rights reserved

No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publishers.

Page references in the Photo Acknowledgements and
Index match the printed edition of this book.

Printed and bound in Hong Kong

British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data

Sleigh, Charlotte

Ant. (Animal)
1. Ants 2. Animals and civilization
I. Title
595.796

eISBN 9781861894816

Contents

Ants Formicae on an anthill a miniature from a French bestiary of c 1450 - photo 4

Ants (Formicae) on an anthill, a miniature from a French bestiary of c. 1450.

Introduction

It is extraordinarily difficult to avoid using grandiose adjectives in the description of ants.

Ants command a respect from their fans out of all proportion to the insects size. Ants, they affirm, are the -est insects: the cleverest, most organized, hardest-working, most numerous, most fecund, most dominant; they are older than humans, more bellicose, more cooperative, more communicative. Frequently these comparisons border on the bizarre. A childrens web site asserts: Ant brains are largest amongst insects... It has been estimated that an ants brain may have the same processing power as a Macintosh II computer.

At least, all this is what myrmecologists (those who study ants) would have us believe. Though their precise claims have changed over time, western students of ants always seem to have made hyperbolic assertions about them.

The eighteenth century natural philosopher Raumur started at a basic level in his catalogue of the extraordinary qualities of ants: we have for them none of those aversions that are frequently entertained towards so many other insects.This independent existence of ants has, at various times, been a source both of wonder and of horror. Thomas Mouffet, a sixteenth-century physician, noted that the ants

... are so exemplary... it is no wonder that Plato, Phaedone, hath determined that they who without the help of philosophy have lead a civill life by custom or from their own diligence, they had their souls from Ants, and when they die they are turned to ants again.

Here, the ants lack of reliance upon philosophy marks out the alternative yet equivalent nature of their civic lives: a parallel so wondrous that, according to Pliny, they are the only creatures besides us that bury their dead with funeral rites. More contemporary analogue-myths assert with equal confidence that ants, if magnified to the size of sheep, would rule the earth, and that in the event of a nuclear holocaust they would outlast humans.

In between the eras of Plato and NATO, observers have concocted a canon of astounding facts and figures concerning the numbers of ants, their distribution, their reproduction and modes of life. They are habitually scaled up to equate to human terms, upon which basis their nests are compared to the pyramids, or to the Great Wall of China, and their movement with that of a speeding train. They have recently been enumerated at ten thousand trillion; collectively they are asserted to weigh as much as the earths human population. E. O. Wilson, the most renowned living myrmecologist, claims that the behaviour of ants is scientifically more interesting than that of humans bestial cousin and the psychologists current favourite, the chimp. The reason for this, he writes, is that ants can be studied for the meaning of their social interaction, whereas the

The remainder of Ant explores this process of myth-making and suggests some reasons for the precise images and values that have been attached to ants at various times and in various places. The rest of this chapter, however, is devoted to a summary of the contemporary scientific understanding of ants: the stories that are told by myrmecologists today.

The animal kingdom is divided into successively smaller categories, which as they decrease in size reflect a greater degree of similarity and presumed evolutionary connection between their members. Phyla are the largest groups, which are then successively divided into classes, orders, families, genera, and finally into species. Insects are one class of the phylum Arthropoda. (Non-insectan arthropods include crustaceans and spiders.) The class Insecta is made up of various orders, including Coleoptera (beetles) and Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths). The order Hymenoptera contains ants, as well as their evolutionary cousins, the bees and wasps. Termites, although often referred to as white ants have long been assigned to a different order, the Isoptera, which they share with their less loveable relations, cockroaches. Within the order Hymenoptera, one family Formicidae contains all the true ants. Ants are easy to recognize compared with many other insects. All are the same basic shape and have a characteristic kink in their ever-busy antennae. The Formicidae are split down into around three hundred genera, some of which have informal descriptive names such as sugar ants, bulldog ants or meat ants. Individual species vary in size between 0.7 millimetres and 3 centimetres in length.

At the time of writing, the latest count of ant species was 11,006. Although this represents a tiny proportion of knowninsect species (about 750,000, of which most are beetles), the combined weight of all living ants has been estimated to constitute half the mass of all extant insects. This figure, out of all proportion to the number of insect species, shows the success of ants in exploiting a variety of habitats around the world: just about everywhere apart from the polar regions.

Frontal view of worker ant Paratrechina sp showing the antennal kink - photo 5

Frontal view of worker ant (Paratrechina sp.) showing the antennal kink characteristic of all modern ants.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Ant»

Look at similar books to Ant. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Ant»

Discussion, reviews of the book Ant and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.