• Complain

Alexandra M. Kokoli - The Feminist Uncanny in Theory and Art Practice

Here you can read online Alexandra M. Kokoli - The Feminist Uncanny in Theory and Art Practice full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2016, publisher: Bloomsbury Academic, genre: Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Alexandra M. Kokoli The Feminist Uncanny in Theory and Art Practice
  • Book:
    The Feminist Uncanny in Theory and Art Practice
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Bloomsbury Academic
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2016
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Feminist Uncanny in Theory and Art Practice: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Feminist Uncanny in Theory and Art Practice" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The Feminist Uncanny in Theory and Art Practice investigates the widely debated, deeply flawed yet influential concept of the uncanny through the lens of feminist theory and contemporary art practice. Not merely a subversive strategy but a cipher of the fraught but fertile dialogue between feminism and psychoanalysis, the uncanny makes an ideal vehicle for an arrangement marked by ambivalence and acts as a constant reminder that feminism and psychoanalysis are never quite at home with one another.
The Feminist Uncanny begins by charting the uncanniness of femininity in foundational psychoanalytic texts by Ernst Jentsch, Sigmund Freud, Jacques Lacan and Mladen Dolar, and contextually introduces a range of feminist responses and appropriations by Hlne Cixous, Julia Kristeva and Sarah Kofman, among others. The book also offers thematically organised interpretations of famous artworks and practices informed by feminism, including Judy Chicagos Dinner Party, Faith Ringgolds story quilts and Susan Hillers paraconceptualism, as well as less well-known practice, such as the Womens Postal Art Even (Feministo) and the photomontages of Maud Sulter. Dead (lexicalised) metaphors, unhomely domesticity, identity and (dis)identification, and the tension between family stories and arts histories are examined in and from the perspective of different artistic and critical practices, illustrating different aspects of the feminist uncanny.
Through a partisan yet comprehensive critical review of the fascinating concept of the uncanny, The Feminist Uncanny in Theory and Art Practice proposes a new concept, the feminist uncanny, which it upholds as one of the most enduring legacies of the Womens Liberation Movement in contemporary art theory and practice.

Alexandra M. Kokoli: author's other books


Who wrote The Feminist Uncanny in Theory and Art Practice? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Feminist Uncanny in Theory and Art Practice — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Feminist Uncanny in Theory and Art Practice" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
The Feminist Uncanny in Theory and Art Practice Also available from Bloomsbury - photo 1

The Feminist Uncanny in Theory and Art Practice

Also available from Bloomsbury

Feminist Theory, Fourth Edition , Josephine Donovan

Feminist Theory After Deleuze , Hannah Stark

Listening to Noise and Silence , Salome Voegelin

The Trouble and Strife Reader , edited by Deborah Cameron and Joan Scanlon

The Feminist Uncanny in Theory and Art Practice

Alexandra M. Kokoli

Bloomsbury Academic

An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc

Contents Coin with a Gorgons Head 550-546 BCE Athens Courtesy of the British - photo 2

Contents

Coin with a Gorgons Head, 550-546 BCE, Athens. Courtesy of the British Museum.

Lorraine OGrady, Untitled (Mlle Bourgeoise Noire Beats Herself with the Whip-That-Made-Plantations-Move) , 198083/2009. Silver gelatin fibre print in 13 parts. 9 11/16 in. x 7 1/2 in. Courtesy Alexander Gray Associates, New York. 2014 Lorraine OGrady / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.

Lorraine OGrady, Untitled (Crowd Watches Mlle Bourgeoise Noire Whipping Herself) , 198083/2009. Silver gelatin fibre print in 13 parts. 9 11/16 in. x 7 7/8 in. Courtesy Alexander Gray Associates, New York. 2014 Lorraine OGrady / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.

Lorraine OGrady, Untitled (Mlle Bourgeoise Noire Shouts her Poem) , 198083/2009. Silver gelatin fibre print in 13 parts. 9 5/8 in. x 6 1/2 in. Courtesy Alexander Gray Associates, New York. 2014 Lorraine OGrady / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.

Susan Hiller, Sisters of Menon , 1972/79, installation view. Blue pencil, typescript and gouache on paper. Courtesy of the artist.

Susan Hiller, Sisters of Menon , 1972/79, Analysis of the Relationship between Automatism and Creativity. Blue pencil, typescript and gouache on paper. Courtesy of the artist.

Susan Hiller, Sisters of Menon , 1972/79, automatic writing, page 8. Blue pencil, typescript and gouache on paper. Courtesy of the artist.

Susan Hiller, Midnight, Tottenham Court Road , 1982. C-type prints enlarged from handworked photobooth images. Courtesy of the artist.

Susan Hiller, The Last Silent Movie , 2007. Single-channel projection with sound, 20 mins, installation view. Courtesy of the artist.

Susan Hiller, The Last Silent Movie , 2007. 25 etchings. Plate 7 Khallam, They are lying to us. Courtesy of the artist.

Louise Bourgeois, Femme Maison , 194647. Ink on linen. 36 x 14"; 91.4 x 35.6 cm. Private Collection; Photo: Christopher Burke. The Easton Foundation/Licensed by DACS, London.

Robin, Weltsch, The Kitchen, installation view, Womanhouse , 1972. Courtesy of the California Institute of the Arts Institute Archive.

Faith Wilding, Crocheted Environment, installation view, Womanhouse , 1972. Courtesy of the artist.

Robin Schiff, Nightmare Bathroom, Womanhouse , 1972. Courtesy of the California Institute of the Arts Institute Archive.

A Portrait of the Artist as a Housewife, c.1977. Black-and-white publicity poster, 21 x 29.5 (A4). Feministo: Portrait of the Artist as a Housewife , Womens Art Library/MAKE, London.

Su Richardson, Burnt Breakfast and Packed Lunch , 197576, crochet and mixed media. Feministo: Portrait of the Artist as a Housewife . Photograph by Susan Richardson, 2010. Susan Richardson. All Rights Reserved, DACS 2015.

Kate Walker, Keep Smiling Chocs , c.197577, mixed media in chocolate box, Feministo: Portrait of the Artist as a Housewife . Photograph by Michael Ann Mullen. Courtesy of the artists estate and Michael Ann Mullen.

Kate Walker, Black Magic Bodies , c.197577, mixed media in chocolate box, Feministo: Portrait of the Artist as a Housewife . Photograph by Michael Ann Mullen. Courtesy of the artists estate and Michael Ann Mullen.

Judy Chicago, The Dinner Party , 197479, installation view. Judy Chicago. ARS, NY and DACS, London 2015.

Judy Chicago, Kali place setting from The Dinner Party , 197479. Judy Chicago. ARS, NY and DACS, London 2015.

Judy Chicago, Georgia OKeeffe place setting from The Dinner Party , 197479. Judy Chicago. ARS, NY and DACS, London 2015.

Mary Beth Edelson, Some Living American Women Artists/Last Supper, 1972. Cut-and-pasted gelatin silver prints with crayon and transfer type on printed paper with typewriting on cut-and-taped paper, 28.25 x 43 (71.8 x 109.2 cm). The Museum of Modern Art, New York. Courtesy of the artist.

Sutapa Biswas, Housewives with Steakknives , 1985. Oil, acrylic and pastel on paper and canvas. Collection of Bradford Museums and Galleries.

Jo Spence, Eight and a half months (High street photographer Woodford) & Five hundred and twenty-eight months later, The Family Album 193979 , 1979. Estate of Jo Spence. Courtesy of Richard Saltoun Gallery.

Jo Spence, Phototherapy Sessions with Rosy Martin: Transformations, c.1984, Picturing my dead parents. Estate of Jo Spence. Courtesy of Richard Saltoun Gallery.

Marie Yates, The Only Woman , 1985. Section 1. Rage, 4 panels (detail). Photograph by the artist. Courtesy of the artist.

Marie Yates, The Only Woman , 1985. Section 2. Pain, 10 panels (detail). Photograph by the artist. Courtesy of the artist.

Marie Yates, The Only Woman , 1985. Section 3. Gaze, 6 panels. Photograph by the artist. Courtesy of the artist.

May Stevens, Rosa Alice: Ordinary/Extraordinary , 1977, collage and mixed media. Courtesy of RYAN LEE, New York.

Maud Sulter, Jeanne: A Melodrama , 2002, collage on four panels, panel 1 of 4. Courtesy of the Maud Sulter Archive.

Maud Sulter, Jeanne: A Melodrama , 2002, collage on four panels, panel 2 of 4. Courtesy of the Maud Sulter Archive.

Freddie Robins, Ethel Knitted Homes of Crime , 2002. Knitted wool, quilted lining fabric, 260 x 180 x 160mm. Handknitted by Jean Arkell. Photograph by Douglas Atfield. Courtesy of the artist.

Monica Ross, Ghost in the Spinning Mill performance, Rochdale Gallery, 1985. Original photograph by Patsy Mullan, scanned and processed by Bernard G. Mills. Courtesy of the Monica Ross Archive and Bernard G. Mills.

Monica Ross, Ghost in the Spinning Mill performance, Rochdale Gallery, 1985. Original photograph by Patsy Mullan, scanned and processed by Bernard G. Mills. Courtesy of the Monica Ross Archive and Bernard G. Mills.

I wish to thank the Art & Design Research Institute (ADRI), Middlesex University, whose financial support reduced my teaching load in 201415, allowing me to complete this book. I am especially grateful to Dr. Valeria Graziano of ADRI for her assistance towards organizing and securing permissions for illustrations. I would also like to thank the Association of Art Historians (AAH) for their financial award towards licensing and reprographic costs, without which The Feminist Uncanny would have included far fewer illustrations.

For permission to reproduce some previously published material, I am grateful to KT Press and Tate Publishing. I also wish to thank the artists whose work is reproduced here and their representatives for their support of this book project.

I have shared ideas that culminated in The Feminist Uncanny at various stages of development with colleagues past and present and a variety of international academic audiences and discussants, whom I thank for their feedback, encouragement and occasional reality check. Professors Deborah Cherry and Elena Gualtieri successfully introduced me to the ways of scholarship and academic writing some years ago, despite some resistance on my part; I thank them for their expert guidance and persistence. My gratitude also goes to all the anonymous peerreviewers who have engaged with my work, for their unpaid and largely invisible labour.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Feminist Uncanny in Theory and Art Practice»

Look at similar books to The Feminist Uncanny in Theory and Art Practice. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Feminist Uncanny in Theory and Art Practice»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Feminist Uncanny in Theory and Art Practice and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.