• Complain

Patrick M. Garry - Limited Government and the Bill of Rights

Here you can read online Patrick M. Garry - Limited Government and the Bill of Rights full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Columbia, year: 2012, publisher: University of Missouri Press, genre: Science / Business. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Patrick M. Garry Limited Government and the Bill of Rights
  • Book:
    Limited Government and the Bill of Rights
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    University of Missouri Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2012
  • City:
    Columbia
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Limited Government and the Bill of Rights: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Limited Government and the Bill of Rights" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

What was the intended purpose and function of the Bill of Rights? Is the modern understanding of the Bill of Rights the same as that which prevailed when the document was ratified? In Limited Government and the Bill of Rights, Patrick Garry addresses these questions. Under the popular modern view, the Bill of Rights focuses primarily on protecting individual autonomy interests, making it all about the individual. But in Garrys novel approach, one that tries to address the criticisms of judicial activism that have resulted from the Supreme Courts contemporary individual rights jurisprudence, the Bill of Rights is all about governmentabout limiting the power of government. In this respect, the Bill of Rights is consistent with the overall scheme of the original Constitution, insofar as it sought to define and limit the power of the newly created federal government.Garry recognizes the desire of the constitutional framers to protect individual liberties and natural rights, indeed, a recognition of such rights had formed the basis of the American campaign for independence from Britain. However, because the constitutional framers did not have a clear idea of how to define natural rights, much less incorporate them into a written constitution for enforcement, they framed the Bill of Rights as limited government provisions rather than as individual autonomy provisions. To the framers, limited government was the constitutional path to the maintenance of liberty. Moreover, crafting the Bill of Rights as limited government provisions would not give the judiciary the kind of wide-ranging power needed to define and enforce individual autonomy.With respect to the application of this limited government model, Garry focuses specifically on the First Amendment and examines how the courts in many respects have already used a limited government model in their First Amendment decision-making. As he discusses, this approach to the First Amendment may allow for a more objective and restrained judicial role than is often applied under contemporary First Amendment jurisprudence.Limited Government and the Bill of Rights will appeal to anyone interested in the historical background of the Bill of Rights and how its provisions should be applied to contemporary cases, particularly First Amendment cases. It presents an innovative theory about the constitutional connection between the principle of limited government and the provisions in the Bill of Rights.

Patrick M. Garry: author's other books


Who wrote Limited Government and the Bill of Rights? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Limited Government and the Bill of Rights — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Limited Government and the Bill of Rights" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Limited Government and the Bill of Rights
Patrick M. Garry
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI PRESS
COLUMBIA AND LONDON
Copyright 2012 by
The Curators of the University of Missouri
University of Missouri Press, Columbia, Missouri 65201
Printed and bound in the United States of America
All rights reserved
5 4 3 2 1 16 15 14 13 12
Cataloging-in-Publication data available from the Library of Congress.
ISBN 978-0-8262-1971-8
ISBN 978-0-8262-7272-0 (e book)
Picture 1This paper meets the requirements of the
American National Standard for Permanence of Paper
for Printed Library Materials, Z39.48, 1984.
Designer: Steph Foley
Typesetter: FoleyDesign
Printer and binder: Integrated Book Technology
Typeface: Minion
For Michael and Elizabeth
Contents
Acknowledgments
Without the reliably outstanding research assistance of Candice Spurlin and the excellent editing and manuscript-preparation work of Stephannie Bonaiuto, this book would not have been possible. To these friends and colleagues, the author extends his most sincere gratitude.
I would like to acknowledge the SMU Law Review and the Quinnipiac Law Review for giving me the opportunity to flesh out my initial thinking on some of the ideas and themes of this book.
Finally, I would like to very gratefully acknowledge the staff of the University of Missouri Press for all their diligent work in preparing the manuscript for publication. In particular, I thank Sara Davis and Gloria Thomas for their highly professional, insightful, and sensitive editorial contributions. I also thank Beth Chandler and John Brenner for their invaluable assistance in bringing the book to publication.
Introduction
Under the leadership of Chief Justice Earl Warren in the 1950s and 1960s, the United States Supreme Court adopted an aggressive brand of individual-rights jurisprudence, interpreting the Bill of Rights as setting out mandates for achieving a certain vision of individual autonomy. But this individual autonomy was defined in isolation, apart from the larger social or political landscape occupied by individuals.
Under the modern view of the Bill of Rights, as taken by the Warren Court, individual autonomy has become a primary if not exclusive focus. According to this view, the Bill of Rights was included in the Constitution for the purpose of preserving individual autonomy through insulating the individual from various democratic outcomes. It is a view that has constitutional roots in the Courts New Deal period, reflected in the infamous footnote 4 of United States v. Carolene Products Co., in which the Court suggested that it would no longer strictly scrutinize structural provisions of the Constitution, such as federalism and separation of powers, but would instead give heightened scrutiny to individual rights, such as those contained in the Bill of Rights. Unfortunately, this change in the Courts orientation served to distort the meaning of the Bill of Rights. It cast the Bill of Rights as focused primarily or exclusively on individual autonomy. It also served to separate the Bill of Rights from the structural orientation of the Constitution as a whole. Both these effects contradicted the original intent behind the Bill of Rights.
During the New Deal constitutional revolution, the Court, in order to accommodate the New Deal legislation, retreated from enforcing the Constitutions structural provisions. In this retreat, the Court suggested that it would concentrate its attentions on individual-rights matters. However, since the Bill of Rights is essentially structural in itself, the Court was simply choosing one set of structural provisions to enforce while ignoring other structural provisions. The mistake was compounded when the Court began interpreting the Bill of Rights as exclusively concerned with individual rights and autonomy, rather than with providing structural limitations on government power and authority.
There is much debate among scholars as to the intent and purpose behind the Bill of Rights. One argument is that it serves to protect and nourish certain fundamental individual rights. Under this argument, the Bill of Rights seeks first and foremost to identify particular individual freedoms and then to create a constitutional protection for those substantive freedoms, in a way that facilitates or preserves a judicially defined view of those freedoms.
Another argument looks at the Bill of Rights from a wholly different perspective. This argument sees the bill as a set of provisions designed primarily to better ensure the maintenance of limited government within the constitutional scheme. According to this argument, the Anti-Federalists, as the primary advocates for and shapers of the Bill of Rights, sought to achieve not a particular substantive protection of specific individual rights, but rather an assurance that the government being created through the new Constitution would indeed be a government of limited powers. To further secure this limited government, the Bill of Rights specified certain explicit areas in which the government would have no power to act or intrude. Whereas the rest of the constitutional scheme set out structural provisions for the overall maintenance of limited government, the Bill of Rights articulated specific substantive areas in which the principle of limited government was to prevail. The Anti-Federalists were not so concerned about identifying and protecting a finite list of particular individual rights in the new democracy; they were more concerned about alleviating fears that the original Constitution had not adequately prevented the new government from overstepping its allotted powers.
Of course, under the first argumentthe individual-autonomy argumentthe Bill of Rights would also serve to limit government. Under an individual-autonomy model, the provisions in the Bill of Rights act as rights-bearing constitutional trump cards to be played whenever the courts find that individual freedom or autonomy has been impacted by state power. But the difference between this model and the limited-government model is that the former seeks primarily to serve individual-autonomy interests and only secondarily to limit the power of government, whereas the latter model focuses primarily on limiting government and thereby indirectly protecting individual freedom. However, as this book will argue, the limited-government model can be applied in a more workable, judicially restrained, and historically supported manner than the individual-autonomy model.
The impetus for the Bill of Rights arose from the same set of concerns that influenced the structural scheme of the original Constitution. These concerns involved creating the appropriate structures and checks to keep the new central government sufficiently limited. The bill was just one more facet to that endeavor, providing additional means through which to keep the new central government limited. The Bill of Rights reinforced the boundaries of power that were already set out, albeit more generally, in the original Constitution.
It should be noted that although the original Constitution was much concerned with limitations on government power, this was not the first and foremost aim of the constitutional framers. The Constitution first and foremost sought to create a strong central government, in contrast to the weak federal government existing under the Articles of Confederation. But once this strong central government was in fact created, the Constitution then sought to limit the powers of that government. And in doing so, the Constitution employed an array of structural features aimed at ensuring a sufficiently limited federal government. In addition, and as an added assurance of such limited government, the Bill of Rights was proposed and ratified.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Limited Government and the Bill of Rights»

Look at similar books to Limited Government and the Bill of Rights. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Limited Government and the Bill of Rights»

Discussion, reviews of the book Limited Government and the Bill of Rights and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.