THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF
THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION
THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF
THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION
Edited by
SUJIT CHOUDHRY, MADHAV KHOSLA,
and
PRATAP BHANU MEHTA
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the Universitys objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
The several contributors 2016
The moral rights of the authors have been assertedFirst Edition published in 2016
Impression: 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Crown copyright material is reproduced under Class Licence
Number C01P0000148 with the permission of OPSI and the Queens Printer for Scotland
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2016931143
ISBN 9780198704898
eISBN 9780191058622
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
A CKNOWLEDGEMENTS
O UR greatest debt is to Varun Srikanth for his invaluable contributions to this project. He played a crucial role in research, editing, organisation, and management, performing each task with remarkable enthusiasm. If volumes such as this are endurance tests, they are made possible only by runners like him. We are grateful to the funders who made this project possible, especially the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) whose funding of the Centre for Policy Research (CPR) through the Think Tank Initiative enabled the volume and a four-day writers workshop in New Delhi in July 2014. The authors active and energetic participation throughout the workshop, individually and collectively, helped to make this volume a coherent whole that is greater than the sum of its individual contributions. Samuel Issacharoff served as a commentator throughout the workshop, offering important suggestions on every single paper. We thank him for his remarkable generosity. We are grateful to David Singh Grewal and KP Krishnan for their vital inputs and feedback at the workshop, and to Fali Nariman whose participation at the event helped us appreciate the importance of constitutional advocacy. Staff at CPR, the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, and the NYU School of Law provided administrative support throughout the duration of this project. We also acknowledge the support of the late KC Sivaramakrishnan, Chairman of CPRs Board, who is also a contributor to this volume. We are sad he did not live to see this project reach completion, but his probing questions on Indian constitutionalism and its impact on government were a great spur to us. Raeesa Vakil went beyond the call of duty in so many respects. Apart from her fine contribution, she was indispensable in helping us to fill gaps in the volume. Her clarity and command of detail was a resource we frequently exploited. For research assistance, we are also grateful to Vasanthi Venkatesh at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law. We thank Alex Flach, Natasha Flemming, and Nicole Leyland at Oxford University Press for their unwavering belief in and support of this project. We are very grateful to Shyama Warner, whose care and dedication prevented serious errors. Finally, Pratap and Sujit would like to express their profound gratitude to Madhav, whose energy and imagination were central at every stage of this project, and integral to its success.
C ONTENTS
S UJIT C HOUDHRY , M ADHAV K HOSLA, AND P RATAP B HANU M EHTA R OHIT D E U DAY S M EHTA H ANNA L ERNER C HINTAN C HANDRACHUD U PENDRA B AXI G ARY J EFFREY J ACOBSOHN S HRUTI R AJAGOPALAN L AVANYA R AJAMANI N IRAJA G OPAL J AYAL S UJIT C HOUDHRY A DITYA S ONDHI R AHUL S AGAR M ADHAV K HOSLA J USTICE ( RETD ) R UMA P AL MR M ADHAVAN S IDHARTH C HAUHAN S HUBHANKAR D AM N ICK R OBINSON J USTICE ( RETD ) BN S RIKRISHNA R AEESA V AKIL TV S OMANATHAN A RUN K T HIRUVENGADAM P RATEEK J ALAN AND R ITIN R AI M AHENDRA P AL S INGH V N IRANJAN A RVIND P D ATAR H ARISH S ALVE N IRVIKAR S INGH L OUISE T ILLIN KC S IVARAMAKRISHNAN A NANTH P ADMANABHAN S TEPHEN G ARDBAUM G OPAL S UBRAMANIUM S URYA D EVA G AUTAM B HATIA S HYAM D IVAN S HYAMKRISHNA B ALGANESH T ARUNABH K HAITAN V INAY S ITAPATI R ATNA K APUR A NUP S URENDRANATH A BHINAV C HANDRACHUD A PARNA C HANDRA AND M RINAL S ATISH L AWRENCE L IANG M ENAKA G URUSWAMY A NIRUDH B URMAN V IKRAMADITYA S K HANNA R ONOJOY S EN F LAVIA A GNES K V IVEK R EDDY N AMITA W AHI U MAKANTH V AROTTIL N EELANJAN M AITRA R AJU R AMACHANDRAN M ARK T USHNET
A Sanjeevi Naidu v State of Madras (1970) 1 SCC 443
A Yousuf Rawther v Sowramma AIR 1971 Ker 261
A & B v State Through NCT of Delhi 2010 Cri LJ 669
AB Shorawal v LK Advani AIR 1977 All 426
Abdul Rehman Antulay v RS Nayak (1992) 1 SCC 225
Abdur Rahim v Joseph A Pinto AIR 1951 Hyd 11 (FB)
ABL International v Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd (2004) 3 SCC 553
Abraham v Abraham [1863] 9 MIA 199
Acharya Jagdishwaranand Avadhuta v Commissioner of Police (1983) 4 SCC 522
Additional District Magistrate, Jabalpur v Shivakant Shukla (1976) 2 SCC 521
ADM Jabalpur v Shivakant Shukla (1976) 2 SCC 521
Ahmedabad Mill Owners Association v IG Thakore AIR 1967 SC 1091
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v Nawab Khan Gulab Khan (1997) 11 SCC 121
Ahmedabad St Xaviers College Society v State of Gujarat (1974) 1 SCC 717
Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority v Sharad Kumar Jayanti Kumar Pasawalla (1992) 3 SCC 285
Ahmedabad Women Action Group (AWAG) v Union of India (1997) 3 SCC 573
Air India v Nargesh Meerza (1981) 4 SCC 335
Air India Statutory Corporation v United Labour Union (1997) 9 SCC 377
AJ Peiris v State of Madras AIR 1954 SC 616
Ajaib Singh v State of Haryana (1992) Supp (2) SCC 338
Ajay Canu v Union of India (1988) 4 SCC 156
Ajay Goswami v Union of India (2007) 1 SCC 143
Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib Sehravardi (1981) 1 SCC 722
Ajit Singh Januja v State of Punjab (1996) 2 SCC 715
Ajit Singh (II) v State of Punjab (1999) 7 SCC 209
Ajoy Kumar Banerjee v Union of India (1984) 3 SCC 127
AK Gopalan v State of Madras AIR 1950 SC 27
AK Roy v Union of India (1982) 1 SCC 271
Akadasi Padhan v State of Orissa AIR 1963 SC 1047
Akhil Bharat Goseva Sangh (3) v State of Andhra Pradesh (2006) 4 SCC 162
Akhil Bharatiya Soshit Sangh (Railways) v Union of India (1981) 1 SCC 246
Ajmal Kasab v State of Maharashtra (2012) 9 SCC 1
AL Kalra v Project & Equipment Corp of India Ltd (1984) 3 SCC 316
All Bihar Christian Schools Association v State of Bihar (1988) 1 SCC 206
Next page