• Complain

Scott Morrison - 1972: The Series That Changed Hockey Forever

Here you can read online Scott Morrison - 1972: The Series That Changed Hockey Forever full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: New York, year: 2022, publisher: Simon & Schuster, genre: Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    1972: The Series That Changed Hockey Forever
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Simon & Schuster
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2022
  • City:
    New York
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

1972: The Series That Changed Hockey Forever: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "1972: The Series That Changed Hockey Forever" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

#1 BESTSELLER
The legacy of the greatest hockey series ever played, fifty years later, with stories from the players that shed new light on those incredible games and times.
Cournoyer has it on that wing. Heres a shot. Henderson made a wild stab for it and fell. Heres another shot. Right in front...they score! Henderson has scored for Canada!
These immortal words, spoken to hockey fans around the world by the legendary broadcaster Foster Hewitt, capture the historic final-seconds goal scored by Paul Henderson that won the 1972 Summit Series against the Soviet Union. Hockey fans know the moment well, but the story of those amazing eight games has never been fully tolduntil now.
The series was the first of its kind, and one of the most dramatic sporting showdowns in history. With the Soviets dominating international hockey, this series was meant to settle the debate, once and for all, of who owned the game. It was Canadas best against the Soviets for the first time. And in the shadow of the Cold War, this was about more than eight games of hockey.
Expectations were high as the series began. This was supposed to be easy for Team Canada, but after the disappointing first four games on home ice with only one win, victory seemed out of reach. With the final four games in Moscow, Canada got a rare glimpse behind the iron curtain as the team, as well as three thousand raucous fans, arrived in the USSR. Amid the culture shock and strained relations, what followed was a tug-of-war battle that lasted to the dying seconds of game 8.
Now, five decades after this historic event, its time to reflect on the greatest hockey series ever played. Veteran journalist and hockey analyst Scott Morrison uses a storytellers voice to reveal what it meant to hockey then, and what it means now. Filled with the memories of the players and others involved with the series, he shows how it changed the game, and challenged a nations sense of identity and place in the world.

Scott Morrison: author's other books


Who wrote 1972: The Series That Changed Hockey Forever? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

1972: The Series That Changed Hockey Forever — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "1972: The Series That Changed Hockey Forever" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Contents
Guide
Scott Morrison 1972 The Series That Changed Hockey Forever With a Foreword by - photo 1

Scott Morrison

1972

The Series That Changed Hockey Forever

With a Foreword by Phil Esposito

Simon Schuster Canada A Division of Simon Schuster Inc 166 King Street - photo 2

Picture 3

Simon & Schuster Canada

A Division of Simon & Schuster, Inc.

166 King Street East, Suite 300

Toronto, Ontario M5A 1J3

www.SimonandSchuster.ca

Copyright 2022 by Scott Morrison

All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this book or portions thereof in any form whatsoever. For information, address Simon & Schuster Canada Subsidiary Rights Department, 166 King Street East, Suite 300, Toronto, Ontario, M5A 1J3.

This Simon & Schuster Canada edition May 2022

SIMON & SCHUSTER CANADA and colophon are trademarks of Simon & Schuster, Inc.

For information about special discounts for bulk purchases, please contact Simon & Schuster Special Sales at 1-800-268-3216 or .

Jacket Images: Getty/Melchior DiGiacomo

Author photo Courtesy of Sportsnet

Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication

Title: 1972 : the series that changed hockey forever / Scott Morrison.

Names: Morrison, Scott, 1958 editor.

Description: Simon & Schuster Canada edition.

Identifiers: Canadiana (print) 20210189258 | Canadiana (ebook) 20210189266 | ISBN 9781982154141 (hardcover) | ISBN 9781982154318 (ebook)

Subjects: CSH: Canada-U.S.S.R. Hockey Series, 1972.

Classification: LCC GV847.7 .M65 2021 | DDC 796.962/66dc23

ISBN 978-1-9821-5414-1

ISBN 978-1-9821-5431-8 (ebook)

Foreword

A columnist I know once wrote: Phil Esposito fell nineteen years before the Soviet Union did. Only Esposito stood back up and blew a kiss at stone-faced Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev. Esposito and Canada then toppled the Soviet hockey empire in the famed 1972 Summit Series.

The fall he referred to was me landing on my ass during the introductions prior to the first game in Moscow, the fifth game in the series. The Soviets were leading 2-1-1, which was a shocker to say the least and had everyone in Canada hyperventilating, except for the ones who were booing us. Brezhnev was proudly watching from a private box, figuring his boys were going to put us away in the four games on home ice and score a big win for the motherland. And, yes, I blew him a kiss and everyone around him laughed.

We went on to fall again that night, blowing a lead, losing the game, and putting ourselves in a position where we needed to win the final three games to salvage our pride and our reputation as the best hockey nation on the planet. As improbable as it once seemed that the Russians would take a stranglehold on the series, it seemed just as improbable that we would come back.

And, as if the stakes werent big enough already, we were fighting for our country.

There is a reason why, fifty years later, people are still talking about 1972. Its quite simple, actually. Its not because I got up off my ass, but because we as a team did and we won. Everybody loves a winner; nobody cares about a loser.

So, there you have it.

It was a great series, but it was also, in my opinion, something that should never have happened, at least not the way it was played. I believed it then and I believe it now. In fact, when I first got called and asked to play, I said no. Three times, in fact, I said no before Bobby Orr called and urged me to play, and I said yes. I was an NHL playerwho the hell wanted to play in an exhibition series like that? And we were told it wasnt going to be anything more than that, an exhibition series with all the intensity of an all-star game. Thats the truth. I didnt care.

I cared about my NHL team, the Boston Bruins, the Stanley Cup champions. My brother, Tony, the reigning Vezina Trophy winner, cared about his NHL team, the Chicago Blackhawks. We had training camp coming up, and it was the first time I was making a half-decent salary. I didnt want to get hurt in an exhibition series. Remember, there were no guaranteed contracts back then.

I also totally disagreed with us being called Team Canada and I made that perfectly clear the very first day of training camp. If we dont have the likes of Bobby Hull and Gerry Cheevers and other stars who were going to play in the rival World Hockey Associationtheyre all Canadianshow are we called Team Canada? But that was the start of the politics in a series that became very political on so many levels.

One thing I will say: if wed had our best players (meaning the WHA guys, too) and trained for a month knowing how intense the series was going to be, the Soviets wouldnt have been able to win a game. Okay, maybe one gameand thats not taking anything away from them, because they were good. But I think having Bobby Hull, the rest of those WHA guys, and Bobby Orr would have made a huge difference. Anyway, theres lots more about that in the pages ahead.

I also didnt like that we had to play by international rules with international officials. We were the NHL, the best league in the world. So if youre going to play the best league in the world, then you should play by their rules, not by international rules. And who sets the international rules? At the time it was a guy named Bunny Ahearne, who was the head of international hockey, and you know who he wanted to win.

Thats why I said we should never have played under those circumstances. I had no interest. None.

Having said all that, fifty years later, the competitor and Canadian in me is glad I ultimately agreed to be a part of it, even though that series took a huge toll on a lot of us and we still feel it to this day. It was supposed to be nothing more than a lopsided exhibition series (and an unwelcome interruption to summer) between the so-called amateurs from the Soviet Union (trust me, they were not amateurs in any sense of the word) and what was supposed to be the best Canadian team (like I said, it wasnt) in the first ever best-on-best series.

Well, it turned out to become the greatest hockey series ever, one in which we had everything to lose and nothing to gain. And we did become Team Canada in the sense that, before it was over, we truly were representing our country, not just the NHL.

If we had lostand it damned near happened, of coursewould we still be talking about it today? I dont think so. It would have been long forgotten, at least by us. But were still talking about 1972 because everybody loves a winner. In the end, everyone was a winnerTeam Canada for sure; the Soviets feel like they were winners (and still celebrate the anniversaries) because of how well they played; and hockey fans won because the entertainment and drama was so damn good.

But only one team truly won the series on the ice!

Part of what made it the greatest series ever was that the world was a much different place in 1972. It was a hockey series with pride and bragging rights on the line, but it was also a battle of political ideals. It became country versus country, society against society. It was our way of life versus their way of life. Thats how it felt. The Russians were saying communism was better, we were saying capitalism was better. I hated communism and still do. And this battle of political and social issues was being fought on the ice. The Russians were the enemy, a big, powerful country feared on the political stage. Like I said, it wasnt just hockey pride that was on the line, it was real-life pride.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «1972: The Series That Changed Hockey Forever»

Look at similar books to 1972: The Series That Changed Hockey Forever. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «1972: The Series That Changed Hockey Forever»

Discussion, reviews of the book 1972: The Series That Changed Hockey Forever and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.